MUW changing name to....

Shmuley

Well-known member
Mar 6, 2008
22,288
5,180
113
Mississippi Brightwell University, pending Legislative approval


"Mississippi State-Columbus" is the most obvious choice, imo
Legislature to MUW President: "Thank you for your suggestion. Can we speak to your husband?"
 

Dawgg

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2012
7,555
6,130
113
Legislature to MUW President: "Thank you for your suggestion. Can we speak to your husband?"

ETA: Bleh, I thought it embedded. Not worth clicking on. It's a clip from 30 Rock where Chet Huntley and David Brinkley tell a female reporter something like "Doll, you got a nice shape on you, but I'm gonna need you to go find a man to tell us what's happening there. Is a policeman or your father nearby?"

 
Last edited:

Tractorman

Active member
Mar 15, 2009
729
253
63
they are getting smoked in the comments by alumni on their facebook announcement
 

DoggieDaddy13

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2017
2,746
1,053
113
This is the result of some Presidentially-appointed-squirrellya$$ed committee that fell victim to some seriously 17d up GroupThink. Hilarious!

MUW, STATE, MVSU, The Corn and the good folks in Stoneville should all be part of the Mississippi State University system, focusing on Ag and Mechanics, Engineering, Computing and Tech. Just one set of athletic teams.

DSU, OM, the Med Center, and USM should all be under JSU and call them all the U of M, U of M-Oxford, U of M-Hattiesburg, and U of M-Cleveland. Again, just one set of athletic teams.

Repurpose the Vaught and build a new stadium in Jackson for Lane's Landsharks -- or maybe they could get primetime back. They'll be playing for the National Championship every year by then -- imagine their NIL money.

Maybe we survive in the SEC or join some other conference or move down to division 2.

The IHL goes from 8 universities to 2. that would save a ton of dollars and improve the product, the output, and probably the state considerably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

willi13

Member
Sep 24, 2003
666
247
43
Mississippi Brightwell University, pending Legislative approval


"Mississippi State-Columbus" is the most obvious choice, imo
They should first open a satellite campus in Kosciusko. Then name it Female University of Columbus and Kosciusko.
 
Jul 10, 2009
521
79
28
My then girlfriend (now wife) attended the W. She shook her head upon hearing of the name change bomb.

Speaking of bombs...

When I took speech under the late Dr. Hank Flick, I told a cringey W joke during my introductory speech. To regurgitate...

"My girlfriend is at MUW, and she is on a minority scholarship. She is hetereosexual AND non-obese."

It landed just as flat then, as it does now...

 
Last edited:

Maroon13

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,753
1,758
113
Btw. From a guy that knows, the university approached the Welty family years ago to ask permission to use their name for naming the school. The Welty family said no, as they did not feel it was right since Eudora Welty transferred after one year and didn't graduate there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

theoriginalSALTYdog

Well-known member
Jul 10, 2021
897
1,103
93
My then girlfriend (now wife) attended the W. She shook her head upon hearing of the name change bomb.

Speaking of bombs...

When I took speech under the late Dr. Hank Flick, I told a cringey W joke during my introductory speech. To regurgitate...

"My girlfriend is at MUW, and she is on a minority scholarship. She is hetereosexual AND non-obese."

It landed just as flat then, as it does now...


Certainly no offense GfG......Good story too....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guy From Gulfport

aTotal360

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2009
18,726
7,491
113
My wife is a Dubya alum. She said they sent out surveys with potential names on them. Brightwell wasn't on it. So all of her college buddies are like WTF.

At some point, she was told the Eudora Welty estate was approached for naming rights because of internal pressure. They declined it. Supposedly EW hated her time at the W and didn't like the university.
 

HammerOfTheDogs

Well-known member
Aug 6, 2004
10,332
1,002
113
And whatever happened to tradition, could have at least gone back to its original name!****

“Mississippi University for Women, originally the Mississippi Industrial Institute and College for the Education of White Girls, was the first taxpayer supported college for women in the United States.”
MIICEWG?
 

Dawgpile

Well-known member
May 23, 2006
2,110
624
113
Mississippi Brightwell University, pending Legislative approval


"Mississippi State-Columbus" is the most obvious choice, imo
Told my dad and he said "Brightwell sounds like a laundry detergent".
 

Called3rdstrikedawg

Well-known member
May 7, 2016
732
704
93
It’d have to be part of a plan to scale them down and reduce fixed costs. Sucks but at the end of the day, you’re going to have some relatively expensive buildings without a real purpose. Maybe in Cleveland you could recoup some costs by leasing out dirt cheap office space. MSVSU could maybe ultimately be made the new campus of Mississippi delta community college and just abandon the Moorhead campus?
Actually, Valley is essentially a 4 year JUCO.

