OT: Economy - Since SPS is the best place to learn about economics. Thoughts?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PooPopsBaldHead

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2017
7,954
5,004
113
Also it means a lot of working age people are sitting on their @SS drawing a check.
Not really anymore. Early on in 2020 and 2021 that was true. That unemployment number is basically at an all time low now. That's the people drawing the check. The participation rate decline is the people that decided to retire early or focus on family.

Not sure if the welfare/"crazy check" game has increased. But I know lots of people from my circle that left the dual income rat race and are way happier with less stress in their lives.

Point being, I don't think there is a quick solution to the labor shortage. There is not a big cohort out there ready/wanting/needing to go back to work. Now you want to solve the welfare class that has existed for 50 years, we may find some people.

One issue I see though is good jobs are getting cut (tech and management) and the open jobs tend to be entry level service jobs. If that trend continues it could cause a nastier and longer lasting recession. But I don't think the Fed had the stones to let go on for too long.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TrueMaroonGrind

Boom Boom

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
1,942
1,091
113
Not really anymore. Early on in 2020 and 2021 that was true. That unemployment number is basically at an all time low now. That's the people drawing the check. The participation rate decline is the people that decided to retire early or focus on family.

Not sure if the welfare/"crazy check" game has increased. But I know lots of people from my circle that left the dual income rat race and are way happier with less stress in their lives.

Point being, I don't think there is a quick solution to the labor shortage. There is not a big cohort out there ready/wanting/needing to go back to work. Now you want to solve the welfare class that has existed for 50 years, we may find some people.

One issue I see though is good jobs are getting cut (tech and management) and the open jobs tend to be entry level service jobs. If that trend continues it could cause a nastier and longer lasting recession. But I don't think the Fed had the stones to let go on for too long.
What happened to all the peeps on here insisting that the crazy checks was what was driving low unemployment and wage gains? I thought the $15 McDs jobs were supposed to disappear with the checks?
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,084
113
What happened to all the peeps on here insisting that the crazy checks was what was driving low unemployment and wage gains? I thought the $15 McDs jobs were supposed to disappear with the checks?
I thought people were saying the government (if that’s what you are referring to by “crazy”) checks were driving the high numbers of people not going to work and thus the $15 McDs jobs. I don’t know what McDs is currently paying but the one I drive by no longer has the sign out front advertising high starting pay and I personally hired someone for $1/hr less than I could 6 months ago. Not sure if I’m agreeing with your post, refuting it, or neither.
 

peewee.sixpack

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2014
543
516
93
I thought people were saying the government (if that’s what you are referring to by “crazy”) checks were driving the high numbers of people not going to work and thus the $15 McDs jobs. I don’t know what McDs is currently paying but the one I drive by no longer has the sign out front advertising high starting pay and I personally hired someone for $1/hr less than I could 6 months ago. Not sure if I’m agreeing with your post, refuting it, or neither.

I believe they are referring to Crazy checks as people who are getting Mental Disability Checks.
 

ronpolk

Well-known member
May 6, 2009
8,119
2,609
113
I just hope it brings down the price of pickups. I need one bad and have been putting it off for about three years. And need two service trucks for my company. Frick $100 K for a truck with a $20 K "market adjustment".
No doubt truck prices are ridiculous. I hope I’m wrong about this but I don’t think either dealerships or manufacturers want that situation to change. Dealerships found operating with no inventory to be a much more profitable business environment. They essentially have people on a waiting list and as soon as the new truck hits the lot they have it sold.
 

Cantdoitsal

Well-known member
Sep 26, 2022
3,359
2,705
113
I see ESG has entered the chat.
Why shouldn't it? Over $649 billion flowed into ESG-focused funds the last year¹ as investors increasingly pushed conversations about climate change and social justice with companies and regulators alike. By the end of 2021, the massive influx of capital led to ESG funds comprising roughly 10% of worldwide fund assets.Jan 28, 2022
 

Mobile Bay

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2020
3,841
1,531
113
This probably won't ever get back to where it was either. Lots of people with two income households realized they were barely breaking even on having two incomes after factoring in the cost of childcare, lunch at work, commuting, etc. Or even if the money made sense, their quality of life with both spouses working may not have made them happy.
And a lot of older people called it a day and retired in 2020.
 

