OT: Don't raise your children in Gulfport or Memphis

Status
Not open for further replies.

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,973
8,423
113
Progressives help build nice cities with lots of cool things to do. I like travelling to progressive cities. They ruin parts of them because of their pathological tolerance and acceptance of dysfunction and disorder from people belonging to groups they believe shouldn't be held to the same standards they have for themselves and their kids.
Truth.

And it ain’t just liberals, it’s just life and the sooner people realize for there be nice shlt on this earth, there usually has to be crappy shlt too where shlt gets done. New York is New York because Newark is Newark.

It’s a cold world out there, stay frosty my 6 pack bros.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,624
2,926
113
Progressives help build nice cities with lots of cool things to do. I like travelling to progressive cities. They ruin parts of them because of their pathological tolerance and acceptance of dysfunction and disorder from people belonging to groups they believe shouldn't be held to the same standards they have for themselves and their kids.
Not really. Progressive policies are generally a luxury good that you can only afford after you have something nice.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
Not really. Progressive policies are generally a luxury good that you can only afford after you have something nice.
It's not hard to have nice things. Austin is a cool city and then the far left decided to let the homeless population grow, defund the police and other nonsense. Don't do that crap. Europe is poorer than the US but has nice things in cities for citizens to enjoy: museums, parks, arenas, markets, public transport and more cops on patrol. Build nice things and let law-abiding citizens enjoy them and keep the riff raff away as much as possible. San Fran was nice before lefties ruined parts of it. NYC got cleaned up. It can happen. White progressives went all retarded after George Floyd and screwed some places up. Conservatives need to accept that taxes can do some good and so can government.
 
Last edited:

PBDog

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2021
1,033
757
113

Seattle also spends alot of money taking care of the homeless which is good but it also exacerbates the problem.

And the root cause of most of the homelessness in King County is the affordability of housing.
no the root cause of homelessness is drugs and the easy access to it and this include MJ. it’s also good business: these lib criminal NGO have embezzled 10x the money needed to built every homeless crackhead a home. there’s also good money to be made in open borders
 

BossDawg78

Active member
Jan 25, 2015
3,403
438
83
I'd let a school of hammerhead sharks raise my kids before I sent them anywhere on (ESPECIALLY) the West coast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PBDog

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,817
3,695
113
Homeschool is the answer
I am smart enough to know I am not smart enough to teach my kids what they have learned and will learn in the coming years.

But if others are able smart enough in so many subjects to competently challenge and teach, more power to em.
AP Chem, AP Physics, AP Bio, Pottery, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Calc, AP LitLang...17 that.
Even the regular classes of all those...17 that.

Genuinely though- people that can teach all the subjects a middle schooler and high schooler have are incredible. That's amazing.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
23,458
11,968
113
I am smart enough to know I am not smart enough to teach my kids what they have learned and will learn in the coming years.

But if others are able smart enough in so many subjects to competently challenge and teach, more power to em.
AP Chem, AP Physics, AP Bio, Pottery, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Calc, AP LitLang...17 that.
Even the regular classes of all those...17 that.

Genuinely though- people that can teach all the subjects a middle schooler and high schooler have are incredible. That's amazing.
There are plenty of resources to home school and the parents not have a firm grasp of the more challenging subjects. It can be done. I wouldn’t do it personally but it’s out there.
 

Bulldog Bruce

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2007
3,658
2,766
113
In all seriousness, that’s why all these lists are dumb. Even the worst cities in the country have a nice suburb or two.

But in general, there are still nice overall cities. Seattle is one of them. Memphis is not. But if the driver is a cheaper COL, then it can be fine (which it normally is, if we get down to the heart of the matter). But that comes with certain disadvantages. Those folks could just move to a nicer area of Seattle if it was truly all about crime.

The crime and stuff makes for a better drama story to tell their new neighbors, rather than the fact that they wanted more affordable housing.
It's not just about crime. These people that I have personally talked to named multiple things that made them leave. Affordability, quality of life, too much leftism, people overall more upset with the world, lack of friendliness as it used to be, etc.
 

KentuckyDawg13

Active member
Aug 15, 2006
1,794
428
83
As a native of Gulfport, I agree. Compared to the numerous places I have lived in this country, Gulfport is the low point.
In addition, I lived in Memphis for 5 yrs post graduating from MSU. It sucks.
 

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Truth.

And it ain’t just liberals, it’s just life and the sooner people realize for there be nice shlt on this earth, there usually has to be crappy shlt too where shlt gets done. New York is New York because Newark is Newark.