I was eating in a restaurant in Greenwood a few years ago and 3 professors who teach Junior/Senior level classes were discussing their class sizes. None of them had more than 5 students in their classes. None of the 3 were from Mississippi and were all 1st year professors. They were shocked at how few upperclassmen were enrolled in a School where scholarship was almost 90% government funded at the time. Essentially Free tuition and still hundreds dropped out after 2 years.
I'm sure it is better now though.😳
 

lanceharbor7

Member
Feb 24, 2008
885
10
18
How many woman, man, They/Them hours were wasted on this endeavor? The idiotic conversations leading to this decision could probably be a good SNL skit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WilCoDawg

MagicDawg

Well-known member
Nov 11, 2010
795
514
93
"Mississippi Brightwell"
- a Damon Runyon character cut from Guys & Dolls during early out-of-town tryouts
- a seedy pool hustler from the outskirts of Yazoo City
- a professional (lady?) wrestler active in the 40s
- the man Prissy eventually married after Rhett left Scarlett
- Huckleberry Finn's long-lost cousin
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,607
7,183
113
How many woman, man, They/Them hours were wasted on this endeavor? The idiotic conversations leading to this decision could probably be a good SNL skit.
They are about to find out that wokeness doesn't save you from stupidity and pride.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

wasabaka

Member
Sep 17, 2012
321
119
43
If they were going to try to name it something so stupid and arbitrary, why would they not do the inverse? Wellbright sounds just as made up and out of left field, but they could still be the W.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,219
2,443
113
This is the result of some Presidentially-appointed-squirrellya$$ed committee that fell victim to some seriously 17d up GroupThink. Hilarious!

MUW, STATE, MVSU, The Corn and the good folks in Stoneville should all be part of the Mississippi State University system, focusing on Ag and Mechanics, Engineering, Computing and Tech. Just one set of athletic teams.

DSU, OM, the Med Center, and USM should all be under JSU and call them all the U of M, U of M-Oxford, U of M-Hattiesburg, and U of M-Cleveland. Again, just one set of athletic teams.

Repurpose the Vaught and build a new stadium in Jackson for Lane's Landsharks -- or maybe they could get primetime back. They'll be playing for the National Championship every year by then -- imagine their NIL money.

Maybe we survive in the SEC or join some other conference or move down to division 2.

The IHL goes from 8 universities to 2. that would save a ton of dollars and improve the product, the output, and probably the state considerably.
Ignoring the political impossibility of that, I think I'd divide it a little different. Give MSU the W and USM. Then you'd have starkville about an hour and a half from Meridian, which is about an hour and a half from Hattiesburg, which is about an hour from the Gulf coast campus.

Then you could give Ole Miss DSU, MVSU, and JSU. Ole Miss would essentially get the delta, Jackson, and Oxford. MSU would get the eastern half of the state down to the coast. That would let each school economize on what they offer at each campus and ideally share as many resources as possible. Alcorn could go either way.

Bringing politics back into it, I think that could possibly mollify the UM and MSU rivalry as that seems like a decently even mix between the two?

Of course USM still has enough clout to stop that and having any of the HBCU's brought under a non-HBCU is a political non-starter, both because I doubt MSU or UM want the headache and the optics of it. But if we were going to dream about doing something that was good for Mississippi, I think that's the way I'd approach it.

A slightly less impossible approach might be to give Ole Miss DSU and MSU the W and USM, and cosolidate the HBCU's under JSU. Ole Miss would not like that because it'd put a lot of power under MSU, but the flipside of that is it would divide resources between Starkville and Hattiesburg, so maybe you could convince them that's ok.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,454
3,372
113
They are about to find out that wokeness doesn't save you from stupidity and pride.
Is this wokeness? How is it woke?

Its just a university that is changing its name to more accurately reflect who it is and who it intends to be instead of being named for what it was in the past. That happens all the time- they go from 'college' to 'university'. They go from 'Cal State Hayward' to 'Cal State East Bay' or from 'University of Missouri - Rolla' to 'Missouri University of Science and Technology'.

The planned name change for The W isnt great, but it doesnt seem to be 'woke'.

Admittedly, at this point that term has been so overused and misused that this may actually be a time when it is used properly and I just cant tell since its become largely meaningless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg and dorndawg

was21

Active member
May 29, 2007
9,634
349
83
So, they'd go from calling it "The W" to the "The B"?
Bold strategy.

Seriously, that's a terrible name. It sounds like a Daycare/Pre-K. I thought maybe it was named after somebody, but no, it's just to highlight that the students are "bright" and "well".
“We are about brightness, enlightenment and wellness,” Miller said. “We are empowering and enlightening. We started looking at our traditions. We study light to bless with light.”

