best record of the last 17, going back to 1943 actuallySo he's a better coach than a dozen or so tomato cans that Vanderbilt hired. Whoooppee!!
best record of the last 17, going back to 1943 actuallySo he's a better coach than a dozen or so tomato cans that Vanderbilt hired. Whoooppee!!
So he's a better coach than a dozen or so tomato cans that Vanderbilt hired. Whoooppee!!
Former S & C coach at Maryland as well as first collegiate 7’ high jumperHis agent uses the handle Frank Costello on the Auburn board
Take as you will - this isn't exactly Sir Yacht quality info - but, Auburn a place you can definitely win a NC.....
With apologies to @marshall23 - BWICAC - do your thing!
best record of the last 17, going back to 1943 actually
By far.
very convincing argumentSeventeen tomato cans! Yipppeee!!!
Take as you will - this isn't exactly Sir Yacht quality info - but, Auburn a place you can definitely win a NC.....
With apologies to @marshall23 - BWICAC - do your thing!
All of Franklin's predecessors and Vanderbilt sucked as HCs. Best of the lot: Gerry Dinardo, with Steve Sloan as runner-up.very convincing argument
Rebuild? Overall record at Baylor was 18-20. Hardly a rebuild.Two program rebuilds at Temple and Baylor get a lot of attention. Temple historically is lousy and he brought Baylor out of the scandal fallout like OB and CJF have with us.
So they can lose to Vanderbilt?I see Rhule as a Wisconsin, Nebraska, Washington, maybe Arizona State type. Auburn should take a hard look at Mark Stoops.
Anyone who wants Franklin gone at this point, is an idiot. Indisputable fact.
Well, I guess I'm an idiot.Anyone who wants Franklin gone at this point, is an idiot. Indisputable fact.
Yeah, we know.Well, I guess I'm an idiot.
Do you really think Dabo wants to be the guy to follow St Nick?Dabo is waiting for Saban to retire and will take the Alabama job. Done deal.
Anyone who wants Franklin gone at this point, is an idiot. Indisputable fact.
how long are they willing to give him?
This is what Penn State needs.Rhule is a roll up the sleeves guy, blue collar and can grind. Carolina was a terrible fit...
Auburn is a red-headed step child to Bama...they need a Rhule type of guy to Rebuild. Franklin and Dabo, you think they are roll up sleeve grinders?
They are community organizers lol they need big name places to be successful. Much like Deon--everyone thinks Deon can win a NAtty anyhwere uh NO. Good Luck with that...back to Rhule look at what he has done in re-building programs, he has shown progression success;
2013 Temple 2–10
2014 Temple 6–6
2015 Temple 10–4 Conference 7–1 1st (East) L Boca Raton
2016 Temple 10–3 Conference 7–1 1st (East) Military
2017 Baylor 1–11
2018 Baylor 7–6 Conference 4-5 W Texas
2019 Baylor 11–3 Conference 8–1 2nd L Sugar
This is what Auburn Needs....
Our recruiting would suffer greatly…hard enough to get recruits now…would be even harder with Rhule.This is what Penn State needs.
Outside of folks here, I don’t know one alum personally who likes him as coach. When I meet Penn Staters, they almost always mention that they don’t think he’s a good coach. This started about three to four years ago (when I would defend Franklin).
Because most PSU fans are delusional and still think it’s 1985 playing an independent schedule with 120 scholarship players. News flash for PSU fans, our last national championship was 36 years ago. The CFP has changed the college football world and going to a good bowl game with a 10-2 record is no longer viewed as being successful. That is the new reality.
Is that topPenn State's schedules in the 1980s were far more rigorous than what they have faced in recent years. Not even close.
38 Top 20 opponents (they only "ranked" 20 teams back then, as you'll remember) over that 10 year stretch in the 1980s.
Over the last 9 years, 29 Top 20 opponents - and that is with an extra game in the schedule.
So, essentially, one more quality team each year, and two fewer cupcakes each year, in the 1980s vs the last 9 years.
Is that top
20 opponents when we played them or where they ended up ranked?
Post Season Top-20 Ranked Opponents:Is that top
20 opponents when we played them or where they ended up ranked?
