Typical, albeit short, glfr response to a 6pack voting thread. Never change.Classic SPS political voting thread.
This thread reads like a wild roller coaster ride filled with ups, downs, and loops. Claims of voting fraud, claims of intentional voter suppression to create doubt, and claims of 2020.
Never change.
More likely that a precinct or three ordered the exact same number of ballots as 4 years ago (because it's unlikely they're doing any actual thinking), and didn't realize the state had combined their precinct with another (to reduce voting locations and make voting harder). Same number of ballots, twice the voters.I don’t want to disillusion you on election night but our public servants in Jackson sometimes don’t do the best work…perhaps they didn’t pay the ballot printer. Completely plausible.
Yep.That's one of the areas that ran out of ballots.
Eh. Not really.Looking at what's left out there, this will be very close. It's nearly all in Hinds county
That's surprising. I know almost 50k votes is a huge hurdle at this point, but I would think it's going to get down a good bit with where the ballots are still outstanding. I would definitely bet good money that he wouldn't overcome it, but I wouldn't bet the house on it or anything.
I'm sure they've done the math and know a lot better, but still surprising.
I think the math doesn't add up. It's being reported that the vote in heavier dem precincts in hinds are all fully in.
we know full well there wouldn't be a concession if Presley thought he had a snowballs chance of winning or forcing a runoff.
And why is this? Conspiracy theorists are batting close to 1.000 against establishment / MSM narrative since 2020.I guess this is what every election will be like now. Conspiracy theories and fraud
This is the world we live in now thanks to tub-o-lard that lost the GA gov race Way back when. I’m sure she makes her friends call her “governor”.I don’t have words for how much I hate the fact that if there is even a hiccup in the election process, even one that is immediately found and fixed, it immediately turns into the Illuminati is stealing the election.
Seems to have been that way since the Russians started it back in 2016I guess this is what every election will be like now. Conspiracy theories and fraud
You act like we live in a world with no voter fraud.Classic SPS political voting thread.
This thread reads like a wild roller coaster ride filled with ups, downs, and loops. Claims of voting fraud, claims of intentional voter suppression to create doubt, and claims of 2020.
Never change.
100%? Damn. That’s impressive. So every conspiracy theory out there has been correct? Every single one? Color me impressed. Also, I just want to point out that Fox News has far more viewers than the other networks, so referring to the “liberal” networks as the “mainstream media” becomes more and more comical with each passing day.And why is this? Conspiracy theorists are batting close to 1.000 against establishment / MSM narrative since 2020.
Read what you wrote again.That “news” company paid an almost billion dollar settlement because it was 100% right about a conspiracy involving voting machines.
That is the scariest statement I will read on the internet today. I’m going back to the sports threads. I should have known better.Um, Fox is MSM. 100% does not equal "close to 100%". Nice try though.
Classic glfr post… gaslights the right by claiming obvious misdeeds by the left are simply figments of their imagination brought on by their own blinding hatred, bigotry and bias.Classic SPS political voting thread.
This thread reads like a wild roller coaster ride filled with ups, downs, and loops. Claims of voting fraud, claims of intentional voter suppression to create doubt, and claims of 2020.
Never change.
I saw somewhere that state law requires that you have enough ballots for 65% of the registered voters. That’s actually sad. It would be great if we had things that could electronically allow voting and we weren’t dependent on printed materials. Maybe in our Jetson future such things might exist…More likely that a precinct or three ordered the exact same number of ballots as 4 years ago (because it's unlikely they're doing any actual thinking), and didn't realize the state had combined their precinct with another (to reduce voting locations and make voting harder). Same number of ballots, twice the voters.
There should be some provision in state law for when polls screw up that allows people to still vote. If it delays results so be it. That would eliminate the conspiracy theories around why there weren’t enough ballots. The most obvious answer is incompetence, but people should have the chance to vote regardless.I guess this is what every election will be like now. Conspiracy theories and fraud
You accidentally replaced your zero with a oneAnd why is this? Conspiracy theorists are batting close to 1.000 against establishment / MSM narrative since 2020.
That’s certainly the most aggressive election denying I can recall!***This is the world we live in now thanks to tub-o-lard that lost the GA gov race Way back when. I’m sure she makes her friends call her “governor”.
I belief was if Hood could not win, it will be hard for any other Democrat could win. Hood was the best chance the Democrats have. The only reason it was close was because of all the outside money.Probably thought Tate was more vulnerable than Delbert. And they don't have a lot of options for people to run. Presley has done incredible considering he's just a public service commissioner and also a massive *** hole. But that's pretty much as good as the resumes get for Mississippi democrats and the bench gets worse after that.
If Presley doesn't win this time, going to be interesting in four years as there's not an obvious successor on the republican side.
Contesting elections has been en vogue since the days of Al Gore. He took his case all the way to SCOTUS. John Kerry tried to contest Ohio in 2004. Hillary Clinton straight up called the process illegitimate in 16. Stacey Abrams has made a career and has gotten rich off of it.Seems to have been that way since the Russians started it back in 2016
Seriously. And not even waiting until the votes are fully counted. In the moment, while voting is open, conspiracy and fraud are claimed. I mean, the result wasnt even claimed yet. At least wait to see what the result is before claiming fraud.I guess this is what every election will be like now. Conspiracy theories and fraud
And why is this? Conspiracy theorists are batting close to 1.000 against establishment / MSM narrative since 2020.
