Hosts are 1-8 in RPI, 11-15, 18, 22, and 31

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,893
929
113
So not as strictly by RPI as in the last few years.

1 Tennessee
2 Texas A&M
3 Kentucky
4 North Carolina
5 Arkansas
6 Georgia
7 Clemson
8 Florida State

9 Wake Forest
10 Indiana State
11 Oklahoma State
12 Virginia
13 UC Santa Barbara
14 Oklahoma
15 NC State
16 Duke
17 Dallas Baptist
18 Oregon State
19 San Diego
20 Vanderbilt
21 South Carolina
22 East Carolina
23 LSU
24 Alabama
25 Mississippi State
26 Southern Miss
27 UC Irvine
28 Nebraska
29 Louisiana Tech
30 Florida
31 Arizona
 

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
Lots more people should be pissrd than us. But very clear the 16th spot had flaws. Rewseding a team that won both regular and conference tournament isn’t that far fetched
 

Barkman Turner Overdrive

Well-known member
May 28, 2006
3,764
1,582
113
So not as strictly by RPI as in the last few years.

1 Tennessee
2 Texas A&M
3 Kentucky
4 North Carolina
5 Arkansas
6 Georgia
7 Clemson
8 Florida State

9 Wake Forest
10 Indiana State
11 Oklahoma State
12 Virginia
13 UC Santa Barbara
14 Oklahoma
15 NC State

16 Duke
17 Dallas Baptist
18 Oregon State
19 San Diego
20 Vanderbilt
21 South Carolina
22 East Carolina
23 LSU
24 Alabama
25 Mississippi State
26 Southern Miss
27 UC Irvine
28 Nebraska
29 Louisiana Tech
30 Florida
31 Arizona
 

karlchilders.sixpack

Well-known member
Jun 5, 2008
17,667
2,275
113
Five out of the last Champions have come from the SEC, and They can't deal with it.
But, we will be in, somewhere.
 

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
3,989
4,317
113
Arizona was 3-9 in Q1 games, compared to our 16-14.

I was fully prepared not to be mad because I thought our RPI eliminated us. But now that we know that it didn't, WTF committee??
Yeah, Arizona is the WTF of the century. As is Indiana State not making it. What else did they need to do? I’d have taken Duke over NC State, too, but that’s a more minor quibble. Other than those first 2 though, no major surprises.
 

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
Being a champion matters. Can’t say I argue with it. Seems like it was the biggest tie breaker today
 

57stratdawg

Well-known member
Mar 24, 2010
28,215
3,841
113
I feel like the committee went “Conference Champion” and our schedule ultimately didn’t mean very much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Msuirondawgs

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
I feel like the committee went “Conference Champion” and our schedule ultimately didn’t mean very much.
It mattered the first 14 were locks. Last two it got muddy. If our resume was clearly better we would have been in. It wasnt.

defineatly agree… championships were the tie breaker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trojanbulldog19

57stratdawg

Well-known member
Mar 24, 2010
28,215
3,841
113
It mattered the first 14 were locks. Last two it got muddy. If our resume was clearly better we would have been in. It wasnt.

defineatly agree… championships were the tie breaker.
Pretty lazy by the committee. The bar for hosting for MSU was basically being the #1 overall seed, and none of this really mattered.

That’s like saying you’re open to buying any car that rhymes with Hadillac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eckie1 and onewoof

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,893
929
113
RPI matters except when it didn't. Winning your conference matters, except when it didn't. Geography matters, except when it didn't.

A conference champion with a top 10 RPI who would have been the only Northern team hosting didn't get that chance.
 

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
Pretty lazy by the committee. The bar for hosting for MSU was basically being the #1 overall seed, and none of this really mattered.

That’s like saying you’re open to buying any car that rhymes with Hadillac.
There was really 1 bad Choice in Arizona. And they decided to reward a team that won both regular season and conference championships

ecu is questionable but valid. The biggedt snub is indiana state, followed by Duke. It’s clear after seeing this we werent close to hosting…
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,632
3,661
113
So not as strictly by RPI as in the last few years.

