OT: Longtimefan Strike

Trojanbulldog19

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2014
9,170
4,719
113
Literally every industry has had to deal with adjusting to technology improvements and automation of some kind. These guys held everyone by the balls because they didn’t like it.
Yep learn to fix the technology or use it. Manual labor jobs change all the time. Amount electronics technicians have etc etc
 

leeinator

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2014
840
621
93
"Give Croom time"
Croom got his 5 years to gitter done. So did Rockey. That's fair in my opinion. I'm more than willing to give Lebby at least 3 years....maybe more if he can show positive improvement. We just cannot continue to fire coaches every one or two years and expect to attract a really good coach.
 

NTDawg

Well-known member
Mar 2, 2012
2,125
722
113
Yep. Automation/innovation is the backbone of capitalism. Businesses/industries that innovate experience rapid growth, hire new employees, and lift entire economic sectors/regions. Businesses/industries that try to protect antiquated methods of operation are dead without even knowing it and drag down the economic stakeholders that rely on them down with them.. See the rust belt.

There's no difference in what these morons are arguing for than the wagon makers in the 19th century trying to prevent railroads or automobiles from taking over.

And for the "I'm GonNa SeNd my kIdS To tRaDe sChOoL" folks... Think it through. I'm more in favor of sending mine to engineering school to develop the technology that replaces your kid's job in 20 years.
On the other hand AI will never wire your house, install/fix your ac, be a plumber etc but AI will diagnosis illness, write legal briefs, and design technology. When AI was first being developed I thought it might do away with blue collar jobs but now I think that white collar jobs will be more impacted by AI.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
23,033
11,208
113
On the other hand AI will never wire your house, install/fix your ac, be a plumber etc but AI will diagnosis illness, write legal briefs, and design technology. When AI was first being developed I thought it might do away with blue collar jobs but now I think that white collar jobs will be more impacted by AI.
As much as John Deere wants to tout it, it’s not replacing tractor drivers either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NTDawg

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,735
3,647
113
Well, since they kicked the canned on the road a bit, I do hope that the dock workers are able to negotiate pay that is incentivizing and competitive both now and in the future, while also accepting the reality that the pay they are demanding is unrealistic.

And I hope they are able to create an agreement that details a timeline for implementing automation and details workers protection levels.
Including cross training and guarantees that a % of current workers will then be employed to maintain/repair equipment would be good.
5 years- X max changes to automation and Z max possible reduction in staff.
10 years- X max changes to automation and Z max possible reduction in staff.
 

The Cooterpoot

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
4,538
7,513
113
Be Back Later Break Time GIF by ConEquip Parts
 
  • Like
Reactions: PooPopsBaldHead

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
15,227
6,482
113
while also accepting the reality that the pay they are demanding is unrealistic.
First you can't get it if you don't ask for it. Second, I think they know it's unrealistic, but you can never go back up the mountain in negotiations, but you can always come down. In any negotiation you start really high even if you know it will not happen.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,753
113
As much as John Deere wants to tout it, it’s not replacing tractor drivers either.
Surely they're close though, right? I mean, maybe not close as in a year or two because the risk of having a large, million dollar piece of equipment only subject to remote control if something goes wrong is a hard risk to swallow and that last few percent of improvement is going to be hard to achieve, but surely they can already run a tractor for a long time autonomously at this point?
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,735
3,647
113
First you can't get it if you don't ask for it. Second, I think they know it's unrealistic, but you can never go back up the mountain in negotiations, but you can always come down. In any negotiation you start really high even if you know it will not happen.
100% agree.
So much has been made about the high pay demand, but to your point, you can’t ever ask for more after you offer up that initial number.
with that said, I can see how some Goodwill could be lost by demanding more. But I am sure the union took that into account… It’s not like this is their first time negotiating a contract or dealing with PR.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,753
113
Union boss knows there is an election in 30 days.
He knew that before the strike. The question is what kind of promises he received from Kamala's team as far as support in order to delay the strike. I might would have deal with it now than risk dealing with it next quarter when they have an administration that made promises to them and isn't facing any reelection for almost four years.

Plus I think at this point we should really be able to break the union and mob ties. Maybe not at every local, but at least at the 17ing national level and them 17ing things up might would be the impetus to get that done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbaydog

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
15,227
6,482
113
100% agree.
So much has been made about the high pay demand, but to your point, you can’t ever ask for more after you offer up that initial number.
with that said, I can see how some Goodwill could be lost by demanding more. But I am sure the union took that into account… It’s not like this is their first time negotiating a contract or dealing with PR.
I think the biggest hold up will be automation. They might get protection in this contract but when the next collective bargaining comes up, they may not. Technolgy is great and more efficient, but it will cost jobs eventually.

