LeBron is now the NBA’s all-time leading scorer…

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,106
9,452
113
Right, I was just mentioning one from another sport who is the top 2 all time and hated by many. Tiger isnt at the level of LeBron though.

From 96-12, the hate for Tiger was real. It was strong and very real. Straight up racism fueled a lot of it, and his personality didnt help with the rest that disliked him.
He fell from grace in a hard way and wow people loved it. They couldnt get enough.
...but America loves a comeback, and Tiger came back in a big way, so much has been forgotten/forgiven. He is also no longer seen as a threat so the hate for him has simmered significantly.
Any tournament he played in had massive crowds (who happen to be 95% white) and had huge TV ratings. I mean I get it, there’s haters who were racist and that’s never going to change but there were plenty of people who didn’t care for him for different reasons. I never was a big Tiger fan mostly because he was the top dog and when you watched a tournament on tv it was constant coverage of him and no one else. That’s no fault of his but you begin to dislike someone when they’re rammed down your throat constantly.

I only pulled for him in the Ryder or Presidents Cups. I did the same for Lebron and Kobe in the Olympics.
 

MSUDAWGFAN

Active member
Apr 17, 2014
884
319
63
And Jokic should be on there. The guy does it all and is an elite disturber of the ball….who plays the 5.
I never said he shouldn't be. He is a great player for sure, but he hasn't been in the league long enough to be considered better than Russell. Yet, anyway.
 

DerHntr

Well-known member
Sep 18, 2007
15,239
1,170
113
I made the comparison because someone else mentioned there probably isnt someone else who is top 2 in their sport who is as hated as LeBron.
I thought about that, agreed, and added to the comment by mentioning who I thought would even be in consideration, though they arent as hated as LeBron.

Thats why I made the comparison- because the opportunity to discuss and compare to people in other sports was brought up.
You 17ing suck at conversation.

As for Tiger not being hated, it was established years ago that you live in a world unlike most everyone else. How you managed to ignore/not see the hate for him is really not surprising. He was the greatest active player and more dominant than any other athlete in their sport at the time(even the tennis guys). That alone gets you on the hated list of many since fans often just gravitate to hating the dominant player/team.
He was hated for his personality. He was hated for his lack of personality. He was hated for his outspoken dad. He was hated for the narrative created around his upbringing. He was hated for his race. He was hated for his other race. He was hated for cheating on his wife. He was hated for presenting himself as someone totally different than reality. He was hated for his military obsession.

The primary reason so many are replying to you about Tiger is because your first post was very much on brand for you. You said “… the hate for Tiger was real. It was strong and very real. Straight up racism fueled a lot of it, and his personality didn't help with the rest that disliked him.” Of course you listed race first and then his personality second somewhat as an after thought. Stir pot. Wait for people to reply. Then show your supposed broad level of understanding by listing all the ways Tiger could be hated and put race much further down your list. It’s so obvious you didn’t mean there weren’t other reasons and how could anyone construe it as you being focused on the boogeyman.**

I agree race played a factor but saying it fueled much of the hate is laughable. Now I expect you to reply with “I didn’t say ‘much of the hate’, I said a lot of the hate.” Then you’ll go on to split hairs with words we won’t read.
 

MSUDAWGFAN

Active member
Apr 17, 2014
884
319
63
The primary reason so many are replying to you about Tiger is because your first post was very much on brand for you. You said “… the hate for Tiger was real. It was strong and very real. Straight up racism fueled a lot of it, and his personality didn't help with the rest that disliked him.” Of course you listed race first and then his personality second somewhat as an after thought. Stir pot. Wait for people to reply. Then show your supposed broad level of understanding by listing all the ways Tiger could be hated and put race much further down your list. It’s so obvious you didn’t mean there weren’t other reasons and how could anyone construe it as you being focused on the boogeyman.**

I agree race played a factor but saying it fueled much of the hate is laughable. Now I expect you to reply with “I didn’t say ‘much of the hate’, I said a lot of the hate.” Then you’ll go on to split hairs with words we won’t read.
He also said I said I hated Lebron and I never did. I just said he wasn't in my Mt. Rushmore of Lakers.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
Did I say I hated Lebron? If so, I aplogize because I never meant to. Please point me to where I said that so I can take it back. I'd like to edit that out.