Um, Fox is MSM. 100% does not equal "close to 100%". Nice try though.
You left off "unless you're a democrat."Seriously. And not even waiting until the votes are fully counted. In the moment, while voting is open, conspiracy and fraud are claimed. I mean, the result wasnt even claimed yet. At least wait to see what the result is before claiming fraud.
Cart before the horse and whatnot.
I know you are not in Miss but both parties were upset about what happened and both parties file injunction. Both parties were suspicious. Democrats' injunction was to keep the polls open for another hour. Republicans did not fight that because the biggest issue was Clinton and Clinton probably the last baston of Republicans in Hinds County. What the Republican filed an injunction for was for that no one who was not in line at 7:00 could not get into line and vote.Ok, so if Fox is MSM, then that means the MSM both claimed election fraud in 2020(Fox) and disputed election fraud in 2020(literally every other major/mainstream media outlet I can think of).
Accepting this insane claim as legitimate, are you then saying that anyone who disagreed with both Fox and all other MSM outlets and claimed conspiracy was behind the media's claims was then close to 100% correct?
Here is what I think- you didnt actually fully form an opinion that stands up to even simple scrutiny before you posted it here. You then responded with a clarification that lets your initial comment stand, but with even a simple amount of thinking, your response makes your initial comment sound straight up crazy.
How did I do? Pretty accurate, right? Close to batting 1.000 perhaps?
Nah, too much common sense. And even it were to ever happen, it's going to have to be with a Republican in office, no Democrat will touch it. So, I hope the Republicans learned their lesson on how to win an election under these current rules.Contesting elections has been en vogue since the days of Al Gore. He took his case all the way to SCOTUS. John Kerry tried to contest Ohio in 2004. Hillary Clinton straight up called the process illegitimate in 16. Stacey Abrams has made a career and has gotten rich off of it.
Trump and Kari Lake in AZ were clown shows in 20. But the media handled them much differently.
When a democrat does it, it's a reasonable part of the process. When a republican does it, it's an insurrection.
We should federalize elections. One standard. Cameras at every ballot drop box. Poll watchers from both parties at every station. ID required for voting. Votes counted by 10PM local time in every state. Remove the nonsense from both sides.
Well, the sitting republican president fomented, at a minimum, the storming of the capitol. To pretend that what happened on 1/6 is even close to what has happened in the entirety of the history of our nation regarding election denial/protest is disingenuous. It has literally never happened before. Hopefully not again. The mob that recently went to the capitol in support of Palestine got pretty rowdy and I felt like they should have been dealt with more directly, but they did not take over the capitol. They were not, however, specifically there to try to stop the electoral process. I do think that the far left presents just as much danger as the far right.Contesting elections has been en vogue since the days of Al Gore. He took his case all the way to SCOTUS. John Kerry tried to contest Ohio in 2004. Hillary Clinton straight up called the process illegitimate in 16. Stacey Abrams has made a career and has gotten rich off of it.
Trump and Kari Lake in AZ were clown shows in 20. But the media handled them much differently.
When a democrat does it, it's a reasonable part of the process. When a republican does it, it's an insurrection.
We should federalize elections. One standard. Cameras at every ballot drop box. Poll watchers from both parties at every station. ID required for voting. Votes counted by 10PM local time in every state. Remove the nonsense from both sides.
I don't like the idea of cameras on voters, but if it's just on the "final" box, sure. Otherwise I can get behind all of this. It would cost some money to make the 10pm part happen in some places due to sheer volume, but if you standardize it across the country you'd think there would be plenty savings to be found as well.We should federalize elections. One standard. Cameras at every ballot drop box. Poll watchers from both parties at every station. ID required for voting. Votes counted by 10PM local time in every state. Remove the nonsense from both sides.
When a democrat does it, it's a reasonable part of the process. When a republican does it, it's an insurrection.
It was a rally in which a few people got violent. Much less in scale than the social justice riots of 2020, but much more in opportunity to leverage by a dishonest media to dunk on republicans. Nobody "took over" the capital. The capital police were cooperative with the protestors. Narratives and facts on the ground don't completely align.Well, the sitting republican president fomented, at a minimum, the storming of the capitol. To pretend that what happened on 1/6 is even close to what has happened in the entirety of the history of our nation regarding election denial/protest is disingenuous. It has literally never happened before. Hopefully not again. The mob that recently went to the capitol in support of Palestine got pretty rowdy and I felt like they should have been dealt with more directly, but they did not take over the capitol. They were not, however, specifically there to try to stop the electoral process. I do think that the far left presents just as much danger as the far right.
There has always been voter fraud. There is WAY less now than there used to be.You act like we live in a world with no voter fraud.
Have you not seen the reports out of NJ and Conn with the ballot stuffers?
See, we can agree on common sense proposals. My camera proposal was only for the final box/ballot drop off.I don't like the idea of cameras on voters, but if it's just on the "final" box, sure. Otherwise I can get behind all of this. It would cost some money to make the 10pm part happen in some places due to sheer volume, but if you standardize it across the country you'd think there would be plenty savings to be found as well.
ETA: You can already have poll watchers at every precinct, at least in locations I'm aware of. You don't see them much bc who wants to do that? I guess you could make it paid like poll workers, but they have a really hard time finding those folks as well.