Interesting comments from UNC AD. Seems to be in the thought of waiting this thing out, and making it as good of a situation as they can until 2036. Then assess options. I thought his comment about FSU was a vailed threat. We now know of at least one school that won't be voting in favor of a reduced settlement for FSU.
"You don't have to have the most money to win. And I think we've demonstrated that in every sport that we have."
"If Florida State thinks that they have greater value than our league and want to leave, wouldn't we ask to share in the upside of that greater value?” Cunningham said. “So I'm not sure that $500 [million] is going to be enough. So maybe it's $600 or $700 million to get out of the league. I don't know."
"I think our obligation to the ACC is to be the best partner with our conference that we can possibly be,” Cunningham said. “I also think that we have to look at what is in the best interest of the university today and going forward. And I think you can do both. I think you can be a great partner and say, we're going to do everything we can to support this league. And maybe if we can get more into the ACC Network, support the ACC Network, drive subscribers, get more digital content that we can have direct to consumer relationships, that's what we should be working on. If it benefits the league, great.
“At the same time, what's going on nationally and how do we put ourselves in the best position between now, 2036 and beyond? Being good stewards of the revenues and resources that we have, having great teams that compete at the highest level and recognizing we're in a state that is not in some of the other leagues, either, long-term that is going to be a real asset to us. But when does that occur? I don't have a timetable on that."
The UNC athletic director shared his thoughts on conference realignment and growing revenue disparities in an interview with Inside Carolina.
247sports.com