I am glad I can retire at any time with my define benefit plan because I could be replaced by AI. Once they solve the power that it takes to run it issue and it cost less than paying a human. My job could be gone. I only need about three more years. I think I can get there first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstateglfr

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,716
8,228
113
On the other hand AI will never wire your house, install/fix your ac, be a plumber etc but AI will diagnosis illness, write legal briefs, and design technology. When AI was first being developed I thought it might do away with blue collar jobs but now I think that white collar jobs will be more impacted by AI.
Possible, but without white collar jobs, you may not have a market for electricans/HVAC/plumbers because no one can afford them. Who knows.

I honestly don't think jobs will go away overall, I think society will just get faster and move closer to its impending doom. But hey I did see a video where some folks are trying to dump all our trash in the Mariana Trench, which could hold enough to last us like 2,000 years.

Guess we need to pay these longshoremen
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,753
113
100% agree.
So much has been made about the high pay demand, but to your point, you can’t ever ask for more after you offer up that initial number.
with that said, I can see how some Goodwill could be lost by demanding more. But I am sure the union took that into account… It’s not like this is their first time negotiating a contract or dealing with PR.
I dont' know. I think they had too much influence from people in areas used to the mob dictating their national strategy. The outrageous pay hikes weren't that big of a deal; a little tone deaf, but depending on the raises they've gotten during the last 4 years of inflation, and considering it's over 6 years, it's very possible they needed to start at at least a 50% payraise to leave them any negotiating room; if the union leadership needs to make outrageous demands to satisfy their voters, whatever. But the fact that they let their national head go on air with his mobster tactics makes me think they weren't taking basic things into account, like how much goodwill a 77% initial ask would cost them.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
17,358
15,209
113
Well, since they kicked the canned on the road a bit, I do hope that the dock workers are able to negotiate pay that is incentivizing and competitive both now and in the future, while also accepting the reality that the pay they are demanding is unrealistic.

And I hope they are able to create an agreement that details a timeline for implementing automation and details workers protection levels.
Including cross training and guarantees that a % of current workers will then be employed to maintain/repair equipment would be good.
5 years- X max changes to automation and Z max possible reduction in staff.
10 years- X max changes to automation and Z max possible reduction in staff.
Fact check: The average dock worker salary today is 120k and many of them make up to 200k annually.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,464
2,726
113
The jobs are more important than these workers. We either have efficiency at ports using automation or we protect people, and not just jobs, and make Americans pay more for a host of products to keep some highly paid, politically powerful people employed. Self-checkout at stores works fine for me.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,716
8,228
113
The jobs are more important than these workers. We either have efficiency at ports using automation or we protect people, and not just jobs, and make Americans pay more for a host of products to keep some highly paid, politically powerful people employed. Self-checkout at stores works fine for me.
Most likely we'll have a temporary hike in prices, to cover the larger salaries and investment in automation, then it eventually comes down and all these guys either adapt or hit the road. Their jobs will get easier but also much less valuable.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
Yeah, asking for better pay and asking to protect jobs from automation are totally understandable from an employee's perspective.
...the details though?...those are pretty dang hig
I thought libs were all about progress?

Not automating will eventually be terrible for the USA and its citizens if everyone else is automating. And they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PooPopsBaldHead

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,716
8,228
113
I thought libs were all about progress?

Not automating will eventually be terrible for the USA and its citizens if everyone else is automating. And they are.
At this point you just need to realize glfr generally just takes the opposite stance of everything a conservative posts here, even if he may agree somewhat, basically to be argumentative. Realizing this will head off the urge to respond to him and create 500 page-long threads.

It's similar to dealing with......you.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,735
3,647
113
I thought libs were all about progress?

Not automating will eventually be terrible for the USA and its citizens if everyone else is automating. And they are.
1- 'progressive' as a political term is not the same as blindly supporting any and all technological automation.
You know this- don't be obtuse.

2- I flat out state, in this thread, that I think the union should agree to automation in stages. This makes the whole point of your post totally pointless.
 

Podgy

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2022
2,464
2,726
113
The union turned down a 50% pay raise and got a 62% pay raise on a 6-year contract. Winning in our system of regulated capitalism.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,735
3,647
113
Fact check: The average dock worker salary today is 120k and many of them make up to 200k annually.
Clarification check: Is that average pay on a per 40hr week basis, or is it more?
If I worked 80 hours every week with 1.5x OT, I would be scrooge mcducking it too.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
17,358
15,209
113
Clarification check: Is that average pay on a per 40hr week basis, or is it more?
If I worked 80 hours every week with 1.5x OT, I would be scrooge mcducking it too.
Base salary range is 80k to 140k at regular time and up to 200k with OT. Many work OT because they want to and fought for that right in previous labor negotiations.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
23,033
11,208
113
Surely they're close though, right? I mean, maybe not close as in a year or two because the risk of having a large, million dollar piece of equipment only subject to remote control if something goes wrong is a hard risk to swallow and that last few percent of improvement is going to be hard to achieve, but surely they can already run a tractor for a long time autonomously at this point?
An autonomous tractor can do remedial tasks but even something like simply plowing or disking a field would be a lot for it. And I won’t go into great detail but there’s so many things you need to have human eyes on that it simply can’t do and for it to overcome a human driver the disk or implement would have to have a million sensors on it.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,735
3,647
113
Base salary range is 80k to 140k at regular time and up to 200k with OT. Many work OT because they want to and fought for that right in previous labor negotiations.
Pay for longshoremen is based on their years of experience. Under the ILA's former contract with USMX, which expired on Monday, starting pay for dockworkers was $20 per hour. That rose to $24.75 per hour after two years on the job and to $31.90 after three years, topping out at $39 for workers with at least six years of service.

