This is a top contender for the stupidest opinion everboth agree the title is tainted due to the michigan loss. So not worth it to them.
This is a top contender for the stupidest opinion everboth agree the title is tainted due to the michigan loss. So not worth it to them.
Pitt football makes money. The other sports lose money and football subsidizes them. Cancelling football doesn’t make sense. Dropping down to a level where the team will also lose money doesn’t make sense eitherIf a college sports program, any college sports program, loses money it can't pay for anything else. Beyond that,It's not necessarily an all or nothing proposition. As I read the post I responded to, it suggested that some P5 schools may eventually decide there's little value or point in trying to compete in an arena where enormous amounts of money there are neither willing or able to spend are required for coaches, players, and athletes with limited hope of success. I added the question of uncertain benefit to the school of operating such a program. That doesn't necessarily mean dropping the sport altogether; it could mean competing at a G5 or FCS level. In that environment, you have more true "student athletes" and the football program isn't expected to be a cash machine.
This is a top contender for the stupidest opinion ever
There's the key. Do any of us care what non-alum PSU fans think?Neither are alumni of OSU.
And drafts at Zeno’s went up a buck! For fvcks sake!!!We just made our defensive coordinator the highest-paid in the land. It had better be worth it.
Only if they are major financial contributors and then it is only slightly discounted.There's the key. Do any of us care what non-alum PSU fans think?
No![]()
Ohio State paid a bigger price than we thought to win a national championship
Ohio State's athletic department redefined the meaning of going all in and then some to win a national title. It better have been worth it.fansided.com
There's the key. Do any of us care what non-alum PSU fans think?
One less home game?They ran a deficit because the prior fiscal year had 8 home games and the current one had 6, and they had to pay a large buyout for a basketball coach. This article is making a connection that isn't really the cause of the deficit at all, but why not just make up some BS? It's a one off situation for OSU that probably isn't much of a concern. Journalism is dead.
The more likely reason teams may "drop down" will not be because their football programs aren't making money (for the reasons you stated, which are accurate). They are not going to willingly drop from a level that makes them X dollars - only to go to a level that makes them "Something less than X" dollars.Pitt football makes money. The other sports lose money and football subsidizes them. Cancelling football doesn’t make sense. Dropping down to a level where the team will also lose money doesn’t make sense either
I don’t see that happening. A big part of the reason the TV contracts are huge is because the conference has so many games to sell. If you reduce your inventory, the total price is going to go down. Maybe it goes down by a small enough amount that the average goes up, but that’s a dangerous bet. I also bet the powerhouse football teams don’t mind having some punching bags on the bottom of the conference. OSU and PSU don’t want to play a top 25 team every week and I bet they enjoy the semi-bye week when Purdue comes to townThe more likely reason teams may "drop down" will not be because their football programs aren't making money (for the reasons you stated, which are accurate). They are not going to willingly drop from a level that makes them X dollars - only to go to a level that makes them "Something less than X" dollars.
It will, much more likely, be forced relegation when their presence in a conference costs their COHORTS money (like when Temple football was kicked out of the Big East - when the Big East was still a thing). There are, of course, plenty of programs in P4 conferences that don't carry their weight - and cost their cohorts money (that is a simple mathematical certainty). So long as those drains (taxes on the big boys) remain relatively minor, no one will lose sleep. When they become larger, and/or the margins for everyone become tougher to keep fat, then you will see exit doors being opened.
NoI'll make a bet right now that zero P4 teams (it's not P5 anymore with the PAC12 decimated) drop their football program. You name the time period. 2 years? 4 years? $100 to the winner's charity of choice. We on?
BiG schools will hang on as long as revenue is shared. Without revenue sharing I wouldn't be so sure.I'll make a bet right now that zero P4 teams (it's not P5 anymore with the PAC12 decimated) drop their football program. You name the time period. 2 years? 4 years? $100 to the winner's charity of choice. We on?
BiG schools will hang on as long as revenue is shared. Without revenue sharing I wouldn't be so sure.
I'm glad you asked.I trust you'll cease complaining if he doesn't?
Don't wait. Get a head start nowI'm glad you asked.
Everything has a season, a change.
My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
Everything has a season, a change.I'm glad you asked.
Everything has a season, a change.
My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
I'll take that under advisement. thanksDon't wait. Get a head start now
Do you really think those schools will become independent? None of them is going to get a ND type TV contract on their own.Every big time school saw ND keep all their money. What benefit does conference revenue sharing to schools like OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and USC? Don’t need a conference to play each other…
I'm not so far from that position. It's been a while since I lived or died over a game. I loved it, but college football has been dying for decades.I'm glad you asked.
Everything has a season, a change.
My plan: after this season and one more offseason of PSU 'buying/renting kids' to wear the Blue and White, I'm stopping my BWI subscription and I'll stop following the program. I spend too much time as it is on Penn State. After nearly 60 years of support, it's time to do something else imho. Happy to attend lower division games and I would really like to see Army-Navy once. But that's about it for college football for me after this season. Hope Franklin can do it this year.
8 - 6 = 2One less home game?
One less home game, for OSU, is - IIRC - about $7-8 Million in revenue. Maybe a bit more.
That only explains, obviously, a small fraction of the deficit.
They lost money - a lot of it - and would have lost a lot of money whether with 6 or 7 (or 8, as they will have next year) home games.
All that said, that was a very poorly written/researched article.
Because in years ND doesn't make the playoff they get zero. That is unlikely to happen to any Big 10 school under the 12 team playoff model.Every big time school saw ND keep all their money. What benefit does conference revenue sharing to schools like OSU, Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, and USC? Don’t need a conference to play each other…
Because in years ND doesn't make the playoff they get zero. That is unlikely to happen to any Big 10 school under the 12 team playoff model.
This is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.So, the B1G split $46mm in playoff money. That’s $2.6mm split evenly amongst every Big Ten school. ND got $20mm; can do the math, but would take the BIG putting four teams in the playoffs (with two reaching the final four) 8 years in a row to make that.
Yeah bit Rutgers gives us the entire NYC marketThis is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.
College football dying or using college players and not paying them anything is dying? College football is a multi billion dollar industry and you want to stiff the people who make it possible. You should check out now if you cannot bring yourself to compensate the people who make it all possible.I'm not so far from that position. It's been a while since I lived or died over a game. I loved it, but college football has been dying for decades.
College football dying or using college players and not paying them anything is dying? College football is a multi billion dollar industry and you want to stiff the people who make it possible. You should check out now if you cannot bring yourself to compensate the people who make it all possible.
![]()
Ohio State paid a bigger price than we thought to win a national championship
Ohio State's athletic department redefined the meaning of going all in and then some to win a national title. It better have been worth it.fansided.com
This is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.
The inherent problem with college football is that it is unfair. Outside of maybe scholarship limits, there is absolutely nothing in place to ensure even the hint of a level playing field. Will be interesting to see the first 'mid' tier Power 5 team to call it quits and I believe it will happen. Can Pitt afford to compete at a continuing loss? Duke? How long will conferences keep dead weight they have to share revenue with?
That’s like 4 oz soy milk lattes and no jam or cream for your scone for everyone .Exactly. What’s with the f*cking communism?
![]()
Did you even read what I said? I said decades.College football dying or using college players and not paying them anything is dying? College football is a multi billion dollar industry and you want to stiff the people who make it possible. You should check out now if you cannot bring yourself to compensate the people who make it all possible.
This is why the "dead weight" of the conference should be cut. The chances that PUR, RUT, etc. will ever contribute to that $46mm is not very high, but they are given an equal share just the same.