Also - about Horry - yeah he was a really good role player, but he was never the team leader. Had he been the team leader and won all those titles, sure I'd put him in the discussion .But since he wasn't, he doesn't belong.
You did not say you hate LeBron. What you did, was reply to a post of mine which was me discussing how I find a lot of the LeBron hate to be absurd and inconsistent.
You started that post with 'for me it isnt about his off the court stuff...' which I took to mean you did hate him, but not for the off the court stuff. I genuinely dont know why you started that post the way you did if you didnt intend to tie it to the comments I had made(which you quoted) about LeBron being hated.

I was joking about Horry and just being absurd with what I read was you tying titles to greatness.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
I simply said he was able to accumulate the most total points while scoring 10% fewer points per game. Never said he didn’t score the most points. You then wrote a book.

You did simply say that. I simply took that to mean you were trying to discount the accomplishment. I then simply disagreed and simply wrote a book about that disagreement. If you werent trying to discount the accomplishment, my bad. I dont know why else you would have genuinely posted that comment, but my bad on the incorrect guess.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
Any tournament he played in had massive crowds (who happen to be 95% white) and had huge TV ratings. I mean I get it, there’s haters who were racist and that’s never going to change but there were plenty of people who didn’t care for him for different reasons. I never was a big Tiger fan mostly because he was the top dog and when you watched a tournament on tv it was constant coverage of him and no one else. That’s no fault of his but you begin to dislike someone when they’re rammed down your throat constantly.

I only pulled for him in the Ryder or Presidents Cups. I did the same for Lebron and Kobe in the Olympics.
Very well said- "...you begin to dislike someone when they’re rammed down your throat constantly."
Yes I agree that was a big part of the overall hate.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
The primary reason so many are replying to you about Tiger is because your first post was very much on brand for you. You said “… the hate for Tiger was real. It was strong and very real. Straight up racism fueled a lot of it, and his personality didn't help with the rest that disliked him.” Of course you listed race first and then his personality second somewhat as an after thought. Stir pot. Wait for people to reply. Then show your supposed broad level of understanding by listing all the ways Tiger could be hated and put race much further down your list. It’s so obvious you didn’t mean there weren’t other reasons and how could anyone construe it as you being focused on the boogeyman.**

I agree race played a factor but saying it fueled much of the hate is laughable. Now I expect you to reply with “I didn’t say ‘much of the hate’, I said a lot of the hate.” Then you’ll go on to split hairs with words we won’t read.
Yeah I will agree with this. I shouldnt have said racism fueled a lot of it. It fueled more than a little, but sure I agree it wasnt a lot of it.
When I posted that I was thinking about the 90s mostly, when yeah its well damn documented that he was met with a ton of resistance because he didnt look like others. Begay at Stanford has talked about this at length even. After 99ish though, it was probably a healthy bit of what DCD mentioned- people largely hated him because they were sick of him being rammed down their throats thru media coverage.

As for me stirring the pot and waiting for people to reply, that was not my intent and really is never my intent. I was giving a high level recap of over 15 years of coverage of the guy and should have balanced my comments more accurately. My apologies.
You mentioned I put race much further down on a subsequent list. I assume you mean the post where I list reasons why I have read or heard people hate on Tiger. That was in no particular order and I posted the race comments where they are because I thought about them after mentioning his dad. Its not because I wanted to slyly devalue them, or whatever nefarious thing you think I am up to here.
 

MSUDAWGFAN

Active member
Apr 17, 2014
884
319
63
You did not say you hate LeBron. What you did, was reply to a post of mine which was me discussing how I find a lot of the LeBron hate to be absurd and inconsistent.
You started that post with 'for me it isnt about his off the court stuff...' which I took to mean you did hate him, but not for the off the court stuff. I genuinely dont know why you started that post the way you did if you didnt intend to tie it to the comments I had made(which you quoted) about LeBron being hated.

I was joking about Horry and just being absurd with what I read was you tying titles to greatness.
Understood.