It’s a cold world out there, stay frosty my 6 pack bros.
Some truth, a lot of crap. It's true that it's easier to reduce crime if you ignore pesky things like civil liberties and treating citizens as something more than pieces of crap that are assumed guilty on sight. Liberals are trying to raise the bar as to how our police forces treat our citizens. Maybe that is destined to increase crime, but I for one don't believe so. It's hard, but all good things are hard to do. So do we want to roll up our sleeves and do the hard work, or declare it too hard and just give up on the principles this country was founded on?

But hey, if libs keep trying and can't make this work....they'll adjust. They won't keep insisting on the same failed policies for a hundred years. That's why they are better than conservatives.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,973
8,423
113
Some truth, a lot of crap. It's true that it's easier to reduce crime if you ignore pesky things like civil liberties and treating citizens as something more than pieces of crap that are assumed guilty on sight. Liberals are trying to raise the bar as to how our police forces treat our citizens. Maybe that is destined to increase crime, but I for one don't believe so. It's hard, but all good things are hard to do. So do we want to roll up our sleeves and do the hard work, or declare it too hard and just give up on the principles this country was founded on?

But hey, if libs keep trying and can't make this work....they'll adjust. They won't keep insisting on the same failed policies for a hundred years. That's why they are better than conservatives.
Our policing policies are not failed. We actually have a very safe country overall and I for one would like to keep it that way.

You think people are inherently good, but they aren't. The lowest common denominator will do everything possible to skirt the system, and dealing with them by force is really all they know or understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Studentdawg06
Jul 10, 2009
540
112
28
As a native of Gulfport, I agree. Compared to the numerous places I have lived in this country, Gulfport is the low point.
In addition, I lived in Memphis for 5 yrs post graduating from MSU. It sucks.
There are some rough spots that weigh the perception of here down. But it is far from the worst places I've lived in this state.

I've lived all over Mississippi (The Delta, Natchez, NE Jackson, Philadelphia, & Starkville) for the first 30 years of life, before being in Gulfport the last 25.

We chose Gulfport, over Coast towns, at the time due to our job locations. We were fortunate enough to educate our children (Now State Alumni! #HailState) in Catholic Schools (for faith-based reasons, not fear/loathing of public schools), so school systems were not the highest priority for us. If the school system would have been of the highest priority, we would have chosen another area of the Coast to live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Our policing policies are not failed. We actually have a very safe country overall and I for one would like to keep it that way.

You think people are inherently good, but they aren't. The lowest common denominator will do everything possible to skirt the system, and dealing with them by force is really all they know or understand.
One, I never said failed. The question is should we be seeking improvement? And, are things getting worse as is? The militarization of our police forces over the last couple decades IS the impetus for a lot of desired reform, if ya didn't realize. I for one think that massive change requires a little course correction in how we do police oversight, for the sake of freedom. Freedom is easy to opine for, difficult to do in practice. Case in point right here.

I don't think people are inherently good. Try again. (Cops included. Maybe you should apply that line of thought to them?) I'm all for harsh punishment for the worst offenders. I just don't think we do that well at all right now. We harshly punish a TON of non-violent, petty offenders, turning them into hardened criminals and then releasing them, rather than truly trying to rehabilitate them. We punish the worst offenders less to make room for the former as well. And we don't do a good job at all of sorting between the worst offenders, the petty criminals, and the innocent. But this is all criminal justice reform, not policing reform (mostly).
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
Liberals are trying to raise the bar as to how our police forces treat our citizens. Maybe that is destined to increase crime, but I for one don't believe so. It's hard, but all good things are hard to do. So do we want to roll up our sleeves and do the hard work, or declare it too hard and just give up on the principles this country was founded on?
Those policies have led to an increase of over 4,000 dead black Americans since George Floyd. Good intentions don't mean good outcomes. I do recommend being rich enough to not have to live in neighborhoods where criminals are allowed to terrorize other citizens. America has incredibly high rates of crime. It's done by a small percentage of the population. Put them in prison and the crime rate will decline (see recent history). Also prosecute and imprison corrupt cops and hope more liberals interested in police reforms become actually police officers and not just critics on the outside looking in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thatsbaseball

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
One, I never said failed. The question is should we be seeking improvement? And, are things getting worse as is? The militarization of our police forces over the last couple decades IS the impetus for a lot of desired reform, if ya didn't realize.

