Is it time?

cockyferg

Active member
Jan 25, 2022
330
338
63
We have to hold onto recruits to have a chance to advance this program. Games like today won't help that's for sure. This was a very disappointing loss. I won't say embarrassing but it was close. Beamer has a lot of work to do to right this ship.
It was embarrassing. We can't sugar coat it. We blew a 10-point lead with like 4 and 1/2 minutes left because we couldn't get a single first down
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
This. This right here is the reason your program has never and will never be a winner. Your compromised ad hires a circus act to be the head coach, year 3 is a disaster and your recruiting is ok for a sunbelt team but likely to sink like a stone now. Yet as even the blind can see, daddy's little spastic boy is drowning. He has no idea how to fix things, he doesn't even understand what needs to be fixed but the"let's give him at least 5 years" crowd is oblivious. LOOK at what you are seeing. In two more years that spastic cheerleader will have your program completely destroyed. You better stop the bleeding now.
You hope so!
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
It was embarrassing. We can't sugar coat it. We blew a 10-point lead with like 4 and 1/2 minutes left because we couldn't get a single first down
Or the other version, the defense couldn't stop FL on 4th and long, several times! Offense put enough points on the board to win - defensive failure!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoelKL65

Beanerball

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2023
696
515
93
Orange Dog, I’m talking basic economics. We need money in our pockets to go get a top notch coach. These men are not stupid , they know their value. We don’t have that kind of money. Yes, we could start over and would be right back here. We should have gotten better coaches instead of hiring Muschamp and Beamer. To me, the best way forward, no more raises for a head coach too early, unless he’s got you playing for a conference title. Build up cash and aim higher. Don’t make the same mistake over and over, that’s called insanity. Our first course of action has to be dealing with Tanner. I loved what he did for the baseball program, but we need a CEO, not an old coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Orange Dog

cocean

Member
Feb 1, 2022
160
81
28
Hate to tell ya, u see a difference year 1 with a good coach, each yr after they build on it..prolly not the one
 

cockyferg

Active member
Jan 25, 2022
330
338
63
Or the other version, the defense couldn't stop FL on 4th and long, several times! Offense put enough points on the board to win - defensive failure!
Agreed. I think both are true. Although we scored 39 points, which should be good enough to win any game
 

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,154
1,589
113
Orange Dog, I’m talking basic economics. We need money in our pockets to go get a top notch coach. These men are not stupid , they know their value. We don’t have that kind of money. Yes, we could start over and would be right back here. We should have gotten better coaches instead of hiring Muschamp and Beamer. To me, the best way forward, no more raises for a head coach too early, unless he’s got you playing for a conference title. Build up cash and aim higher. Don’t make the same mistake over and over, that’s called insanity. Our first course of action has to be dealing with Tanner. I loved what he did for the baseball program, but we need a CEO, not an old coach.
You missed the most important point he made, we need to hire a real AD... an executive professional type, not an ex baseball coach from within.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Orange Dog

Cynical Cock

New member
Oct 15, 2023
1
0
0
Let's face one basic uncomfortable fact:

Georgia is not going anywhere any time soon. Kirby Smart has built a monster that is going to dominate the SEC East for a very long time.

We do not have anywhere near the money to compete against UGA.

I think our best expectation is bowl eligibility from here on out.
 

The Orange Dog

Well-known member
Aug 2, 2022
1,929
3,605
113
Orange Dog, I’m talking basic economics. We need money in our pockets to go get a top notch coach. These men are not stupid , they know their value. We don’t have that kind of money. Yes, we could start over and would be right back here. We should have gotten better coaches instead of hiring Muschamp and Beamer. To me, the best way forward, no more raises for a head coach too early, unless he’s got you playing for a conference title. Build up cash and aim higher. Don’t make the same mistake over and over, that’s called insanity. Our first course of action has to be dealing with Tanner. I loved what he did for the baseball program, but we need a CEO, not an old coach.
Great post. With the economics of today's CFB, it is just going to get more difficult and the divide between the "haves" and "Have nots" is only going to grow. I one thousand percent agree with you regarding the AD position. We went through two decades of one inept AD after another until our governor got the right university president, chancellor and BOT in place. Then they hired a great AD, all got on the same page and we are finally exiting our nuclear winter. The danger I see you guys in is that Beamer and company are not successful but you all stick with him another couple of years. Based on the staff's accomplishments up to now, you all will be in a much worse position in a couple more years, making attracting a solid HBC even more difficult. While, due to past bad hires you can't afford to fire Beamer, can you honestly afford not to?
 

Guy in the Back

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
437
498
93
No need to run Beamer off. Not sure if he told Satt to look elsewhere or if Rhule just took him, but Loggains is a far better OC than Satt was (not that it would take a lot).

