Not tough enough…

pendal1

Junior
Apr 24, 2003
6,328
208
63
You earlier referenced the 97 season. Did you sit in the stands when Joe got pounded by Michigan and choked to end the season with two losses, one to an unranked team? That was a horrible example on your part. Did you sit in the stands when Joe lost 9 in a row to Michigan? Homer.
No doubt. Later in his career joe had his struggles but even late in his career he could still win a big game or two. Joe came back after the dark years to win two more BIG titles and I won't get into how great his prime was. The point is joe won big games. You can point to his failures and they're real and factual but james has an absolute embarrassing record against top 10. That's a fact too.
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
No doubt. Later in his career joe had his struggles but even late in his career he could still win a big game or two. Joe came back after the dark years to win two more BIG titles and I won't get into how great his prime was. The point is joe won big games. You can point to his failures and they're real and factual but james has an absolute embarrassing record against top 10. That's a fact too.
13-33 over 46 years against top 5 teams. 0-4 vs Bear Bryant. Losing records vs Tressel, Carr, and Ferentz. Joe won his fair share of big games but I’m tired of the misconception that he won all, or even most, of them. He didn’t. That’s BS and people remembering what they want to remember.
 
Last edited:

pendal1

Junior
Apr 24, 2003
6,328
208
63
13-33 over 46 years against top 10 teams.
Yeah, the later years hurt his record. He also had five undefeated seasons and played in four NC games including back to back. And the win over Miami is a lesson in winning with lesser talent. Big game James wouldn't win 13 games against top ten in 100 years.
And one more thing since you like to **** on Paterno - that stadium and fanbase are because of the 13-33 guy. During his prime he was considered the best coach in the country and in 86 Penn State was considered the best program in the country. Under Franklin we are considered the biggest fraud in the country.
 

DaytonRickster

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
1,406
1,507
113
Coaching put the QB is bad situations.
Against ND we should have been playing for OT considering our WRs couldn't get open all day
Last night the play calling for 3 quarters was horrific and then the final play call (why are we running that to the short side of the field) was ridiculous. Why didn't we pound Kaytron? When you put guys into a position to fail they likely will.
Also the defense had a chance to win both games and couldn't make stops. How is that on Allar?
WHY? :
- Why does a first year QB starter for our opponent look more poised than PSU's 3rd year stater? QB Coaching and bad offensive scheme.
- Why did the PSU OC have such a terrible game plan which left PSU's defense on the field for too many minutes to be pounded by a huge Oregon OL?
- Why did the PSU OC select that last play (a pass) to the crowded short side of the field when they successfully ran the ball for the 1st OT TD?
- Why did PSU not go to max protect earlier in the game like they did with the long TD pass to Ross? Inattentive OC too tied to gimmicks.
- Why can a Freshman WR from Oregon be successful and the PSU receivers have trouble finding open space? Lousy PSU scheme.
- Why was Singleton in the game at key junctures when he can't break tackles?

Given the absolute 1st three quarters of offensive ineptitude, I'd say the defense held on as long as they physically could. They were exhausted.

Time for some paycuts for the offensive staff and some of the offensive players. They are being paid well and fans should demand ROI, especially if true that Allar's NIL deal is in the $2-3 million range.

-
 

Georgia Peach

Senior
Oct 28, 2021
279
467
63
I agree with everything you are saying.

Almost every team in college football would love to be as successful as Penn State has been under Franklin. I would say Kirby Smart, Ryan Day, and Dan Lanning would be the coaches who have had more success during that time period. Saban is retired and Dabo Sweeney's program is a mess right now. Do you think either of those 3 are going to leave their program to come to Penn State?

I think you just supported my argument. You listed the only two that you feel are going to be better and they are probably unattainable.
LOL. Georgia fans want to fire Kirby Smart today because he is 1-7 against Bama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LB99

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
Yeah, the later years hurt his record. He also had five undefeated seasons and played in four NC games including back to back. And the win over Miami is a lesson in winning with lesser talent. Big game James wouldn't win 13 games against top ten in 100 years.
And one more thing since you like to **** on Paterno - that stadium and fanbase are because of the 13-33 guy. During his prime he was considered the best coach in the country and in 86 Penn State was considered the best program in the country. Under Franklin we are considered the biggest fraud in the country.
If I remember correctly, something like 8 of those 13 wins vs top 5 teams came in the 80’s. The 80’s were very, very good, but in the 60’s, 70’s, 90’s and 2000’s he was very underwhelming against top teams. It wasn’t just late in his career. I know that’s very hard for some to accept, but that’s reality. I’m not shitting on Paterno. I’m telling you the stats for his career. He was a great coach, but he didn’t walk on water like some like to remember him. If that pisses you off, that’s on you.
 