. We harshly punish a TON of non-violent, petty offenders, turning them into hardened criminals and then releasing them, rather than truly trying to rehabilitate them. We punish the worst offenders less to make room for the former as well. And we don't do a good job at all of sorting between the worst offenders, the petty criminals, and the innocent. But this is all criminal justice reform, not policing reform (mostly).
Militarization of the police is overstated. It's happened, to a ridiculous degree but at times police are actually outgunned.

We actually don't punish a ton of non-violent, petty offenders. That's not true and we don't make room for them by releasing worse offenders who are punished less. That's not even remotely true. It happens rarely and gets over publicized so some Americans think we have a bunch of potheads in prison for possession which is not the case.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113

They're just trying to feed their families. This is what white supremacy and a corrupt judicial system, our school to prison pipeline and cutting off funds for after school programs forces people to do.***
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,817
3,695
113
Those policies have led to an increase of over 4,000 dead black Americans since George Floyd. Good intentions don't mean good outcomes. I do recommend being rich enough to not have to live in neighborhoods where criminals are allowed to terrorize other citizens. America has incredibly high rates of crime. It's done by a small percentage of the population. Put them in prison and the crime rate will decline (see recent history). Also prosecute and imprison corrupt cops and hope more liberals interested in police reforms become actually police officers and not just critics on the outside looking in.
You gotta provide a link when you make this sort of claim. I mean, come on now- BoomBoom posted a general statement about improving how groups of people are treated by police, and you post a claim that has a specific number tied to specific policies.

I am not doubting your stats, but I(and I assume BoomBoom) dont even know what you are referring to.
4000 people are dead in the last 4 years, and they wouldnt be dead if policies hadnt changed? That is really sad to see, but I also would be interested to see how such a stat is even calculated.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
One of the issues in this country, especially post racial reckoning since George Floyd, is that we accept that no one is above the law but not all of us accept that some people are below the law. That is, we're seeing prosecutors, judges, activists on the left claiming that someone's ethnicity, economic status or other observable characteristic should be considered in determining whether they should spend time in jail or prison.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
You gotta provide a link when you make this sort of claim. I mean, come on now- BoomBoom posted a general statement about improving how groups of people are treated by police, and you post a claim that has a specific number tied to specific policies.

I am not doubting your stats, but I(and I assume BoomBoom) dont even know what you are referring to.
4000 people are dead in the last 4 years, and they wouldnt be dead if policies hadnt changed? That is really sad to see, but I also would be interested to see how such a stat is even calculated.
Crime increased dramatically in a number of cities after the racial reckoning and it concentrated in black neighborhoods as the police pulled back. That's well documented. During this period, black women had a higher murder rate than white men and white American men have a much higher murder rate than white European men. "The homicide rate among Black victims in the United States was 23.41 per 100,000. For that year, the overall national homicide rate was 6.03 per 100,000. For whites, the national homicide rate was 3.24 per 100,000. The Black homicide victimization rate was nearly four times the overall homicide victimization rate (23.41 per 100,000 compared to 6.03 per 100,000) and seven times the white homicide victimization rate (23.41 per 100,000 compared to 3.24 per 100,000). From 2019 to 2020, the Black homicide victimization rate increased by 29 percent (from 18.08 per 100,000 in 2019 to 23.41 per 100,000 in 2020). The rate of 23.41 per 100,000 in 2020 was the highest Black homicide victimization rate in the 17-year history of this study. Additional information contained in the FBI SHR data on Black homicide victimization is below."

 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,817
3,695
113
One of the issues in this country, especially post racial reckoning since George Floyd, is that we accept that no one is above the law but not all of us accept that some people are below the law. That is, we're seeing prosecutors, judges, activists on the left claiming that someone's ethnicity, economic status or other observable characteristic should be considered in determining whether they should spend time in jail or prison.
What if, as a society, the needle has moved to a point where what was a prisonable offense in decades past is no longer viewed as a good reason to go to prison now?
Do you agree with that societal change?

To be clear, I recognize that my question is blind to the observable characteristics part of your comment. I dont disagree with you- ideally, the law and sentencing is blind to such things.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
What's interesting is that police killed around 20 unarmed Black Americans the year George Floyd was murdered and it's been like that for quite some time. The police obviously killed more per year years earlier including some pretty awful instances (Amadou Diallo). The police kill more unarmed whites than unarmed blacks but so many Americans think otherwise. There seems to be a concerted effort to avoid learning crime stats by a lot of Americans.
 

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,511
5,645
113
Yeah. And it was incredibly overblown by how media portrayed it.
I was there once during the period when Chaz/Chop was popular with media because I have family that lives in a nearby suburb, and once a few months just before it was set up.

