Economists have correctly predicted 27 out of the last 3 recessions.Bull market has been going on for a long time and at some point it’s going to correct itself. With what the Fed did the other day, it appears they’ve accepted that a recession is on the way.
Throw in this banking “crisis” (which I still think has been overblown by media and social media hysterics) and you’ve got another notch in the tally for recession fears.
Just stick to your guns. Eventually there will be a 1) Recession or 2) Bull Market. The key is don't ever change your prediction so you can always be right.Economists have correctly predicted 27 out of the last 3 recessions.
I see this argument often, that calls into question the accuracy and it puzzles me. A graph like this shows trends. Unless the people creating this graph used different criteria for different years, then this trend graph has some meaning whether you agree with how the numbers are calculated or not.I don't believe unemployment numbers. In the past 20 years, they've tweaked the way they calculate those numbers to benefit the party in power.
I'm not arguing the premise of the graph. Just throwing my 2 cents in about the numbers. I agree with the overarching point its making.I see this argument often, that calls into question the accuracy and it puzzles me. A graph like this shows trends. Unless the people creating this graph used different criteria for different years, then this trend graph has some meaning whether you agree with how the numbers are calculated or not.
Odd- I saw it initially. It was something from the 1800s it looked like and showed 3 levels of economic activity thru the years.Looks like my second graph didn't post...
The liquidity crunch at banks is real but not to the point you should see banks failing often. But it’s real enough that banks are starting to signal they will have to slow loan growth, which will almost certainly lead to a recession.Bull market has been going on for a long time and at some point it’s going to correct itself. With what the Fed did the other day, it appears they’ve accepted that a recession is on the way.
Throw in this banking “crisis” (which I still think has been overblown by media and social media hysterics) and you’ve got another notch in the tally for recession fears.
Same has they have done with inflation. They are making some change to it soon, or perhaps recently, that affects the way housing costs are calculated. This way they can make it sound better than it is.I don't believe unemployment numbers. In the past 20 years, they've tweaked the way they calculate those numbers to benefit the party in power.
This is what scares me. Instead of letting the natural cycle of the economy work itself out, both parties heavily manipulated it with massive subsidies and near zero interest rates for a long time. My fear is they've not only postponed the inevitable recession, they've juiced things up so much it's going to be worse than it would have been if they've let things play out over the last decade or so.It did last longer than it probably should have, due in part to manipulation by powers trying to let the good times roll, but here we are with the obvious fall out that anyone who is honest can say they knew it would come. Regardless of who would be in power and regardless of what was happening in the world(China v Taiwan, Russia v Ukraine, Taliban v nobody), there would have to be an economic correction from what we saw in the late teens.
If we see a recession in the coming year, that will really suck, but it will really not surprise me.
Thread Ruination = EngagedI dont look forward to all the finger pointing by simpletons on both sides who cant grasp complexity and will loudly claim this is all due to 1 thing. Meanwhile, there will be a dozen+ 1 things mentioned, which will make it all comical to anyone with perspective.
- Its because of oil prices and lack of support for giant multinationals!
- Its because of the Green Deal!
- Its because of woke policy!
- Its because illegals are flooding our border- they terk err jerbs!
- Its because the last administration forced interest rates to stay low!
- Its because people demand a livable wage to flip a burger!
- Its because the last administration printed money and sent out Trump Checks!
- Its because the current administration printed money and sent out Biden Bucks!
- Its because China released a global virus in order to make them the largest economy!
- Its because Russia invaded Ukraine and disrupted natural gas and wheat!
- Its because giant companies used supply shortages from 2-3 years ago to jack up prices!
- Its because the Fed didnt react quickly enough!
etc etc etc.
Everything is always over overcorrected to create a more immediate response so the people in power can get short term praise. Then it 17s us in the end.This is what scares me. Instead of letting the natural cycle of the economy work itself out, both parties heavily manipulated it with massive subsidies and near zero interest rates for a long time. My fear is they've not only postponed the inevitable recession, they've juiced things up so much it's going to be worse than it would have been if they've let things play out over the last decade or so.
