I agree, but your 5% escalation clause is nearly 2X the current CPI level if you max it out. That’s basically a free lunch for you at this point.
But the FED has two jobs: A) Manage Inflation & B) Full Employment. It doesn’t do any good to get ‘under 2%’ if it costs them employment.
Without googling it, I’m guessing we’ve seen a declining inflation levels something like 20 of the last 24 months. The discussion about rate cuts is better measured as ‘slower declines’ rather than inflation actually increasing.
The fed hasn't been drastic enough on rates. Inflation has declined because it had nowhere else to go, but the telling metric is that it's not declining at the rate that was expected. Meanwhile with all this talk of inflation "decline" the reality is that prices are still going up. You don't get to 300 lbs overnight, so you're not going to lose 100 lbs overnight but you can influence the pace through how drastic your diet is. The fed hasn't been drastic enough, probably because they're trying to protect Biden. But there are consequences to printing money and it affects all of us. Halfassing the mitigation helps nobody. If Biden won't address it with common sense policy changes, then the fed has to rip the bandaid off for him.
And by the way, we are nowhere close to full employment either. Deceptive jobs numbers that are constantly being revised down in the cloak of darkness should be a scandal. Most of the jobs added are part time and govt jobs.
The fed needs to get drastic. Like The Stones said, you can't always get what you want, but if you try you might find that you get what you need.