I thought White was good year 1. His defense has regressed every year. I get they lost some quality folks, so you’d expect a little drop off. However we have a really bad combination of not being able to create pressure nor cover. Three years in and tackling has regressed significantly from year 1. I think if Beamer is committed to getting better, White is gone at the end of the year. Like someone else said, trash Dabo all you want, but I’d bet he’d let White go.
 

cobracock

Joined Nov 22, 2009
Feb 1, 2022
28
13
8
Beamer can win 4 games this year, and he's not going anywhere still.

Not qualifying for a bowl next year would be the earliest he's in question, imho.
My two cents. What attracts recruits to us? Football history? The city? The stadium? Our record against Clemson? The fans? Previous coaches? The future? Record against regional rivals? The Mascot? Being called The Cocks? Bowl history (no wins until 1995)? Academics? Presidential history. Recruiting success? Perception of the school? What, for you, as a recruit, would be the most important? Let's call it a Report Card. Any thoughts out there? To me, honestly, the future looks very bleak, as it has always been. Pay an outrageous amount of $$$$$s to get the Best Coach in the country. In the long run, it will be cheaper and guarantee wins. Everything else we've tried has been a bust!! Reality strikes us Gamecocks!!
 

Jaykid28

Member
Jan 24, 2022
78
59
18
A lot of you all need to slow your roll. its going to take time, we are in the SEC. Beamer can get it done but give the man time. And no, that does not mean i am or we are settling for mediocrity. it is just the reality of our situation. Either get off the wagon or get behind the program.. It took Spurrier some years (and yes i know he is a legend). SO it will take Beamer more time than Spurrier. And to all you arm chair QBs and trolls, we realize you all have all the answers. Get into the coaching profession, we really could use your insight and solutions.
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
No signs of things improving. What makes you think he can do it
He replaced the OC and the O is better. Recruiting is still going strong. Truthfully nobody knows. I just try to pay attention to how he addresses issues at this point, rather than W/Ls before year 4. He took over a program riddled with issues. Overall he’s done a nice job addressing them. If he keeps that up the wins will follow.

Honestly it’s a lot like that Kirby halftime speech against us this year. Don’t be results oriented. Be process oriented. Focus on small individual wins. I still feel like he’s on track there. But he has to solve the D problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Machammy

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,555
3,072
113
A lot of you all need to slow your roll. its going to take time, we are in the SEC. Beamer can get it done but give the man time. And no, that does not mean i am or we are settling for mediocrity. it is just the reality of our situation. Either get off the wagon or get behind the program.. It took Spurrier some years (and yes i know he is a legend). SO it will take Beamer more time than Spurrier. And to all you arm chair QBs and trolls, we realize you all have all the answers. Get into the coaching profession, we really could use your insight and solutions.

I remember this exact post written about Muschamp too.
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
Orange Dog, I’m talking basic economics. We need money in our pockets to go get a top notch coach. These men are not stupid , they know their value. We don’t have that kind of money. Yes, we could start over and would be right back here. We should have gotten better coaches instead of hiring Muschamp and Beamer. To me, the best way forward, no more raises for a head coach too early, unless he’s got you playing for a conference title. Build up cash and aim higher. Don’t make the same mistake over and over, that’s called insanity. Our first course of action has to be dealing with Tanner. I loved what he did for the baseball program, but we need a CEO, not an old coach.
You are hung up on this money deal for no reason. We didn’t hire Beamer bc we’re broke, or couldn’t afford better, or still paying Muschamp (we’re not by the way). We hired him bc that’s who RT wanted who was also interested in us.
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
He replaced the OC and the O is better. Recruiting is still going strong. Truthfully nobody knows. I just try to pay attention to how he addresses issues at this point, rather than W/Ls before year 4. He took over a program riddled with issues. Overall he’s done a nice job addressing them. If he keeps that up the wins will follow.

Honestly it’s a lot like that Kirby halftime speech against us this year. Don’t be results oriented. Be process oriented. Focus on small individual wins. I still feel like he’s on track there. But he has to solve the D problem.
I agree on individual wins - I don't see our guys playing like they want to beat the man across from them.
And that's how you win ball games - a group of individuals playing as a team to win their own individual battle.
I don't see it on the OLine or in the back seven on defense in particular!
 

bayrooster

Well-known member
Jan 21, 2022
2,154
1,589
113
A lot of you all need to slow your roll. its going to take time, we are in the SEC. Beamer can get it done but give the man time. And no, that does not mean i am or we are settling for mediocrity. it is just the reality of our situation. Either get off the wagon or get behind the program.. It took Spurrier some years (and yes i know he is a legend). SO it will take Beamer more time than Spurrier. And to all you arm chair QBs and trolls, we realize you all have all the answers. Get into the coaching profession, we really could use your insight and solutions.
THIS logic is why we suck at hiring coaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Orange Dog

ThinnyJ

Member
Sep 16, 2023
178
142
43
The disappointing thing is that the team doesn't look to be any better than it was when Beamer arrived. Most coaches have a big year 2 bump and things continue getting better in year 3. Honestly, the wins over UT and clemson last year were mostly due to both teams taking us very lightly more than our suddenly having the light come on.