ababyatemydingo

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2008
2,921
1,538
113
No doubt truck prices are ridiculous. I hope I’m wrong about this but I don’t think either dealerships or manufacturers want that situation to change. Dealerships found operating with no inventory to be a much more profitable business environment. They essentially have people on a waiting list and as soon as the new truck hits the lot they have it sold.
Dodge lots have stayed full. Ford and Chevy artificially kept empty lots way past Covid supply chain issues. To give the illusion that there was a supply issue. Im starting to see more and more Ford lots filling up, with trucks sitting there past 60 days. Chevy is still playing the "supply is low" game, but I suspect the 2nd quarter of 2023 will change that. With interest rates continuing to edge up, and repossessions also edging up, late Q2 into mid Q3 will probably be when we see them start to come off of these ridiculous prices. I went perusing around a Ford lot just for shites and giggles and let a sales guy approach me and I asked him why they still had the huge market adjustments on the trucks. He said "oh that sticker has been on there a few months. We're starting to discount now". But by that, he meant "we're starting to sell at MSRP". I think late Q2 into mid Q3 is going to be the time to buy.
 

She Mate Me

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2008
9,641
6,187
113
This is what scares me. Instead of letting the natural cycle of the economy work itself out, both parties heavily manipulated it with massive subsidies and near zero interest rates for a long time. My fear is they've not only postponed the inevitable recession, they've juiced things up so much it's going to be worse than it would have been if they've let things play out over the last decade or so.

I believe you're wise to be scared. The Fed's sway over the global economy has been tremendous for basically 45 years. There will come a point when they can't keep the balls in the air any longer. It might be 6 months it might be 6 years, but we're going to have a depression like correction in these markets

Acknowledging it is not the same as rooting for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

thatsbaseball

Well-known member
May 29, 2007
16,605
4,080
113
What happened to all the peeps on here insisting that the crazy checks was what was driving low unemployment and wage gains? I thought the $15 McDs jobs were supposed to disappear with the checks?
The "craziest " checks I've ever seen was the insane spending on "Covid relief". I doubt that over 30-40% of that money hit it's mark . Billions and billions of dollars went to businesses and people who didn't need it or deserve it. Basically most of it went straight towards enhancing the inflation we see today.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
Also it means a lot of working age people are sitting on their @SS drawing a check.
Are they though?
If unemployment is at an all time low, then that would mean few people are sitting on their butts drawing a check...right?
Maybe I misunderstand what 'a check' refers to specifically.


Your post just seems like the typical bitter person who blames 'the lazy', whether justified or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stateu1

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,068
113
This is what scares me. Instead of letting the natural cycle of the economy work itself out, both parties heavily manipulated it with massive subsidies and near zero interest rates for a long time. My fear is they've not only postponed the inevitable recession, they've juiced things up so much it's going to be worse than it would have been if they've let things play out over the last decade or so.
Right. So is normal now = natural cycle or is normal = heavy fed manipulation? If you went more Laissez-faire do things get better? It's a mess. The good news is that our political parties have decided to focus on culture wars over economic issues.***
 

Leeshouldveflanked

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2016
11,137
4,886
113
Household debt in US has increased $122 Billion since May 2021. Average credit card interest is around %20 right now. Lots of people upside down right now.
 

PooPopsBaldHead

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2017
7,954
5,004
113
Household debt in US has increased $122 Billion since May 2021. Average credit card interest is around %20 right now. Lots of people upside down right now.
That sounds like a big number, but it's not considering there are 131 million households in the US. Adds up to $930 per household.

A better way to track debt is total household debt vs GDP and household debt service to disposable income. Both are still lower than it was pre COVID which was historically low.

Screenshot_20230323-153641.png

Screenshot_20230323-153531.png

The average household is in much better debt shape than anytime in precovid history.
 

Jacknut

Member
Sep 29, 2022
158
192
43
Unemployment may be low in some sectors, but the restaurant industry hasn't caught up at least in my personal experience. All the <25 year-olds who used to work these jobs have gone away. And I don't think they all got desk jobs.
 

ababyatemydingo

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2008
2,921
1,538
113
Are they though?
If unemployment is at an all time low, then that would mean few people are sitting on their butts drawing a check...right?
Maybe I misunderstand what 'a check' refers to specifically.


Your post just seems like the typical bitter person who blames 'the lazy', whether justified or not.
This doesn't take into consideration people who have fallen completely out of the job market. It only takes into consideration those that are drawing unemployment checks For whatever reason, there are a lot who have completely fallen out of the job market
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,068
113
Odd- I saw it initially. It was something from the 1800s it looked like and showed 3 levels of economic activity thru the years.
Oddly, it disappeared when I posted it in a separate reply. One more try here because it is irritating me...

ETA: I'm not proposing this is correct, just interesting.