Last edited:

MacNit

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,698
1,500
113
Urban would absolutely win more games, recruit higher ranked players, and our team would be tougher. He’d also recruit more POS human beings, grades would drop overall, most of the staff would hate him, and players would be getting in trouble left and right.
This is no longer college football w/ student athletes- it is minor league football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaconNitt

MacNit

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,698
1,500
113
Would you have traded the sh^tshow of 2000-2004 for the current run of just two loss seasons, a conference championship berth and making the final four? Homer.
If I knew it included the complete package of winningest cosch of all time and best bowl game record of all time - yes indeed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBeBlockin

MacNit

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,698
1,500
113
Nah. You don’t get to play AD to fire Franklin then cop out on giving us your “long list” coaching candidates that would get PSU over the top without regression. That’s a lazy cop out on your part. Let’s have the list.
The list is too long. I am not a data entry specialist. Dozens of coaches could take PSU resources and produce the second worst big game coaching rectified in NCAA history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psu00 and Ram20

MacNit

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,698
1,500
113
13-33 over 46 years against top 10 teams. 0-4 vs Bear Bryant. Losing records vs Tressel, Carr, and Ferentz. Joe won his fair share of big games but I’m tired of the misconception that he won all, or even most, of them. He didn’t. That’s BS and people remembering what they want to remember.
Who’s saying that. But he does have one of the very best record in the biggest of games. Franklin has the 2nd worst EVER. And he has a punching chance to make the worst until Krafty stops the madness.

Juxtapose that against tne winningest coach of all time. I mean what is even tne argument?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pendal1 and PSU87

JohnJumba

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2016
1,510
1,007
113
I'm on the phone, wish I could link Karl Malden at the end of Nevada Smith..... You haven't got the guts, You haven't got the guts..
 

PSU87

All-Conference
Jun 8, 2001
1,812
3,732
113
13-33 over 46 years against top 10 teams. 0-4 vs Bear Bryant. Losing records vs Tressel, Carr, and Ferentz. Joe won his fair share of big games but I’m tired of the misconception that he won all, or even most, of them. He didn’t. That’s BS and people remembering what they want to reremember.
The misconception is yours, not ours.

Nobody is saying CJF needs to win all or even "most" of them. Can we start off with more than once a decade?
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
The misconception is yours, not ours.

Nobody is saying CJF needs to win all or even "most" of them. Can we start off with more than once a decade?
Sure. By “ours” you mean the contingent of Joe homers that think he won the biggest games routinely?
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
Who’s saying that. But he does have one of the very best record in the biggest of games. Franklin has the 2nd worst EVER. And he has a punching chance to make the worst until Krafty stops the madness.

Juxtapose that against tne winningest coach of all time. I mean what is even tne argument?
You sure do a lot of mental gymnastics to avoid the reality of the numbers in the past.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MaconNitt

80lion

Redshirt
Sep 25, 2007
2
2
3
Penn State typically plays very tentatively in these games, we don’t play with confidence, especially on offense. It’s a long shot, but a coach who is aggressive and confident is what we need. Matt Campbell from Iowa State comes to mind. His teams beat more talented teams and play with confidence.
 

MaconNitt

All-Conference
Oct 18, 2016
1,062
1,989
113
I agree with everything you are saying.

