Okay, comrades, I'm sold on this concept of "equity." Who is responsible for providing equity? Let's say one of my friends wants to be tall, smart, and handsome? Oh, and also wealthy? Who would he contact?
In the context of education tion, which is why I posted that illustration, only one of those 4 desires could be addressed.
And that's actually one of the ways to help improve education- provide equitable solutions to help more accurately address specific areas.
An example-
My school district purchased over 5000 Hotspots in the spring of '20 to help provide connectivity to students at home. In the subsequent 3 years, these Hotspots were funded by a government connectivity program, so they stayed active even though they were largely unused.
This is wasteful, obviously. And it needs to be made clear that this was happening across the country in districts large and small.
Anyways, the district is now paying for Hotspots out of pocket so the number has been greatly reduced.
If you have 500 Hotspots, how do you allocate them to 5 high schools and 10 middle schools?
- pass them out so each HS gets 50 and each MS gets 25?
- pass them out so each school gets 1 for every 40 students?
- identify groups that lack connectivity at home and allocate Hotspots to those who will utilize them the most?
The top two options make no sense but are 'equal'.
The bottom option will ensure higher utilization and is 'equitable'.
This program does not bring wealthier kids down. It does not lower standards.
All it does is provides critical connectivity to students that need it, to help improve their educational experience.
There are countless examples like this.