It’s really more about STATES position in the east and how nothing looks to change. Happy for 10. Awesome. But STATE is kinda irrelevant in the national convo.
You kind of flogged that horse last week in the Rutgers game thread. I just don't see the relevance of those type of arguments in a game thread.
In today's game thread, which concluded the regular season, it's kind of natural at the end of it to reflect on the season.
Again, PSU was unranked to start the season, and looks as though they'll finish the regular season in the top 10. To me, that's the key aspect of the season.
Did PSU do as well as I wanted this year? No. I want them to be undefeated every season. But I've been around long enough to know that undefeated seasons don't happen all that frequently. So while my hope and goal each year is for them to be undefeated, I've never thrown a public temper tantrum when PSU comes up short of that level.
As to your specific point, I think you're exaggerating a bit. Michigan was below PSU for several years in the East. They (Michigan) have gotten lucky in the past two years in that they got some key OL and DL recruits, which enabled them to compete on a higher level than they had been for quite a few years. So, despite what you stated, things do change. PSU could be on the brink of flipping the narrative with the recruiting they've done of late on the OL. Will those prospects develop as expected? Who knows. Will those prospects stay healthy? Who knows. Too many variables makes it difficult for anyone to predict the future. In short, these things are not so cut and dry.
Alabama, Georgia, and tOSU have been pretty consistent as being in the CFP picture. Clemson was there but may be moving out of it. Michigan wasn't there for quite some time, and just recently has been in the picture. Nobody has a clue if they'll stay there. IMHO, PSU is on the cusp, as are a few other teams (USC looks to be moving toward that level).