Almost every team in college football would love to be as successful as Penn State has been under Franklin. I would say Kirby Smart, Ryan Day, and Dan Lanning would be the coaches who have had more success during that time period. Saban is retired and Dabo Sweeney's program is a mess right now. Do you think either of those 3 are going to leave their program to come to Penn State?
nope, all three were born on third base and think they hit a triple, though talented coaches for sure they were blessed with administrations and donors who value sports above all else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LB99

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
Penn State typically plays very tentatively in these games, we don’t play with confidence, especially on offense. It’s a long shot, but a coach who is aggressive and confident is what we need. Matt Campbell from Iowa State comes to mind. His teams beat more talented teams and play with confidence.
Matt Campbell is an interesting thought. I like the guy and respect him and his accomplishments. Would he leave a place that he is very comfortable at? Would he be able to recruit at a level at PSU that would allow him to be competitive in the B1G? Would he be able to get the athletes to match Oregon, OSU, Michigan and coach them up? I liked Fran Brown at Syracuse and thought he was on the rise after last week’s win. Then they laid an egg vs Duke yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grinagrin

DaytonRickster

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
1,406
1,507
113
Matt Campbell is an interesting thought. I like the guy and respect him and his accomplishments. Would he leave a place that he is very comfortable at? Would he be able to recruit at a level at PSU that would allow him to be competitive in the B1G? Would he be able to get the athletes to match Oregon, OSU, Michigan and coach them up? I liked Fran Brown at Syracuse and thought he was on the rise after last week’s win. Then they laid an egg vs Duke yesterday.
Syracuse lost their starting QB in the Clemson game after they had built a sizeable lead. Their backup played against Duke and it was disastrous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grinagrin and LB99

pendal1

Junior
Apr 24, 2003
6,328
208
63
If I remember correctly, something like 8 of those 13 wins vs top 10 teams came in the 80’s. The 80’s were very, very good, but in the 60’s, 70’s, 90’s and 2000’s he was very underwhelming against top teams. It wasn’t just late in his career. I know that’s very hard for some to accept, but that’s reality. I’m not shitting on Paterno. I’m telling you the stats for his career. He was a great coach, but he didn’t walk on water like some like to remember him. If that pisses you off, that’s on you.
No one is saying he walked on water but I did forget to mention his bowl record was a stellar 24-12 too. I just think it's low rent that when we are discussing Franklin some have to constantly bring up joe in a negative way. Joe's gone. We should focus on Franklin.
 

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
No one is saying he walked on water but I did forget to mention his bowl record was a stellar 24-12 too. I just think it's low rent that when we are discussing Franklin some have to constantly bring up joe in a negative way. Joe's gone. We should focus on Franklin.
I’m not the one who brought up Joe. MacNit did. He does it nonstop. There was also a thread titled “What would Joe do”. So, if you don’t want to talk about Joe, tell the Joe homers to stop comparing Franklin to him constantly. Or at least, be able to accept Joe’s stats without being triggered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moogy

Ram20

Senior
Jul 29, 2013
408
770
93
I would inquire to Lane Kiffin as well as the TN coach....

Fitzgerald
You'll get laughed at, but I actually don't think its a crazy idea. Guy is steaming pissed at his alma matter and was mostly a really good coach until the end. Kind of like Beilema, won't be pretty always but the team will be disciplined and tough. Worry about recruiting with him for sure.
 

pendal1

Junior
Apr 24, 2003
6,328
208
63
I’m not the one who brought up Joe. MacNit did. He does it nonstop. There was also a thread titled “What would Joe do”. So, if you don’t want to talk about Joe, tell the Joe homers to stop comparing Franklin to him constantly. Or at least, be able to accept Joe’s stats without being triggered.
You seem to have a problem, or get triggered as you like to say, if folks mention joe. That's on you. We know the stats. I lived it. I loved those days. But Franklin is the coach now and we should all agree his record against any ranked opponents is abysmal. If that triggers Franklin homers that's on them.
 

MacNit

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
1,698
1,500
113
I’m not the one who brought up Joe. MacNit did. He does it nonstop. There was also a thread titled “What would Joe do”. So, if you don’t want to talk about Joe, tell the Joe homers to stop comparing Franklin to him constantly. Or at least, be able to accept Joe’s stats without being triggered.
Comparison? Laughable.
 

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
1,681
2,708
113
If I remember correctly, something like 8 of those 13 wins vs top 10 teams came in the 80’s. The 80’s were very, very good, but in the 60’s, 70’s, 90’s and 2000’s he was very underwhelming against top teams. It wasn’t just late in his career. I know that’s very hard for some to accept, but that’s reality. I’m not shitting on Paterno.
Pure nonsense is NOT "reality".
You have no idea what you are talking (writing) about. Not even close.