Some people think I hate on him because I don't list him as 1st or 2nd greatest player ever. That simply isn't true. I just think there are several players that were better. That doesn't equate to "hate" in my book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,084
113

To argue with Herrington, I think a point could be made that there were other players that were as great when Jordan played as those Lebron has faced, but Jordan just beat them every time, so they aren’t considered dominant. Had Lebron beaten curry in the finals every time, would Curry be considered dominant? Those Jazz and Knicks teams that Jordan beat were loaded with amazing players that could’ve been considered dominant if not for Jordan.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,106
9,452
113
Understood.

Some people think I hate on him because I don't list him as 1st or 2nd greatest player ever. That simply isn't true. I just think there are several players that were better. That doesn't equate to "hate" in my book.
He’s in the top five greatest players ever. I can’t stand the guy at all but that’s where he is.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,106
9,452
113
To argue with Herrington, I think a point could be made that there were other players that were as great when Jordan played as those Lebron has faced, but Jordan just beat them every time, so they aren’t considered dominant. Had Lebron beaten curry in the finals every time, would Curry be considered dominant? Those Jazz and Knicks teams that Jordan beat were loaded with amazing players that could’ve been considered dominant if not for Jordan.
Yes I disagree with him on the same point you make. Those Jazz teams were unreal. For the most part he had a cakewalk in the East other than the Knicks and occasionally the Pacers. The rest of the east was garbage most years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

paindonthurt

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2009
9,529
2,045
113
I Guess If You Say So GIF
I know. Lebron is cringe, right? Glad we agree.
 

dorndawg

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2012
7,008
5,114
113
I know. Lebron is cringe, right? Glad we agree.
I don't know about cringe (I know the kids say it a lot these days so tbh not sure exactly what it means any more,) but I don't find him especially interesting.
 

eckie1

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2007
3,248
2,388
113
Kareem was well past his prime by those days and played a different position. He held the scoring record for almost 40 years, Bird is 36th. Magic was a great player, but you're right not as great as Bird.
Kinda makes you wonder if the KANG is a bit more, say…. SELFISH…. than the all-time greats?
 

theoriginalSALTYdog

Well-known member
Jul 10, 2021
897
1,103
93
He isn't on my Lakers Mt. Rushmore.

Who would you take him above from the following:
Kareem
Magic
Kobe
Wilt
Shaq

I wouldn't take him over any of those guys.

That's 5, which is more than Mt. Rushmore so even if you want to say he is better than one, there is leeway to keep him off.

He also broke the all time scoring record when the rules were changed to favor offensive players. Keep in mind, in the 80's, this was just a regular foul:


If they still called "carrying" or "palming" the ball LJ's average ppg would be half of what it is now.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
If they still called "carrying" or "palming" the ball LJ's average ppg would be half of what it is now.
Everyone's avg would be impacted.
If teams rebounded 50+ years ago the way they do now, guys wouldnt have averaged 20+ rebounds a game back then.

Again, there are differences in how the game is played between eras.
 

theoriginalSALTYdog

Well-known member
Jul 10, 2021
897
1,103
93
Everyone's avg would be impacted.
If teams rebounded 50+ years ago the way they do now, guys wouldnt have averaged 20+ rebounds a game back then.

Again, there are differences in how the game is played between eras.
Yeah, they don't enforce the rules now.
 

goindhoo

Active member
Feb 29, 2008
1,089
189
63
You constantly act like the rest of us ignore that these issues weren't around when Tiger first started becoming a significant golf player. Yes, these were issues real issues that needed to be fixed but they're not the only reason why people didn't like Tiger. We all heard the comments from Lee Trevino about fried chicken and watermelon and said it was offensive. Why is it if that we're not continuously talking first about how racism is a part of every issue we discuss that it was that we are supposedly ignoring it?