It just wasn't close to as chaotic as portrayed and was easy to see as a visitor who had been to the metro/city/neighborhood many times.
It also was a really odd thing to see, since I hadn't seen such a thing before.
I didn't like it's existence and don't think the city properly handled its creation.
To be clear I don't want to live in/next to such an area of a city.
I'm back from San Francisco recently and I had a similar experience in that I was expecting fentanyl zombies on every square inch but I actually saw more of those my last time in Nashville. From my brief time in the city, it didn't look much different than my last visit years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorndawg

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
What if, as a society, the needle has moved to a point where what was a prisonable offense in decades past is no longer viewed as a good reason to go to prison now?
Do you agree with that societal change?
Maybe. What has the reduction from felony to misdemeanor for stealing less than $1,000 in merch done in a number of cities? Has it made the lives of poor black people better? I would simply remove the criminals and imprison them. It's not a lot. Less than 1% would be fine and make cities so much safer for the 99%
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,624
2,926
113
It's not hard to have nice things. Austin is a cool city and then the far left decided to let the homeless population grow, defund the police and other nonsense. Don't do that crap. Europe is poorer than the US but has nice things in cities for citizens to enjoy: museums, parks, arenas, markets, public transport and more cops on patrol. Build nice things and let law-abiding citizens enjoy them and keep the riff raff away as much as possible. San Fran was nice before lefties ruined parts of it. NYC got cleaned up. It can happen.

It's not hard in the sense that lots of places have nice things and once you have nice things, it mainly takes just not being stupid to maintain it. But there's no switch to flip. You could give a very smart and competent person dictatorial power over a place like Memphis or Jackson, and they could certainly improve it a lot. Charging for water and sewer and stopping the graft, effective policing and keeping criminals locked up, voucherizing education, etc. But at the end of the day, neither Memphis nor Jackson will be as nice or safe as a lot of european cities that put a lot less resources into law enforcement (or even a lot of western or northeastern cities).


White progressives went all retarded after George Floyd and screwed some places up. Conservatives need to accept that taxes can do some good and so can government.

Meh, most conservatives aren't going to ***** about city and local taxes that are effectively spent. Very conservative towns have no problem getting bond issuances overwhelmingly approved when the schools are good. Most conservatives want police to make decent money. They want roads paved. They are happy to have nice parks and libraries and community programs etc. The bitching comes when the money is spent elsewhere on things that aren't high priority, and then they're asking to raise taxes for what should have been high priorities and already paid for.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
It's not hard in the sense that lots of places have nice things and once you have nice things, it mainly takes just not being stupid to maintain it. But there's no switch to flip. You could give a very smart and competent person dictatorial power over a place like Memphis or Jackson, and they could certainly improve it a lot. Charging for water and sewer and stopping the graft, effective policing and keeping criminals locked up, voucherizing education, etc. But at the end of the day, neither Memphis nor Jackson will be as nice or safe as a lot of european cities that put a lot less resources into law enforcement (or even a lot of western or northeastern cities).




Meh, most conservatives aren't going to ***** about city and local taxes that are effectively spent. Very conservative towns have no problem getting bond issuances overwhelmingly approved when the schools are good. Most conservatives want police to make decent money. They want roads paved. They are happy to have nice parks and libraries and community programs etc. The bitching comes when the money is spent elsewhere on things that aren't high priority, and then they're asking to raise taxes for what should have been high priorities and already paid for.
Would conservatives vote to increase taxes to pay for additional police officer or would they say cut the budget to do that?

"city and local taxes that are effectively spent." Good luck getting people to agree on what "effectively spent" means. That's dependent on ideology
 

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Those policies have led to an increase of over 4,000 dead black Americans since George Floyd.
Correlation is not causation.
Good intentions don't mean good outcomes. I do recommend being rich enough to not have to live in neighborhoods where criminals are allowed to terrorize other citizens.
good advice.
America has incredibly high rates of crime.
no, it doesnt.
It's done by a small percentage of the population.
Depends entirely on what you define as crime.
Put them in prison and the crime rate will decline (see recent history).
that was tried and didnt work. We have more per capira incarcerarion than any other nation, by far. Yet you claim we have very high crime. Can't you see a piece doesn't fit there?
Also prosecute and imprison corrupt cops and hope more liberals interested in police reforms become actually police officers and not just critics on the outside looking in.
Agreed.
 

