Reminds me of Austin Scott.
Reminds me of Austin Scott.
seems like a formula and old guy with thick glasses used to preachThe potential for '27 class is through the roof. PA, in general, is as loaded of a prospect list that I can remember in recent memory - let alone our other regional traditional areas.
The reality is can we keep these guys committed? And can we secure Hiller, Gregory, Robinson, Bonner, Smith, Kalis? This class has the potential to be top 5-ish - and I know we say that every year, lol. But it seems like Franklin has been able to secure one of these stacked classes every 3-4 years or so that we build around these "championship-potential" core classes.
A lot comes off the books at the end of this season - does the staff push chips in on the potential of the '27 class?
Wash your mouth out with soap. Scott went to my local HS and he was all world. Senior YEAR 3,853 yards , 53 TDs and most of the second halfs were played with a running clock. He should have been a first round draft choice, but he was a true knucklehead. Case in point, freshman year he was being tutored by Sue Paterno. Scott blew her off and immediately went to the infamous JoePa dog house. He would occasionally emerge, only to take up "residency" again until Joe eventually threw him off the team.Reminds me of Austin Scott.
College Football Week Zero Shocker!More like Journey Brown in terms of the numbers he's putting up imho.
He's taking visits. I would hardly call him committed at this point. Seider going after him hard at ND.Would appreciate opinion from BWI on Spell's decommitting or not.
Yes. The same peeps that have criticized Franklin for it probably thought Joe was a genius when he did it.seems like a formula and old guy with thick glasses used to preach
yep- nothing but red flags here- move onA long way to go on this one, however, Landon’s correct IMO. If a kid comes out with a list of schools who have the best chance of flipping him, he may as well de-commit.
Correct and the bigger year he has the bigger the NIL price tag is going to be...just driving up his pricetag.
just driving up his pricetag.
Extremely rational post.It's professional sports. 90-95% of free agents sign for the most money. This kid isn't the problem. If PSU offers the most money, he'll end up here. Lots of time between now and December 2026.
It's professional sports. 90-95% of free agents sign for the most money. This kid isn't the problem. If PSU offers the most money, he'll end up here. Lots of time between now and December 2026.
He gone.He’s taking some visits this fall. Let’s hope he sticks.
Absolutely idiotic post. Franklin would never have signed Parsons with this type of attitude. The kid is a high school junior who is being inundated with attention.yep- nothing but red flags here- move on
Like Parsons Nostradamus? Love the grammar too.He gone.
Completely different environment. Schools couldn't get into a bidding for Parsons.Like Parsons Nostradamus? Love the grammar too.
Here's the answer:Completely different environment. Schools couldn't get into a bidding for Parsons.
It's professional sports. 90-95% of free agents sign for the most money. This kid isn't the problem. If PSU offers the most money, he'll end up here. Lots of time between now and December 2026.
That and the fact Ohio State was forced to back off, in order to avoid punishment for recruiting violations.Completely different environment. Schools couldn't get into a bidding for Parsons.
No doubt. Same ones have been calling for a change for years now....but he keeps winning so they keep pushing the line farther. MNC Or bust...fire the HC. LOL, damn expectations.Yes. The same peeps that have criticized Franklin for it probably thought Joe was a genius when he did it.
you seem upset, maybe take a deep breathAbsolutely idiotic post. Franklin would never have signed Parsons with this type of attitude. The kid is a high school junior who is being inundated with attention.
just driving up his pricetag.
How would you propose to stop it?Agree with this - today's environment incents recruits to create a "bidding war" situation. The only thing their "commitment" does is create a platform from which to conduct their auction with a clear "reserve" protecting them. Given today's realities, recruits should not be able to use Program's "Commitments" (i.e., resource commitments) in this way and effectively shop offers with zero negative consequences.
How about NIL penalties to the player being recruited example you commit to one place via verbally, social medially, however its done--- but end up somewhere else--- a portion of your actual NIL you receive from the school you sign with lets say 20% goes to the school you decommitted from.....maybe great in theory.. easy to track... probably hard to enforce as in who does the enforcing?How would you propose to stop it?
Seems like a pretty heavy administrative burden for the sake of appeasing the message board community. Might be better to have a binding early signing period.How about NIL penalties to the player being recruited example you commit to one place via verbally, social medially, however its done--- but end up somewhere else--- a portion of your actual NIL you receive from the school you sign with lets say 20% goes to the school you decommitted from.....maybe great in theory.. easy to track... probably hard to enforce as in who does the enforcing?
this would instantly stop any early commitments used as leverage by the player and in some cases by the university as well (poaching)
Seems like a pretty heavy administrative burden for the sake of appeasing the message board community. Might be better to have a binding early signing period.
How would you propose to stop it?
so what I said cant be a binding contract? words put out in the either should still have meaning the absence of the binding contract nullifies what they say till they sign the contract ... the ole "put up or shutup" as it were for the player--- meaning put the nil fines in the contract but enforcing everyone to sign one would seem the biggest hurdleSeems like a pretty heavy administrative burden for the sake of appeasing the message board community. Might be better to have a binding early signing period.