Do you realize the time itself has proved to everyone that Lee Trevino was an ******* who became irrelevant when compared to Tiger's talent and historical importance as a golfer?
Dont drag Lee Trevino. It was fuzzy zoeller that made those comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

goindhoo

Active member
Feb 29, 2008
1,089
189
63
As for Tiger not being hated, it was established years ago that you live in a world unlike most everyone else. How you managed to ignore/not see the hate for him is really not surprising. He was the greatest active player and more dominant than any other athlete in their sport at the time(even the tennis guys). That alone gets you on the hated list of many since fans often just gravitate to hating the dominant player/team.
He was hated for his personality. He was hated for his lack of personality. He was hated for his outspoken dad. He was hated for the narrative created around his upbringing. He was hated for his race. He was hated for his other race. He was hated for cheating on his wife. He was hated for presenting himself as someone totally different than reality. He was hated for his military obsession.
Some of this is really reaching. Hated for military obsession? I think the military training hurt his body and career but who can hate him for it. Narrative around upbrining? I guess this is more race hate because black/asian kids shouldnt be playing golf. Hated because of his dad? Most people dont even know anything about his dad who died almost 20 years ago.

For someone that is and was so hated, he sure does move the needle.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
Some of this is really reaching. Hated for military obsession? I think the military training hurt his body and career but who can hate him for it. Narrative around upbrining? I guess this is more race hate because black/asian kids shouldnt be playing golf. Hated because of his dad? Most people dont even know anything about his dad who died almost 20 years ago.

For someone that is and was so hated, he sure does move the needle.
Yeah, he was heavily criticized in articles, by active military who viewed his getting to join in on training as an insult. Thats him being hated.
His upbringing, the way he was pushed and also his celebrity as a teen, has been heavily criticized thru the years. Thats him being hated for those things.
Earl was a lightning rod for controversy and parental criticism. Tiger was criticized for the perception that he was favored over siblings. Tiger has been tied to comments that Earl made, which were criticized. Tiger was expected to justify things Earl said and Tiger defended him, to the point of also being criticized. That is him being hated. As for his dad dying a long time ago...I am clearly referring to before he died. Tiger has been a pro for over a quarter century and was a household name in golf for a handful of years before that. Earl was around for Tiger's first decade as a pro and it was a dominant decade- one that had Tiger on magazine covers all the time, winning constantly, and a focus for fans both on and off the course. Just because Earl has been dead for 16 years doesnt change what happened in the decade prior.
 

goindhoo

Active member
Feb 29, 2008
1,089
189
63
Yeah, he was heavily criticized in articles, by active military who viewed his getting to join in on training as an insult. Thats him being hated.
His upbringing, the way he was pushed and also his celebrity as a teen, has been heavily criticized thru the years. Thats him being hated for those things.
Earl was a lightning rod for controversy and parental criticism. Tiger was criticized for the perception that he was favored over siblings. Tiger has been tied to comments that Earl made, which were criticized. Tiger was expected to justify things Earl said and Tiger defended him, to the point of also being criticized. That is him being hated. As for his dad dying a long time ago...I am clearly referring to before he died. Tiger has been a pro for over a quarter century and was a household name in golf for a handful of years before that. Earl was around for Tiger's first decade as a pro and it was a dominant decade- one that had Tiger on magazine covers all the time, winning constantly, and a focus for fans both on and off the course. Just because Earl has been dead for 16 years doesnt change what happened in the decade prior.
You are referencing things that very few people are even aware of regarding Tiger. Most golf fans probably dont even know. I doubt there are many people that hate him for any of these things.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,106
9,452
113
Yeah, he was heavily criticized in articles, by active military who viewed his getting to join in on training as an insult. Thats him being hated.
His upbringing, the way he was pushed and also his celebrity as a teen, has been heavily criticized thru the years. Thats him being hated for those things.
Earl was a lightning rod for controversy and parental criticism. Tiger was criticized for the perception that he was favored over siblings. Tiger has been tied to comments that Earl made, which were criticized. Tiger was expected to justify things Earl said and Tiger defended him, to the point of also being criticized. That is him being hated. As for his dad dying a long time ago...I am clearly referring to before he died. Tiger has been a pro for over a quarter century and was a household name in golf for a handful of years before that. Earl was around for Tiger's first decade as a pro and it was a dominant decade- one that had Tiger on magazine covers all the time, winning constantly, and a focus for fans both on and off the course. Just because Earl has been dead for 16 years doesnt change what happened in the decade prior.
That’s honest to God the first time I’ve ever heard that and I follow golf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login