That is the appropriate responseI don’t really know what to say to that.
That is the appropriate responseI don’t really know what to say to that.
What alex jones SAID is no different than people saying 9/11 was fake. A few words might be different but the gist is exactly the same. Do you know what gist means?No I don't think people who say those things should be sued into oblivion.
I directly answered your question.
So now please directly answer mine.
Do you think what Alex Jones was sued for and made a career off of is equal to just saying 9/11 was an inside job or the moon landing was faked?
I don't like alex jones. But two things can be true at once.You don’t have to like any of the cable news networks, but none of them are even on the same planet as this A hole
ETA: I just realized I referred to them as cable news networks.
View attachment 691416
The news does it every day. They just get away with it b/c they say things like "allegedly".The lawsuit was for defamation. He made direct comments about the families that caused harm and put them in danger. He also doubled down on it multiple times. You can’t just say lies about people that harm them and there not be consequences.
The people who claim 9/11 of the moon landing was fake are just idiots.
You rarely go back and forth. You rarely say anything definitive b/c you know you'll get trapped in it.You criticized me and said I am unsupportive of 1A because I think it was good that Alex Jones lost his court case and went bankrupt.
given that...
...do you think Alex Jones should have won his case against Sandy Hook families and continued on?
Answer that first. Again, in a discussion there is back and forth. I posted, you responded with criticism, I asked a question, and you have since I gored the question and asked multiple questions.
Or my favorite, they cite “anonymous sources.”They just get away with it b/c they say things like "allegedly".
And glfr laps it upOr my favorite, they cite “anonymous sources.”
Oh 17 no. It's not even remotely similar.What alex jones SAID is no different than people saying 9/11 was fake. A few words might be different but the gist is exactly the same. Do you know what gist means?
Alex jones didn't make a career off of Sandy Hook. He made a career off of conspiracy theories. Sandy Hook was part of that career but a very small part in the grand scheme of his 20 some odd years of doing his thing
It is similar. I know thats hard to admit.Oh 17 no. It's not even remotely similar.
9/11 truther nut jobs didn't encourage their followers/listeners to go harass the families of the victims and prove it was fake. Nobody watched a jet fuel doesn't melt steel video and then went to dig up a grave. Nobody watched a Bush knew video then stalked and harassed a fireman's widow to prove that she really never had a husband and was a paid actor. That worthless piece of garbage encouraged his listeners to seek out and confront parents of murdered elementary school kids and made money off it. He's lucky it was only civil penalties.
Cute. Like always you stray from your argument with some vague and dumb.from 29 years ago...
View attachment 691723
Let’s Occam’s Razor your hypothesis…Again, 2 things can be true at once.
1. Alex Jones sucks
2. He shouldn't have to pay $1.5 billion
I didnt stray from my argument just because I posted a Calvin and Hobbes strip that is on point for where this thread has gone.Cute. Like always you stray from your argument with some vague and dumb.
Once again, your original reply implied that Jones was just one small part of a much bigger problem and that conspiracy theorists need to have their lives ruined and deplatformed. What we have learned over the last few years are the things that have been labeled disinformation or conspiracy theories by the Old Media wind up being proven to be 100% correct. For example, if not for New Media, we would have never learned of the worst environmental disaster since the passage of the Clean Air Act in East Palestine, OH since legacy media intentionally chose to ignore it.I didnt stray from my argument just because I posted a Calvin and Hobbes strip that is on point for where this thread has gone.
To get back to what BTO was ignorantly chastising me for...
Once again- unprotected defamation is real. The first word in that phrase means it is not protected by a 1A claim. Alex Jones chose to not even try to defend himself in court- he straight up just didnt submit required documents and lost. He gave up the opportunity to even claim 1A protected him.
BTO claimed my comment that more people who knowingly spread dangerous lies and conspiracy theories that hurt others means I am anti-1A.
That is incorrect because I support the concept of 1A and firmly believe it needs to be respected.
What Alex Jones was not a 1A issue. 1A has limits and unprotected defamation is one such limit.
- I did not imply conspiracy theorists need to have their lives ruined. I said that dangerous conspiracy theorists need to be reduced.Once again, your original reply implied that Jones was just one small part of a much bigger problem and that conspiracy theorists need to have their lives ruined and deplatformed. What we have learned over the last few years are the things that have been labeled disinformation or conspiracy theories by the Old Media wind up being proven to be 100% correct. For example, if not for New Media, we would have never learned of the worst environmental disaster since the passage of the Clean Air Act in East Palestine, OH since legacy media intentionally chose to ignore it.
There is no specific platform that I think needs to go.There is no possible way for one person or entity to decide what is or not disinformation and what is fact. Censorship causes disinformation to flourish. I am simply trying to figure out what platform and people you think need to be deplatformed since you imply it is much, much bigger than just Alex Jones. It is almost like you are intentionally trying to deflect and being noncommittal, which is totally unlike you.**
Kind of petty from a group whose children were all to recently mass murdered in a school setting. By no means am I urging sympathy just really stating my opinion.
Kind of petty from a group whose children were all to recently mass murdered in a school setting. By no means am I urging sympathy just really stating my opinion.
What you wrote sounds like one big conspiracy theory. None of that ever happened.My post was said I am happy that a dangerous liar is bankrupt and deplatformed.
My post also said there are many more dangerous liars to go before disinformation and harmful lies are reduced.
You then criticize my post because it is not supportive of 1A.
Given this...do you think Alex Jones should have won his case against Sandy Hook families and continued on?
- If you do think that...well 17 thats bonkers.
- If you dont think that...then dont sarcastically respond in a way that makes it seem like you support Jones' legal position.
Keep in mind that Jones gave up any attempt at a 1A argument because he chose to not submit documents he was required to submit. Further, unprotected defamation is a very real thing. My comment about reducing dangerous conspiracy theories and dangerous hate was referring to issues of unprotected defamation.