1 Tennessee
2 Texas A&M
3 Kentucky
4 North Carolina
5 Arkansas
6 Georgia
7 Clemson
8 Florida State

9 Wake Forest
10 Indiana State
11 Oklahoma State
12 Virginia
13 UC Santa Barbara
14 Oklahoma
15 NC State

16 Duke
17 Dallas Baptist
18 Oregon State
19 San Diego
20 Vanderbilt
21 South Carolina
22 East Carolina
23 LSU
24 Alabama
25 Mississippi State
26 Southern Miss
27 UC Irvine
28 Nebraska
29 Louisiana Tech
30 Florida
31 Arizona
But absolutely matters to sec teams. Just tough to do it at 24
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,893
929
113
There was really 1 bad Choice in Arizona. And they decided to reward a team that won both regular season and conference championships

ecu is questionable but valid. The biggedt snub is indiana state, followed by Duke. It’s clear after seeing this we werent close to hosting…
Is it clear? Who can say? We could have easily been #18ish in the committee's eyes, or we might have been #28ish. There's just no consistency to make that judgment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Msuirondawgs

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
Is it clear? Who can say? We could have easily been #18ish in the committee's eyes, or we might have been #28ish. There's just no consistency to make that judgment.
my mistake it’s clear to me….

cant really argue us over Indy state or Duke.…IMO
 

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,221
4,784
113
Lots more people should be pissrd than us. But very clear the 16th spot had flaws. Rewseding a team that won both regular and conference tournament isn’t that far fetched
Trying to send out the pac12 out on a high note. Even though their baseball isn't was it has been.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulldogBlitz

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,221
4,784
113
It mattered the first 14 were locks. Last two it got muddy. If our resume was clearly better we would have been in. It wasnt.

defineatly agree… championships were the tie breaker.
Yes plain and simple if we don't want left out we cant leave doubt. We lost too many series we should have won. Ole Miss and Florida sting. Not sweeping Mizzou and Bama. Take care of games we had in the bag and we are national seed
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
Yes plain and simple if we don't want left out we can leave doubt. We lost two many series we should have won. Ole Miss and Florida sting. Not sweeping Mizzou and Bama. Take care of games we had in the bag and we are national seed
Or just play a real non conference schedule… this is all on us…. We can’t really blame the committee.… as you stated plenty of areas we can look back on and say if we woulda won this..
 

Msuirondawgs

Well-known member
Mar 18, 2023
818
675
93
There was really 1 bad Choice in Arizona. And they decided to reward a team that won both regular season and conference championships

ecu is questionable but valid. The biggedt snub is indiana state, followed by Duke. It’s clear after seeing this we werent close to hosting…
And you know the committee is probably gonna put LSU in Tucson. The return of little man Jay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skydawg1

onewoof

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2008
10,698
7,199
113
There was really 1 bad Choice in Arizona. And they decided to reward a team that won both regular season and conference championships

ecu is questionable but valid. The biggedt snub is indiana state, followed by Duke. It’s clear after seeing this we werent close to hosting…
Can you really have all 3 teams in the research triangle hosting though. That's just weird
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulldogBlitz

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
50,030
14,795
113
Or just play a real non conference schedule… this is all on us…. We can’t really blame the committee.… as you stated plenty of areas we can look back on and say if we woulda won this..
Agree. We absolutely deserve to host. But if we simply schedule a tournament or road series vs a halfway decent team instead of 3 at home vs Mount St Mary, we’re probably hosting.
 

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
And you know the committee is probably gonna put LSU in Tucson. The return of little man Jay.
I think we will be the 3rd or 4th highest rated 2 seed.

meaning we’ll go into the 12th or 13th seeds brackets which I think is either Oregon state or nc state

then would match up with an Texas am or Clemson in the supers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Msuirondawgs

11thEagleFan

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2015
2,769
1,244
113
State absolutely should’ve hosted, IMO.

With that said, literally about 8-10 teams have a better claim to hosting than Arizona. I’m borderline pissed that WE didn’t get a spot. Biggest head scratcher for a regional host that I can remember. Please send us to Tucson.
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,632
3,661
113
Agree. We absolutely deserve to host. But if we simply schedule a tournament or road series vs a halfway decent team instead of 3 at home vs Mount St Mary, we’re probably hosting.
And the scheduling thing is not a one off. They are not good at it. 2022 was even worse. The schedule they put together was going to require 15-16 sec wins just to get in the tournament.
 

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,893
929
113
Agree. We absolutely deserve to host. But if we simply schedule a tournament or road series vs a halfway decent team instead of 3 at home vs Mount St Mary, we’re probably hosting.
Probably, but then again who knows? If they'd followed RPI very closely like they have the last few years, I'd agree that we'd be hosting if we'd scheduled smarter and/or won a few more games.

But since they left out 2 top 10 teams and gave host bids to #22 and #31, who can say whether or not we would have gotten one if we'd gotten out RPI into the teens?
 

HuntDawg

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2018
2,901
1,405
113
Probably, but then again who knows? If they'd followed RPI very closely like they have the last few years, I'd agree that we'd be hosting if we'd scheduled smarter and/or won a few more games.

But since they left out 2 top 10 teams and gave host bids to #22 and #31, who can say whether or not we would have gotten one if we'd gotten out RPI into the teens?
14 of the top 18 teams hosted. 16 of the top 19 did last season

safe you say rpi is still really huge.

and for the committee to have some flexibility isn’t a bad thing.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login