Game Thread
- Thread starter Lurker123
- Start date
It was zone left. He wasn’t supposed to. That was on the qb. Also the play call was predictable as all get out.
Better than the aTm game last season. Wasn’t the first half total for that one 34?
Yeah, but Satty is too smart to just try to get a first down. He wanted it all!
At the least, it’s close. If we had even a mediocre offense, we’d have 21 points. The only thing that keeps UK in this game is going up against a laughably putrid offense. And that’s what we have.
And Beamer just keeps cheerleading. SOS would've bit that guy's head off.
This is after a week and a half of preparation. We have a lot to look forward to the balance of the season.
"He's been in situations like this before. He'll be fine". Rattler is exactly what I told you he was. A loser.
Why? I mean, it’s up to people to decide if they want to show up. But what have you seen tonight that makes you say “yeah, I want to go see that team play”
We're so predictable. You know when we are going to run it and when we are going to pass it. Sometimes you know what play is coming just by how we line up. Rattler has to stop being a nancy boy. He could have 50 yards running if he would just pull it every now and then.
We will make mistakes and it will cost us the game. The defense isn't shutting them down but they're making plays when needed. Hopefully we can shape it up in the 2nd half.
We will make mistakes and it will cost us the game. The defense isn't shutting them down but they're making plays when needed. Hopefully we can shape it up in the 2nd half.
Don’t need to. Punishing the team by not supporting them? Not much of a fan.
So don’t touch anybody and the RB gets run down? Brilliant
don’t care what you call it if the RT isn’t doing much for the “zone left” , since we can’t run - you might want to block the DE right in front of you
we need all the help we can get
And yet showing up, spending money and acting like this is great allows the administration to continue without any pressure to make changes.
It's always a tough debate, but there's merit on both sides.
What do we do with our SEC money and why does none of it manifest itself into a satisfactory game day product?
The SEC TV contracts allow bottom feeders to stay at the bottom because, win or lose, the athletic department still gets the funding they need to run all the sports programs. I think money is all that matters to Tanner, so hitting him there is the only thing that might get him to change what he's doing. I agree that not attending games is a bit heavy-handed and punishes the players too, so maybe not buying season tickets and not funding the Gamecock Club might be a better approach.
I'm sorry Beamer didn't have us in the top 10 in 18 games.
Don't romanticize being a fan. The program doesn't care about you. They only want your money. It's a business relationship. They offer entertainment, funded by the fans. If the entertainment sucks, why keep giving it money. It would be like going to see a movie at the theater and thinking it sucks. Then turning around going back to see the same movie next week, thinking it sucks again. Then going back the next week to see it again.
I'm pretty sure the bumbling mess we've been watching is in no danger of being in the top 40.
Sends a very loud message to the decision makers, my man.
Last man on the line opposite the zone call belongs to the QB ole boy.
Top 10? All I'm asking for is a TD here and there. Is that unreasonable?