FC: Is football worth it?

cjrugger

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2022
2,321
4,744
113
If a college sports program, any college sports program, loses money it can't pay for anything else. Beyond that,It's not necessarily an all or nothing proposition. As I read the post I responded to, it suggested that some P5 schools may eventually decide there's little value or point in trying to compete in an arena where enormous amounts of money there are neither willing or able to spend are required for coaches, players, and athletes with limited hope of success. I added the question of uncertain benefit to the school of operating such a program. That doesn't necessarily mean dropping the sport altogether; it could mean competing at a G5 or FCS level. In that environment, you have more true "student athletes" and the football program isn't expected to be a cash machine.
Pitt football makes money. The other sports lose money and football subsidizes them. Cancelling football doesn’t make sense. Dropping down to a level where the team will also lose money doesn’t make sense either
 

PSUFTG

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,478
2,330
113
They ran a deficit because the prior fiscal year had 8 home games and the current one had 6, and they had to pay a large buyout for a basketball coach. This article is making a connection that isn't really the cause of the deficit at all, but why not just make up some BS? It's a one off situation for OSU that probably isn't much of a concern. Journalism is dead.
One less home game?

One less home game, for OSU, is - IIRC - about $7-8 Million in revenue. Maybe a bit more.
That only explains, obviously, a small fraction of the deficit.

They lost money - a lot of it - and would have lost a lot of money whether with 6 or 7 (or 8, as they will have next year) home games.


All that said, that was a very poorly written/researched article.
 
Last edited:

PSUFTG

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,478
2,330
113
Pitt football makes money. The other sports lose money and football subsidizes them. Cancelling football doesn’t make sense. Dropping down to a level where the team will also lose money doesn’t make sense either
The more likely reason teams may "drop down" will not be because their football programs aren't making money (for the reasons you stated, which are accurate). They are not going to willingly drop from a level that makes them X dollars - only to go to a level that makes them "Something less than X" dollars.
It will, much more likely, be forced relegation when their presence in a conference costs their COHORTS money (like when Temple football was kicked out of the Big East - when the Big East was still a thing). There are, of course, plenty of programs in P4 conferences that don't carry their weight - and cost their cohorts money (that is a simple mathematical certainty). So long as those drains (taxes on the big boys) remain relatively minor, no one will lose sleep. When they become larger, and/or the margins for everyone become tougher to keep fat, then you will see exit doors being opened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midnighter

cjrugger

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2022
2,321
4,744
113
The more likely reason teams may "drop down" will not be because their football programs aren't making money (for the reasons you stated, which are accurate). They are not going to willingly drop from a level that makes them X dollars - only to go to a level that makes them "Something less than X" dollars.
It will, much more likely, be forced relegation when their presence in a conference costs their COHORTS money (like when Temple football was kicked out of the Big East - when the Big East was still a thing). There are, of course, plenty of programs in P4 conferences that don't carry their weight - and cost their cohorts money (that is a simple mathematical certainty). So long as those drains (taxes on the big boys) remain relatively minor, no one will lose sleep. When they become larger, and/or the margins for everyone become tougher to keep fat, then you will see exit doors being opened.
I don’t see that happening. A big part of the reason the TV contracts are huge is because the conference has so many games to sell. If you reduce your inventory, the total price is going to go down. Maybe it goes down by a small enough amount that the average goes up, but that’s a dangerous bet. I also bet the powerhouse football teams don’t mind having some punching bags on the bottom of the conference. OSU and PSU don’t want to play a top 25 team every week and I bet they enjoy the semi-bye week when Purdue comes to town
 

bdgan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,326
2,266
113
I'll make a bet right now that zero P4 teams (it's not P5 anymore with the PAC12 decimated) drop their football program. You name the time period. 2 years? 4 years? $100 to the winner's charity of choice. We on?
No
 

bdgan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,326
2,266
113
I'll make a bet right now that zero P4 teams (it's not P5 anymore with the PAC12 decimated) drop their football program. You name the time period. 2 years? 4 years? $100 to the winner's charity of choice. We on?
BiG schools will hang on as long as revenue is shared. Without revenue sharing I wouldn't be so sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midnighter

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,900
15,776
113
BiG schools will hang on as long as revenue is shared. Without revenue sharing I wouldn't be so sure.

Every big time school saw ND keep all their money. What benefit does conference revenue sharing to schools like OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and USC? Don’t need a conference to play each other…
 

ApexLion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
4,096
7,031
113
I trust you'll cease complaining if he doesn't?
I'm glad you asked.

Everything has a season, a change.

My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nitt1300

cjrugger

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2022
2,321
4,744
113
I'm glad you asked.