PSU vs Top 10:

1970s: 5-8
1980s: 15-11
1990s: 9-12

Total: 29-31 Winning percentage 48%

2000s: 3-10 So total winning percentage 44% (32-41) if adding in 2000s
If looking at JVP's entire tenure - add in late 1966-69: 3-4, and 2010/2011: 0-3.... and you have 42% winning percentage for entire tenure.

Under HCJF: 4-21 Winning Percentage 16%

It is what it is. And it is a night-and-day difference.


1970 Penn State Nittany Lions Schedule and Results | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
1970s
1972:
Tennessee - Loss
Oklahoma - Loss
1975:
OSU - Loss
WVU - Win
Alabama - Loss
1976:
OSU - Loss
Pitt - Loss
1977:
Houston - Win
Pitt - Win
1978:
OSU - Win
Maryland - Win
Alabama - Loss
1979:
Nebraska - Loss

1980s
1980:
Nebraska - Loss
Missouri - Win
Pitt - Loss
1981:
Alabama - Loss
Pitt - Win
USC - Win
1982:
Nebraska - Win
Alabama - Loss
Pitt - Win
Georgia - Win
1983:
Nebraska - Loss
Alabama - Win
West Virginia - Win
1984:
Iowa - Win
Texas - Loss
Boston College - Win
1985:
Marylnad - Win
Alabama - Win
Oklahoma - Loss
1986:
Alabama - Win
Miami - Win
1987:
Notre Dame - Win
1988:
West Virginia - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss
1989:
Alabama - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss

1990s
1990:
USC - Loss
Notre Dame - Win
Florida State - Loss
1991:
Georgia Tech - Win
Miami - Loss
Tennessee - Win
1992:
Miami - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss
1993:
Ohio State - Loss
Tennessee - Win
1994:
Michigan - Win
1995:
Ohio State - Loss
Northwestern - Loss
1996:
USC - Win
Ohio State -Loss
1997:
Ohio State - Win
Michigan - Loss
Florida - Loss
1998:
Ohio State - Loss
1999:
Arizona - Win
Miami - Win
 
Last edited:

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
2,973
2,021
113
Pure nonsense is NOT "reality".
You have no idea what you are talking (writing) about. Not even close.

PSU vs Top 10:

1970s: 5-8
1980s: 15-11
1990s: 9-12

Total: 29-31 Winning percentage 48%

2000s: 3-10 So total winning percentage 44% (32-41) if adding in 2000s
If looking at JVP's entire tenure - add in late 1966-69: 3-4, and 2010/2011: 0-3.... and you have 42% winning percentage for entire tenure.

Under HCJF: 4-21 Winning Percentage 16%

It is what it is. And it is a night-and-day difference.


1970 Penn State Nittany Lions Schedule and Results | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
1970s
1972:
Tennessee - Loss
Oklahoma - Loss
1975:
OSU - Loss
WVU - Win
Alabama - Loss
1976:
OSU - Loss
Pitt - Loss
1977:
Houston - Win
Pitt - Win
1978:
OSU - Win
Maryland - Win
Alabama - Loss
1979:
Nebraska - Loss

1980s
1980:
Nebraska - Loss
Missouri - Win
Pitt - Loss
1981:
Alabama - Loss
Pitt - Win
USC - Win
1982:
Nebraska - Win
Alabama - Loss
Pitt - Win
Georgia - Win
1983:
Nebraska - Loss
Alabama - Win
West Virginia - Win
1984:
Iowa - Win
Texas - Loss
Boston College - Win
1985:
Marylnad - Win
Alabama - Win
Oklahoma - Loss
1986:
Alabama - Win
Miami - Win
1987:
Notre Dame - Win
1988:
West Virginia - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss
1989:
Alabama - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss

1990s
1990:
USC - Loss
Notre Dame - Win
Florida State - Loss
1991:
Georgia Tech - Win
Miami - Loss
Tennessee - Win
1992:
Miami - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss
1993:
Ohio State - Loss
Tennessee - Win
1994:
Michigan - Win
1995:
Ohio State - Loss
Northwestern - Loss
1996:
USC - Win
Ohio State -Loss
1997:
Ohio State - Win
Michigan - Loss
Florida - Loss
1998:
Ohio State - Loss
1999:
Arizona - Win
Miami - Win
I don’t care about this comparison, as it’s focusing on the wrong things … but if you’re going to do it, it has to be v. FINAL Top 10 teams. For instance, in 1991, you show wins against “top 10” GT and Tennessee. We played then #8 GT in the season opener and won. They ended up 8-5 and unranked. Tennessee ended up 14th.
 