(fart)
It reminds me of one of the Marx brothers films where Groucho was the head honcho of a university. Brightwell would have been a great name for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

Mr. Cook

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2021
2,476
1,537
113
Mississippi Brightwell University, pending Legislative approval


"Mississippi State-Columbus" is the most obvious choice, imo
Let's be honest: Mississippi has never had a proven track record in marketing of any form. Especially the universities -- they all suck at it.
 

dorndawg

Well-known member
Sep 10, 2012
6,982
5,064
113
Is this wokeness? How is it woke?

Its just a university that is changing its name to more accurately reflect who it is and who it intends to be instead of being named for what it was in the past. That happens all the time- they go from 'college' to 'university'. They go from 'Cal State Hayward' to 'Cal State East Bay' or from 'University of Missouri - Rolla' to 'Missouri University of Science and Technology'.

The planned name change for The W isnt great, but it doesnt seem to be 'woke'.

Admittedly, at this point that term has been so overused and misused that this may actually be a time when it is used properly and I just cant tell since its become largely meaningless.
1704820151151.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,607
7,183
113
Ignoring the political impossibility of that, I think I'd divide it a little different. Give MSU the W and USM. Then you'd have starkville about an hour and a half from Meridian, which is about an hour and a half from Hattiesburg, which is about an hour from the Gulf coast campus.

Then you could give Ole Miss DSU, MVSU, and JSU. Ole Miss would essentially get the delta, Jackson, and Oxford. MSU would get the eastern half of the state down to the coast. That would let each school economize on what they offer at each campus and ideally share as many resources as possible. Alcorn could go either way.

Bringing politics back into it, I think that could possibly mollify the UM and MSU rivalry as that seems like a decently even mix between the two?

Of course USM still has enough clout to stop that and having any of the HBCU's brought under a non-HBCU is a political non-starter, both because I doubt MSU or UM want the headache and the optics of it. But if we were going to dream about doing something that was good for Mississippi, I think that's the way I'd approach it.

A slightly less impossible approach might be to give Ole Miss DSU and MSU the W and USM, and cosolidate the HBCU's under JSU. Ole Miss would not like that because it'd put a lot of power under MSU, but the flipside of that is it would divide resources between Starkville and Hattiesburg, so maybe you could convince them that's ok.
MSU and USM are two totally different universities, not to mention the geography, may as well just leave that alone. Same with Ole Miss and Delta State - DSU serves its purpose, as does USM, and they help the economy of Cleveland/Hattiesburg. They have some good niche degrees at both.

Consolidating universities to save money, and basically get rid of having to govern a place, is dumb. It's chasing something that doesn't move the needle. The epitome of short term gain. If combining can make the 'new university', such as MSU and the W, more attractive for the future, it's a great idea. Not everything can be measured in terms of immediately money in minus money out.

This is why Mississippi conservatives cannot be trusted and can't make anything happen, even though they technically are better for the state than Democrats. They cannot get past simple math and understand that sometimes, as government, you must INVEST in certain aspects, especially in education. Not in stupid boondoggles for buddies.
 

thatsbaseball

Well-known member
May 29, 2007
16,596
4,070
113
Is this wokeness? How is it woke?

Its just a university that is changing its name to more accurately reflect who it is and who it intends to be instead of being named for what it was in the past. That happens all the time- they go from 'college' to 'university'. They go from 'Cal State Hayward' to 'Cal State East Bay' or from 'University of Missouri - Rolla' to 'Missouri University of Science and Technology'.

The planned name change for The W isnt great, but it doesnt seem to be 'woke'.

Admittedly, at this point that term has been so overused and misused that this may actually be a time when it is used properly and I just cant tell since its become largely meaningless.
Golfer, with all due respect, my main indicator that this probably is "woke" up to this point is you showing up and exclaiming it's not "woke". LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Peeper

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,219
2,443
113
MSU and USM are two totally different universities, not to mention the geography, may as well just leave that alone. Same with Ole Miss and Delta State - DSU serves its purpose, as does USM, and they help the economy of Cleveland/Hattiesburg. They have some good niche degrees at both.

They would still serve their purpose, just more economically.

Consolidating universities to save money, and basically get rid of having to govern a place, is dumb. It's chasing something that doesn't move the needle. The epitome of short term gain. If combining can make the 'new university', such as MSU and the W, more attractive for the future, it's a great idea. Not everything can be measured in terms of immediately money in minus money out.
That's the entire point. First, it would give some extremely minor cachet to degrees from DSU and the W. There's not much cachet to an MSU or UM degree, but it better than DSU or the W and I guess USM also. Second, we are spreading our resources too thin. It's not going to be some transformative thing, but it's just a way to spend money better. We don't need 8 different university presidents, Controllers, General counsel, etc.

