Agree, Grant. Having Siposs back is huge.Never thought I'd be that happy about a punter.
Good point. And, from my own point of view, their talking about Hurts this way is indication that they think Philadelphia is the better team.To paraphrase Simms, "I'm not trying to take anything away from Hurts, but....". The "but" shows he's doing just that. Simms should also try to explain why the Eagles fell flat with Minshew under center. He's a former NFL starter who should have been able to step into the Eagles' "system" and have immediate success. I hope (but doubt) the Chiefs are taking Hurts as lightly as everyone else.
A good piece of wisdom to follow: always ignore what was said after the "not" and before the "but."To paraphrase Simms, "I'm not trying to take anything away from Hurts, but....". The "but" shows he's doing just that. Simms should also try to explain why the Eagles fell flat with Minshew under center. He's a former NFL starter who should have been able to step into the Eagles' "system" and have immediate success. I hope (but doubt) the Chiefs are taking Hurts as lightly as everyone else.
And, my Redskins won three Lombardi Trophies with three different starting quarterbacks. The opposing quarterbacks in two of these games ended up in the Hall of Fame. (None of Washington’s three SB-winning qbs are in the HOF.) Is Hurts as good as Mahomes? No, but nobody else is, either, and Hurts is good enough for the Eagles to win tonight.Good point. And, from my own point of view, their talking about Hurts this way is indication that they think Philadelphia is the better team.
Is Hurts as good as Mahomes? No, but nobody else is, either, and Hurts is good enough for the Eagles to win tonight.