I agree with this. All the soft landing vs. hard or crash landing talk - in my mind a recession IS a soft landing. Recessions are just a part of the economic cycle, but nobody wants it to happen on their watch. They have always been a political hot potato, but its been made worse by talk radio, 24 hour news, the internet, social media, and the low brow sky is falling rubes who eat, sleep and breath all that ****.This is what scares me. Instead of letting the natural cycle of the economy work itself out, both parties heavily manipulated it with massive subsidies and near zero interest rates for a long time. My fear is they've not only postponed the inevitable recession, they've juiced things up so much it's going to be worse than it would have been if they've let things play out over the last decade or so.
I see ESG has entered the chat.Wall Street has been heavily investing in ESG as opposed to working for their clients in a fiduciary fashion.
For sure- +1 to all this. Those in power did what they thought they needed to do to stay in power in the short term, and to hell with the repercussions down the line.This is what scares me. Instead of letting the natural cycle of the economy work itself out, both parties heavily manipulated it with massive subsidies and near zero interest rates for a long time. My fear is they've not only postponed the inevitable recession, they've juiced things up so much it's going to be worse than it would have been if they've let things play out over the last decade or so.
What of those 12 singular reasons that will be(and have been) claimed is going to ruin this thread?Thread Ruination = Engaged
Thread Ruination = ProcessingI see ESG has entered the chat.
There are two openings for every unemployed person. Lotta runway thereLayoffs have already started. The fed 17'd up and Covid amplified it.
I just hope it brings down the price of pickups. I need one bad and have been putting it off for about three years. And need two service trucks for my company. Frick $100 K for a truck with a $20 K "market adjustment".The liquidity crunch at banks is real but not to the point you should see banks failing often. But it’s real enough that banks are starting to signal they will have to slow loan growth, which will almost certainly lead to a recession.
Those openings are going away too. You're going to start seeing it in the news soon. I deal with vendors all over the country. They're all eliminating jobs, not hiring. Inflation can't die down if people are still employed and spending like drunken whores.There are two openings for every unemployed person. Lotta runway there
overrated cigars? For that money, just buy Davidoffs and you’ll be much happier.Wall Street has been heavily investing in ESG
This probably won't ever get back to where it was either. Lots of people with two income households realized they were barely breaking even on having two incomes after factoring in the cost of childcare, lunch at work, commuting, etc. Or even if the money made sense, their quality of life with both spouses working may not have made them happy.Labor participation rate is still below pre pandemic levels.
3/4 ton trucks are absolutely 17ing ridiculous and used ones are even worse.I just hope it brings down the price of pickups. I need one bad and have been putting it off for about three years. And need two service trucks for my company. Frick $100 K for a truck with a $20 K "market adjustment".
Hope you’re right. i think this would be good for families and our country.This probably won't ever get back to where it was either. Lots of people with two income households realized they were barely breaking even on having two incomes after factoring in the cost of childcare, lunch at work, commuting, etc. Or even if the money made sense, their quality of life with both spouses working may not have made them happy.
Yep. I got lucky and work at home now. Going to see more and more people working remotely and living where they want to live instead of being tied to a job in a specific location too. I'm looking at moving to Starkville now. Wife is about to go remote too. Staying home saved me almost a $1000 a month. I suspect lots of that is part of why spending hasn't fallen enough.This probably won't ever get back to where it was either. Lots of people with two income households realized they were barely breaking even on having two incomes after factoring in the cost of childcare, lunch at work, commuting, etc. Or even if the money made sense, their quality of life with both spouses working may not have made them happy.
I just hope it brings down the price of pickups. I need one bad and have been putting it off for about three years. And need two service trucks for my company. Frick $100 K for a truck with a $20 K "market adjustment
Also it means a lot of working age people are sitting on their @SS drawing a check.This probably won't ever get back to where it was either. Lots of people with two income households realized they were barely breaking even on having two incomes after factoring in the cost of childcare, lunch at work, commuting, etc. Or even if the money made sense, their quality of life with both spouses working may not have made them happy.
I sold my business at the beginning of COVID to stay home with kids because my wife made more money and had great benefits, plus she could work remotely. We soon realized that both of us working full time had us in a perpetual rat race. We were lucky to get more than a week a year of vacation/travel because of school and work commitments.Yep. I got lucky and work at home now. Going to see more and more people working remotely and living where they want to live instead of being tied to a job in a specific location too. I'm looking at moving to Starkville now. Wife is about to go remote too. Staying home saved me almost a $1000 a month. I suspect lots of that is part of why spending hasn't fallen enough.