Are the numbers above incorrect?
The numbers cited in the article show full time pay ranges from $41,600 to $81,820.
You are saying the base pay is the same as what the article says they top out at.
If you have a reference for correct numbers, post it up. That'd be interesting to see why reports have such different pay numbers.
 

johnson86-1

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
12,505
2,753
113


Are the numbers above incorrect?
The numbers cited in the article show full time pay ranges from $41,600 to $81,820.
You are saying the base pay is the same as what the article says they top out at.
If you have a reference for correct numbers, post it up. That'd be interesting to see why reports have such different pay numbers.
Just a complete guess but I suspect you have some local unions in high priced areas that have negotiated a payrate that is some multiple of the national rate. Union members are places like Gulfport and Mobile probably get the nationally rate. Workers in major ports located in high cost of living areas in the northeast probably get more, and I'm guessing those $80k to $140k numbers are for those types of ports, probably the single highest paying port. No knowledge, I'm just assuming workers in Mobile aren't working on the same pay scale as workers in New York.

That, or it was just a game of telephone where the $80k to $140k after overtime in one article got turned into base pay in another, and then somebody wagged an overtime amount on top of that.
 

Drebin

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
17,358
15,209
113


Are the numbers above incorrect?
The numbers cited in the article show full time pay ranges from $41,600 to $81,820.
You are saying the base pay is the same as what the article says they top out at.
If you have a reference for correct numbers, post it up. That'd be interesting to see why reports have such different pay numbers.
I'm citing what I heard in a news story of CNN of all places. The hourly rate is much higher than you cite for the union workers - north of 40/hr is their minimum pay.
 

mstateglfr

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2008
13,735
3,647
113
I'm citing what I heard in a news story of CNN of all places. The hourly rate is much higher than you cite for the union workers - north of 40/hr is their minimum pay.

Everything I have read refers to ILA workers...who are the Union workers that went on strike. Documentation shows the ILA payscale. ILA spokespeople have cited the same payscale.
Below are a couple other examples.

Again- if you have actual info that shows the ILA payscale cited in articles and by ILA spokespeople is wrong, then post it.
If you dont, then at what point will you accept that maybe your fact check isnt a fact? Will the 2 examples below be enough? Do you need 4 more after that? Will you never say that your fact check was both incorrect and misleading(due to, you know, overtime needing to exist to reach the cited numbers)?

I am all for accuracy in reporting and accuracy in economic narratives like worker strikes, so I would genuinely appreciate legitimate info that supports your fact check claim.


One of the key reasons behind the current strike is the wage disparity between East Coast dockworkers and their West Coast counterparts. ILA workers earn significantly less. According to the contract that expired on Monday, ILA dockworkers started at $20 per hour, with pay rising to $24.75 after two years, $31.90 after three, and capping at $39 for those with at least six years on the job.

Before the strike, Johnnie Dixon, president of the Fort Lauderdale chapter of the ILA, told CBS News Miami that the union's demands are justified given the soaring prices consumers have faced.
"Our members top out at $39 (per hour).
We are looking for a 77%, close to 77% increase over the next seven years. When you look at the cost of inflation that's more than reasonable," he said at the time.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
1- 'progressive' as a political term is not the same as blindly supporting any and all technological automation.
You know this- don't be obtuse.

2- I flat out state, in this thread, that I think the union should agree to automation in stages. This makes the whole point of your post totally pointless.
Yeah i try to read as few of your posts as possible.
 

paindonthurt17

Active member
Jul 11, 2024
635
443
63
At this point you just need to realize glfr generally just takes the opposite stance of everything a conservative posts here, even if he may agree somewhat, basically to be argumentative. Realizing this will head off the urge to respond to him and create 500 page-long threads.

It's similar to dealing with......you.
I learned from the best, goat. You.

And you are so dumb you don't realize you just did what you said I shouldn't do.
 

IBleedMaroonDawg

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2007
23,812
8,027
113
I'm citing what I heard in a news story of CNN of all places. The hourly rate is much higher than you cite for the union workers - north of 40/hr is their minimum pay.

No matter the rate, I strongly feel I know who will pay for it. I wonder how close to the wall we are that we're running toward.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login