1679608202248.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

horshack.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2012
9,063
5,068
113
The "craziest " checks I've ever seen was the insane spending on "Covid relief". I doubt that over 30-40% of that money hit it's mark . Billions and billions of dollars went to businesses and people who didn't need it or deserve it. Basically most of it went straight towards enhancing the inflation we see today.
Think of all the jobs it created through the need to prosecute all the people who scammed the system!***
 

BoDawg.sixpack

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2010
4,337
1,393
113
I drive an '86 Honda CRX and I eat bologna sandwiches every day. I sleep in a space underneath my parents staircase and I check SPS on my Blackberry for my daily entertainment. I bank the rest of my paycheck in various funds after those expenses. You may drive a nicer vehicle but there's a good chance my portfolio is bigger than yours.
 

paindonthurt

Well-known member
Jun 27, 2009
9,529
2,045
113
I see this argument often, that calls into question the accuracy and it puzzles me. A graph like this shows trends. Unless the people creating this graph used different criteria for different years, then this trend graph has some meaning whether you agree with how the numbers are calculated or not.
If you have 100 data points over time for unemployment numbers that were calculated differently (which is true) then dump those data points into a graph and compare it to anything, the trends might not be accurate bc they are not compared properly.
 

Dawgbite

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2011
6,224
4,635
113
And a lot of older people called it a day and retired in 2020.
Me, me, me! You young whipper snappers better not 17 social security before I get there. Some of you really need to get a second job and pay a little more taxes.
 

Mobile Bay

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2020
3,841
1,531
113
You just can't dispute this kinda common sense.


Asking that question to Milton Friedman is like a pitcher wanking up to Hank Aaron with a tee and setting the ball exactly where he wants it. The entirety of "Free to Choose" is on youtube and everybody needs to watch it.
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
48,320
11,963
113
Me, me, me! You young whipper snappers better not 17 social security before I get there. Some of you really need to get a second job and pay a little more taxes.
It's going to happen. Just a question of when and how much. Right now, looks like 20% cuts in about 9 years. I'm sure they'll do something to delay the cuts, but they're inevitable. The current model just isn't sustainable.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,466
3,379
113
This doesn't take into consideration people who have fallen completely out of the job market. It only takes into consideration those that are drawing unemployment checks For whatever reason, there are a lot who have completely fallen out of the job market
Correct, unemployment doesn't take I to account people who aren't looking to work. That's why retired 85 yearolds aren't included in unemployment numbers.

Those who have fallen completely out of the job market also aren't collecting unemployment money.
I mention this to tie it back to Lee's dumb comment.
 

dudehead

Active member
Jul 9, 2006
1,308
362
83
Bull market has been going on for a long time and at some point it’s going to correct itself. With what the Fed did the other day, it appears they’ve accepted that a recession is on the way.
Throw in this banking “crisis” (which I still think has been overblown by media and social media hysterics) and you’ve got another notch in the tally for recession fears.
Depends on how long banks are on bonds
I believe you're wise to be scared. The Fed's sway over the global economy has been tremendous for basically 45 years. There will come a point when they can't keep the balls in the air any longer. It might be 6 months it might be 6 years, but we're going to have a depression like correction in these markets

Acknowledging it is not the same as rooting for it.
I thought that back in 2009 and 2010 and they just kept the hammer down full speed ahead free money.
 

jethreauxdawg

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2010
8,665
8,084
113
Asking that question to Milton Friedman is like a pitcher wanking up to Hank Aaron with a tee and setting the ball exactly where he wants it. The entirety of "Free to Choose" is on youtube and everybody needs to watch it.
I’ve heard of people being into humiliation but that seems really messed up.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CochiseCowbell

MrKotter

Active member
Aug 22, 2012
819
350
63
That sounds like a big number, but it's not considering there are 131 million households in the US. Adds up to $930 per household.

A better way to track debt is total household debt vs GDP and household debt service to disposable income. Both are still lower than it was pre COVID which was historically low.

View attachment 321452

View attachment 321453

The average household is in much better debt shape than anytime in precovid history.
Creative way to express total BS
 

OopsICroomedmypants

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
852
1,168
93
I believe you're wise to be scared. The Fed's sway over the global economy has been tremendous for basically 45 years. There will come a point when they can't keep the balls in the air any longer. It might be 6 months it might be 6 years, but we're going to have a depression like correction in these markets

Acknowledging it is not the same as rooting for it.
exactly
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,089
9,419
113
You wouldn't understand it.
Uh Huh Sure GIF
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login