Everything has a season, a change.

My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
Don't wait. Get a head start now
 

laKavosiey-st lion

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
9,098
6,445
113
I'm glad you asked.

Everything has a season, a change.

My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
Everything has a season, a change.

Something cowherd says all the time is he reserves the right to alter his opinion as things change. Big game Jim is no longer a problem for me cause of the new playoff format. Adding a west coast vaca once a year is icing.
 

bdgan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
2,326
2,266
113
Every big time school saw ND keep all their money. What benefit does conference revenue sharing to schools like OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and USC? Don’t need a conference to play each other…
Do you really think those schools will become independent? None of them is going to get a ND type TV contract on their own.

Another thing to consider is that PSU makes out on MBB revenue sharing. They will also get playoff money every year even if the miss the playoffs. ND doesn't have that security.
 

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,209
9,900
113
I'm glad you asked.

Everything has a season, a change.

My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
I'm not so far from that position. It's been a while since I lived or died over a game. I loved it, but college football has been dying for decades.
 

PSUSignore

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
911
1,518
93
One less home game?

One less home game, for OSU, is - IIRC - about $7-8 Million in revenue. Maybe a bit more.
That only explains, obviously, a small fraction of the deficit.

They lost money - a lot of it - and would have lost a lot of money whether with 6 or 7 (or 8, as they will have next year) home games.


All that said, that was a very poorly written/researched article.
8 - 6 = 2
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bosco2

PSUSignore

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
911
1,518
93
Every big time school saw ND keep all their money. What benefit does conference revenue sharing to schools like OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and USC? Don’t need a conference to play each other…
Because in years ND doesn't make the playoff they get zero. That is unlikely to happen to any Big 10 school under the 12 team playoff model.
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,900
15,776
113
Because in years ND doesn't make the playoff they get zero. That is unlikely to happen to any Big 10 school under the 12 team playoff model.

So, the B1G split $46mm in playoff money. That’s $2.6mm split evenly amongst every Big Ten school. ND got $20mm; can do the math, but would take the BIG putting four teams in the playoffs (with two reaching the final four) 8 years in a row for PSU to make that.
 
Last edited:

SleepyLion

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2022
1,392
1,832
113
So, the B1G split $46mm in playoff money. That’s $2.6mm split evenly amongst every Big Ten school. ND got $20mm; can do the math, but would take the BIG putting four teams in the playoffs (with two reaching the final four) 8 years in a row to make that.
This is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.
 

Countrylion

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
2,845
5,384
113
I'm not so far from that position. It's been a while since I lived or died over a game. I loved it, but college football has been dying for decades.
College football dying or using college players and not paying them anything is dying? College football is a multi billion dollar industry and you want to stiff the people who make it possible. You should check out now if you cannot bring yourself to compensate the people who make it all possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grant Green

leinbacker

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2021
2,075
3,355
113
College football dying or using college players and not paying them anything is dying? College football is a multi billion dollar industry and you want to stiff the people who make it possible. You should check out now if you cannot bring yourself to compensate the people who make it all possible.

Who says players can’t be compensated? It’s the free agency even before the season ends that helps kill it. Wouldn’t it have been nice to have Beau available in the playoffs.

Also time the non profit status be removed. They want to run it like a business, tax it like one.
 

Blair10

Well-known member
Nov 14, 2021
1,251
2,374
113

Former UCLA Football coach Henry Russell Sanders said: “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing”.

I can‘t think of a single LSU or Alabama fan who remembers the athletic budget condition after any of Nick Saban’s 7 National Championships. All fans remember the thrill of victory and being Number One.

Bottom line, yes, Football is worth it. As the late Al Davis would say, “Just win baby!”.
 

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
17,772
26,802
113
This is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.

Exactly. What’s with the f*cking communism?

o_O
 

JohnJumba

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
796
549
93
The inherent problem with college football is that it is unfair. Outside of maybe scholarship limits, there is absolutely nothing in place to ensure even the hint of a level playing field. Will be interesting to see the first 'mid' tier Power 5 team to call it quits and I believe it will happen. Can Pitt afford to compete at a continuing loss? Duke? How long will conferences keep dead weight they have to share revenue with?

That sad bus ride back to joakland.
 

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,209
9,900
113
College football dying or using college players and not paying them anything is dying? College football is a multi billion dollar industry and you want to stiff the people who make it possible. You should check out now if you cannot bring yourself to compensate the people who make it all possible.
Did you even read what I said? I said decades.
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
9,900
15,776
113
This is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.

And that is why at some point soon, I predict the dead weight will cut football or move to a more regional model. Why should the big dogs share with them? It makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SleepyLion