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Militarization of the police is overstated. It's happened, to a ridiculous degree but at times police are actually outgunned.
It's not the weaponry, it's the attitude.
We actually don't punish a ton of non-violent, petty offenders.
agreed. Most speeders get away with it, for example.
That's not true and we don't make room for them by releasing worse offenders who are punished less. That's not even remotely true.
well, its definitely true that we incarcerate a large number of petty offenders for long periods. Where do you say that space comes from?
It happens rarely and gets over publicized so some Americans think we have a bunch of potheads in prison for possession which is not the case.
Source?

Here's one I found:
 

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Crime increased dramatically in a number of cities after the racial reckoning and it concentrated in black neighborhoods as the police pulled back.
Who asked the police to pull back? Who's to say this isn't a covid effect?
That's well documented.
repeated as fact ad nauseum on rightie internet sites isnt "well documented".
During this period, black women had a higher murder rate than white men and white American men have a much higher murder rate than white European men. "The homicide rate among Black victims in the United States was 23.41 per 100,000. For that year, the overall national homicide rate was 6.03 per 100,000. For whites, the national homicide rate was 3.24 per 100,000. The Black homicide victimization rate was nearly four times the overall homicide victimization rate (23.41 per 100,000 compared to 6.03 per 100,000) and seven times the white homicide victimization rate (23.41 per 100,000 compared to 3.24 per 100,000). From 2019 to 2020, the Black homicide victimization rate increased by 29 percent (from 18.08 per 100,000 in 2019 to 23.41 per 100,000 in 2020). The rate of 23.41 per 100,000 in 2020 was the highest Black homicide victimization rate in the 17-year history of this study. Additional information contained in the FBI SHR data on Black homicide victimization is below."

Ok, so? People in bad neighborhoods are more likely to be victims, and black people etc are more likely to be in poor neighborhoods, that explains that right? What's the point here?
 

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Maybe. What has the reduction from felony to misdemeanor for stealing less than $1,000 in merch done in a number of cities? Has it made the lives of poor black people better? I would simply remove the criminals and imprison them. It's not a lot. Less than 1% would be fine and make cities so much safer for the 99%
I would say this has only been a problem where repeat offenders have not been treated as repeat offenders. I get why some far libs would resist doing so, but most libs would agree with increasing punishment for repeat offenses.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
It's not the weaponry, it's the attitude.

agreed. Most speeders get away with it, for example.

well, its definitely true that we incarcerate a large number of petty offenders for long periods. Where do you say that space comes from?

Source?

Here's one I found:

Correlation is not causation.

good advice.

no, it doesnt.

Depends entirely on what you define as crime.

that was tried and didnt work. Can't you see a piece doesn't fit there?

Agreed.
It's not the weaponry, it's the attitude.

agreed. Most speeders get away with it, for example.

well, its definitely true that we incarcerate a large number of petty offenders for long periods. Where do you say that space comes from?

Source?

Here's one I found:
Your source is mainly about federal prisoners. Most prisoners are in state prisons. "Of the approximately 145,000 people in federal prisons and 1,040,000 people in state prisons, less than 3.5 percent are incarcerated for a conviction related to drug possession. Even when one expands the scope beyond mere possession to all other types of drug offenses (many of which are associated with violent cartels and gangs), the proportion rises only to 18 percent." https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-myth-of-the-nonviolent-drug-offender
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
Who asked the police to pull back? Who's to say this isn't a covid effect?

repeated as fact ad nauseum on rightie internet sites isnt "well documented".

Ok, so? People in bad neighborhoods are more likely to be victims, and black people etc are more likely to be in poor neighborhoods, that explains that right? What's the point here?
Progressives did. And some DA's (Seattle, LA, Philly, Chicago etc) Covid was world wide but the crime increase wasn't. Crime rates declined in some countries. Thus, reason and logic say it wasn't Covid.

The poor, especially poor non-whites are more likely to suffer the consequences of policy preferences pushed by materially better off white progressives. That's the point. White progressives don't suffer from some policies they support. But by doing so they grant themselves absolution for our white supremacist past.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thatsbaseball

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
We have a lot of people in prison. Not enough. How many additional murders, carjackings, rapes, violent crimes etc are we going to have this year by non-incarcerated people with criminal records? That's an indication that we don't have enough people in prison
 
  • Like
Reactions: thatsbaseball

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,495
2,787
113
It's not the weaponry, it's the attitude.

agreed. Most speeders get away with it, for example.

well, its definitely true that we incarcerate a large number of petty offenders for long periods. Where do you say that space comes from?

Source?

Here's one I found:
Read closely. Some rare events are being highlighted here
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login