This is why Mississippi conservatives cannot be trusted and can't make anything happen, even though they technically are better for the state than Democrats. They cannot get past simple math and understand that sometimes, as government, you must INVEST in certain aspects, especially in education. Not in stupid boondoggles for buddies.
Again, there is nothing about disinvesting here. You can spend the same amount of money or more. It would just be more efficient and provide a governance structure more likely to benefit the whole state rather than squabble over limited resources and turf protection.

And if you'll notice, conservatives haven't wasted any political capital trying to address this issue. That's probably smart because it'd be a contentious political issue that is in no way transformative. It's just another good thing, if relatively minor, that we can't do because of politics.
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,459
5,389
102
Golfer, with all due respect, my main indicator that this probably is "woke" up to this point is you showing up and exclaiming it's not "woke". LOL
Fair point.

With that stated, Genghis Khan would be considered woke by people here. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgg

Dawgbite

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2011
6,216
4,629
113
My niece is a graduate of The W and is a faculty member currently. She said that they called all the staff into a meeting to announce the new name. After a rambling rah rah speech the new president finally announced the name, silence. After a little while one person finally started clapping and a few joined in. Sounds like it went over like a turd in a punch bowl.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,607
7,183
113
We don't need 8 different university presidents, Controllers, General counsel, etc.
We diverge here, man. Just such a minor expense in the big scheme of things, that will just get wasted elsewhere, and maybe in WORSE ways. Probably something that gets sent out of state. At minimum, we are supporting decent jobs in those communities. Again, just doesn't move the needle....at all. It's the wrong boogeyman. I feel the same way about consolidating all these high schools too, unless a specific circumstance where you have like 4 1A schools or something. But again, this doesn't move your needle, if anything, it points to the fact that yo *** has trouble in your country, if you are resorting to saving a little admin costs by consolidating schools. Short....term.....

Again, there is nothing about disinvesting here. You can spend the same amount of money or more. It would just be more efficient and provide a governance structure more likely to benefit the whole state rather than squabble over limited resources and turf protection.
Don't disagree fully, but there's a lot of middle ground. MSU and the W, within 25 miles and both considered in the same GTR region, is in that middle ground. We may never be able to consolidate anywhere else, but that one made too much sense.

Of course the best consolidation back in the day would have been to never split Ole Miss and MSU.
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,459
5,389
102
Re: @johnson86-1 & @OG Goat Holder consolidation discussion.

Bored Bugs Bunny GIF by MOODMAN


Seriously though, you’re shuffling chairs on the Slytanic.

Even if the campuses are merged, that simply means that employees would get title changes.

Presidents would be Vice Presidents in charge of the campus and would have to have counsel — who if they’re not based in the area — would become associate counsels.

And as to a potential argument about you don’t have to have a campus vice president, the answer to that is that there’d need to be someone who people at that location could call upon because Presidents are busy and are not often available.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,454
3,372
113
Golfer, with all due respect, my main indicator that this probably is "woke" up to this point is you showing up and exclaiming it's not "woke". LOL
Ha, touche.
I did view it as me asking how is it woke and pointing out that from what I have now read, the name change seems like just another name change, which are common at regional and smaller private universities.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,459
5,389
102
Ha, touche.
I did view it as me asking how is it woke and pointing out that from what I have now read, the name change seems like just another name change, which are common at regional and smaller private universities.
Yep.

But to be fair, the name change was supposed to be more inclusive.

Men are people too after all.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
7,607
7,183
113
Seriously though, you’re shuffling chairs on the Slytanic.
And what is the Slytanic? My belief is, it is the state of Mississippi.

So what's the best way to try and keep the Slytanic afloat? It ain't to play defense and cut admin positions at the colleges. That's like trying to put a tarp over the hole cut by the iceberg. Hell we talk about needing jobs in the state, now we're going to cut them?

I think we'd be better off using the colleges to team up with economic development entities to try and develop around your college towns, since that's about all the economy we got.

ETA: This is probably a side thread, but people in MS talk about muh public schools like that's the biggest indicator of a small town's success. People are so misguided here. But I'll say this - yeah, they ARE important to them, but not because of some misguided ideals about muh public schools, it's because the schools themselves are EMPLOYERS.

Now you may say, well why do you think colleges are beacons for innovation and not high schools? Fair point, but I would say there is a much higher level of that at the institutes of higher learning. But hey....that's why I'm not about cutting schools even at the high school levels either - I just don't believe there's some innovation going on in high schools that may save the state. There's at least a glimmer of hope at the universities.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login