Nits1989

All-Conference
Oct 29, 2021
936
1,267
93
I don’t care about this comparison, as it’s focusing on the wrong things … but if you’re going to do it, it has to be v. FINAL Top 10 teams. For instance, in 1991, you show wins against “top 10” GT and Tennessee. We played then #8 GT in the season opener and won. They ended up 8-5 and unranked. Tennessee ended up 14th.
Tennessee ended up 14 because we beat them in the bowl game. If we lose, they stay top 10. So Joe beat a top 10 Tennessee. The problem right now is Franklin loses to teams like Tennessee so teams like Tennessee stay top 10, and it’s a top 10 loss. Your way of counting significantly devalues some wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pendal1

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
7,840
10,577
113
Pure nonsense is NOT "reality".
You have no idea what you are talking (writing) about. Not even close.

PSU vs Top 10:

1970s: 5-8
1980s: 15-11
1990s: 9-12

Total: 29-31 Winning percentage 48%

2000s: 3-10 So total winning percentage 44% (32-41) if adding in 2000s
If looking at JVP's entire tenure - add in late 1966-69: 3-4, and 2010/2011: 0-3.... and you have 42% winning percentage for entire tenure.

Under HCJF: 4-21 Winning Percentage 16%

It is what it is. And it is a night-and-day difference.


1970 Penn State Nittany Lions Schedule and Results | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
1970s
1972:
Tennessee - Loss
Oklahoma - Loss
1975:
OSU - Loss
WVU - Win
Alabama - Loss
1976:
OSU - Loss
Pitt - Loss
1977:
Houston - Win
Pitt - Win
1978:
OSU - Win
Maryland - Win
Alabama - Loss
1979:
Nebraska - Loss

1980s
1980:
Nebraska - Loss
Missouri - Win
Pitt - Loss
1981:
Alabama - Loss
Pitt - Win
USC - Win
1982:
Nebraska - Win
Alabama - Loss
Pitt - Win
Georgia - Win
1983:
Nebraska - Loss
Alabama - Win
West Virginia - Win
1984:
Iowa - Win
Texas - Loss
Boston College - Win
1985:
Marylnad - Win
Alabama - Win
Oklahoma - Loss
1986:
Alabama - Win
Miami - Win
1987:
Notre Dame - Win
1988:
West Virginia - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss
1989:
Alabama - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss

1990s
1990:
USC - Loss
Notre Dame - Win
Florida State - Loss
1991:
Georgia Tech - Win
Miami - Loss
Tennessee - Win
1992:
Miami - Loss
Notre Dame - Loss
1993:
Ohio State - Loss
Tennessee - Win
1994:
Michigan - Win
1995:
Ohio State - Loss
Northwestern - Loss
1996:
USC - Win
Ohio State -Loss
1997:
Ohio State - Win
Michigan - Loss
Florida - Loss
1998:
Ohio State - Loss
1999:
Arizona - Win
Miami - Win
Sorry. I misspoke. You are right. My mistake. It was against top 5 teams.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: grinagrin

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
2,973
2,021
113
Tennessee ended up 14 because we beat them in the bowl game. If we lose, they stay top 10. So Joe beat a top 10 Tennessee. The problem right now is Franklin loses to teams like Tennessee so teams like Tennessee stay top 10, and it’s a top 10 loss. Your way of counting significantly devalues some wins.

“Devalues” = properly values. Of course they fell out of the top 10 when we beat them, since they were #10 when we faced them. And? You guys want to participate in this stupid comparative … so at least do it correctly. And that is “correctly.”

“We don’t like the outcome when we think rationally, so let’s act irrationally” isn’t a valid reason for refusing to think and behave properly.
 

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
2,973
2,021
113
Yeah, the later years hurt his record. He also had five undefeated seasons and played in four NC games including back to back. And the win over Miami is a lesson in winning with lesser talent. Big game James wouldn't win 13 games against top ten in 100 years.
And one more thing since you like to **** on Paterno - that stadium and fanbase are because of the 13-33 guy. During his prime he was considered the best coach in the country and in 86 Penn State was considered the best program in the country. Under Franklin we are considered the biggest fraud in the country.


Move on.