The problem is; if you do fire Beamer, who do you get to replace him? What quality coach is going to take a job where the last coach was fired after 3 seasons?
We didn't score over 60 on tennessee because they took us lightly. You're looking for a reason to not appreciate how well we played
 

Jonesz2

Joined Aug 9, 2005
Jan 21, 2022
1,362
1,982
113
He replaced the OC and the O is better. Recruiting is still going strong. Truthfully nobody knows. I just try to pay attention to how he addresses issues at this point, rather than W/Ls before year 4. He took over a program riddled with issues. Overall he’s done a nice job addressing them. If he keeps that up the wins will follow.

Honestly it’s a lot like that Kirby halftime speech against us this year. Don’t be results oriented. Be process oriented. Focus on small individual wins. I still feel like he’s on track there. But he has to solve the D problem.
I hope you right. I’m just worried 3 yrs from now we will be saying the same things just like with Muschamp
 

Mic4usc

Joined Oct 16, 2015
Jan 22, 2022
641
847
93
We’re not really that young. Wanna see a young team? We lost to them yesterday at home, and they currently have a top 5 recruiting class lining up. We have the worst AD in the league, if not the country, who hired a guy for on the job training in the SEC. Someway, somehow he pulled 2 wins last year out of his *** and Tanner fell over himself throwing money at him despite seeing likely NFL talent leave via the portal.
UF is close to where we were last year. They play young guys but it’s mixed with a handful of veteran leftovers who play hard.

Beamer fixed the OC issue. He was always going to be a coach who needed great coaches around him. Right now, that’s lacking on defense.
 

Jaykid28

Member
Jan 24, 2022
78
59
18
again, you armchair saints need to get up and start coaching, you all have such brilliant football minds.
 

Big JC

Well-known member
May 12, 2023
1,240
905
113
We didn't score over 60 on tennessee because they took us lightly. You're looking for a reason to not appreciate how well we played
I guess I can't live off of two big wins that ultimately didn't mean anything for as long as some people can. Tennessee had a horrid defense last season. Yes, we played well on offense in that game but it wasn't like we were facing a steel curtain defense either.
 

Big JC

Well-known member
May 12, 2023
1,240
905
113
UF is close to where we were last year. They play young guys but it’s mixed with a handful of veteran leftovers who play hard.

Beamer fixed the OC issue. He was always going to be a coach who needed great coaches around him. Right now, that’s lacking on defense.
Sadly, Beamer is pretty much Dabo without Dabo's talent and a tougher schedule. He is an emotional cheerleader front man type of coach who has to have top level coaches around him to win at any level considered "successful". Unfortunately, Carolina is not a program that top level coordinators see as a great stepping stone in their careers. We don't have the tradition, the talent, the recruiting draw, the facilities or the deep pockets to lure top assistants to Columbia.

The same handicaps apply to hiring a head coach. The Carolina job is not a coveted job by established head coaches in any way. It is similar to the Mississippi State job. The best option would be to hire a young G5 coach who is up and coming and let him use Carolina as a stepping stone to one of the "big" program jobs. Chadwell could have been that coach in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,154
12,146
113
Beamer is definitely not on the hot seat.

He is, however, at the point of needed to sacrifice a few assistants in order to placate the fans and hopefully keep himself off the hot seat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boduke

Mic4usc

Joined Oct 16, 2015
Jan 22, 2022
641
847
93
Sadly, Beamer is pretty much Dabo without Dabo's talent and a tougher schedule. He is an emotional cheerleader front man type of coach who has to have top level coaches around him to win at any level considered "successful". Unfortunately, Carolina is not a program that top level coordinators see as a great stepping stone in their careers. We don't have the tradition, the talent, the recruiting draw, the facilities or the deep pockets to lure top assistants to Columbia.

The same handicaps apply to hiring a head coach. The Carolina job is not a coveted job by established head coaches in any way. It is similar to the Mississippi State job. The best option would be to hire a young G5 coach who is up and coming and let him use Carolina as a stepping stone to one of the "big" program jobs. Chadwell could have been that coach in my opinion.
I was nervous about Beamer, but I think he understands how to be successful. I think any coach here is going to have to weather early storms in order to gain stability. Beamer did that in year 1-2. Even the media knows not to count him out. I think Beamer can get the right staff together but similar to Spurrier, it might take a few years. Hopefully we can be good enough in the meantime to keep hope. Bc hope is the lifeblood.