I will say this. I have found playing the Big10 to be more difficult than playing the independent schedule. Maybe the familiarity? I don’t know, but it has been more difficult than I anticipated.Post Season Top-20 Ranked Opponents:
1980's - 41 (net of 3 more than "when we played them", though there were several both dropping out, or rising up)
Last 9 Years - 29 (same total net number, though some teams dropped out - like Wisconsin 2021, and some teams climbed in - like Indiana 2020, Top 20)
The 85 scholarship limit has resulted in a bit more parity. That didn't take effect until 1993.I will say this. I have found playing the Big10 to be more difficult than playing the independent schedule. Maybe the familiarity? I don’t know, but it has been more difficult than I anticipated.
How do those numbers look in the 90s under Joe and the 2000s before Joe was fired?
Outside looking in reading both PSUFTG and your comments respectively, I think the College Football landscape has changed drastically from the time we played the Independent schedule and the Big10 now.I will say this. I have found playing the Big10 to be more difficult than playing the independent schedule. Maybe the familiarity? I don’t know, but it has been more difficult than I anticipated.
How do those numbers look in the 90s under Joe and the 2000s before Joe was fired?
Well, I guess I'm an idiot.
This is a critical point that I think a lot of people miss when comparing eras. With where OSU is, and with PSU being in their division, we essentially have one game every single year where we are decisive underdog and are expected to lose (on paper). Having that on the schedule every single year is a burden. Back in the 80s and 90s there weren't any teams as consistently dominant as Bama and OSU have been recently. That changes the whole landscape of the discussion. Teams that don't have to face the few dynasty programs every season have an inherit advantage over everyone that is part of the Big 10 East or SEC West.I think the Independent schedule when we played it was very challenging maybe even more so because the talent was spread, out not like now with this generation of frontrunner and bandwagon children.
It's not as if Baylor was nothing before he got there. From 2011-2016 they went ... 10-3, 8-5, 11-2, 11-2, 10-3, 7-6. Even Temple was 9-4, 8-4, 9-4, 4-7 before he got there. In both cases, Rhule took a squad with recent success, bottomed them out and then rebounded the squad.Rhule is a roll up the sleeves guy, blue collar and can grind. Carolina was a terrible fit...
Auburn is a red-headed step child to Bama...they need a Rhule type of guy to Rebuild. Franklin and Dabo, you think they are roll up sleeve grinders?
They are community organizers lol they need big name places to be successful. Much like Deon--everyone thinks Deon can win a NAtty anyhwere uh NO. Good Luck with that...back to Rhule look at what he has done in re-building programs, he has shown progression success;
2013 Temple 2–10
2014 Temple 6–6
2015 Temple 10–4 Conference 7–1 1st (East) L Boca Raton
2016 Temple 10–3 Conference 7–1 1st (East) Military
2017 Baylor 1–11
2018 Baylor 7–6 Conference 4-5 W Texas
2019 Baylor 11–3 Conference 8–1 2nd L Sugar
This is what Auburn Needs....
In the 1980s:This is a critical point that I think a lot of people miss when comparing eras. With where OSU is, and with PSU being in their division, we essentially have one game every single year where we are decided underdog and are expected to lose (on paper). Having that on the schedule every single year is a burden. Back in the 80s and 90s there weren't any teams as consistently dominant as Bama and OSU have been recently. That changes the whole landscape of the discussion. Teams that don't have to face the few dynasty programs every season have an inherit advantage over everyone that is part of the Big 10 East or SEC West.
Interesting data...ThanksIn the 1980s:
The Top 10 Teams of the decade won 73% or more of their games (2 teams won 80% or more)
In the 1990s:
The Top 10 Teams won 75% or more of their games (5 teams won 80% or more)
In the 2000s:
The Top 10 Teams won 73% or more of their games (4 teams won 80% or more)
In the 2010s:
The Top 10 Teams won 73% or more of their games (5 teams won 80% or more)
It would be abundantly difficult to argue that "talent" has been any more, or any less, dispersed from any one decade to the other - or that the dominant teams of any of those eras were any more or less dominant than those of any other era.
The Big Dogs may change, but the margin between Big and Little Dog remains the same.
Win percentage computation form (stassen.com)