OT: thoughts on Dan Lanning and ending to the Oregon/OSU game?

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,100
12,113
113
Didn't see it live, but it's generating a lot of discussion.

With OSU trailing 32-31, and a 3rd and 25 from the Oregon 43 and 10 seconds left in the game, Lanning intentionally put a 12th man on the field to get an extra defender for a critical play, as OSU only needed around 10 yards to call a TO and kick the winning field goal. With the extra defender, the play resulted in an incomplete pass that took 4 seconds off the clock and gave OSU 5 yards. Lanning traded 4 seconds for 5 yards. On the next play, the OSU QB ran the ball into FG range but time expired. With that 4 seconds, they would have had time to call TO and attempt a game-winning FG. Lanning has since confirmed it was inentional.

What's your take? Cheap way to get a win? Genius move? Both?

As it is, OSU"s clock management wasn't great down the stretch. Day noticed the extra man on the field and admits they could have saved time by spiking the ball and taking the 5 yards, but says there were men open so the play was there to be made.

 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
10,390
27,034
113
Didn't see it live, but it's generating a lot of discussion.

With OSU trailing 32-31, and a 3rd and 25 from the Oregon 43 and 10 seconds left in the game, Lanning intentionally put a 12th man on the field to get an extra defender for a critical play, as OSU only needed around 10 yards to call a TO and kick the winning field goal. With the extra defender, the play resulted in an incomplete pass that took 4 seconds off the clock and gave OSU 5 yards. Lanning traded 4 seconds for 5 yards. On the next play, the OSU QB ran the ball into FG range but time expired. With that 4 seconds, they would have had time to call TO and attempt a game-winning FG. Lanning has since confirmed it was inentional.

What's your take? Cheap way to get a win? Genius move? Both?

As it is, OSU"s clock management wasn't great down the stretch. Day noticed the extra man on the field and admits they could have saved time by spiking the ball and taking the 5 yards, but says there were men open so the play was there to be made.


Genius. Not cheap at all.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,100
12,113
113
NCAA is already taking a look at it. Most assume there will be a rule change where no time comes off the clock.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,541
3,057
113
NCAA is already taking a look at it. Most assume there will be a rule change where no time comes off the clock.

That would be weird. How would you differentiate between intentional moves, like he made, and just regular fouls?

Defensive holding? No time off clock. Pass interference? No time off clock.

Could really change the 2 minute offense.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,100
12,113
113
That would be weird. How would you differentiate between intentional moves, like he made, and just regular fouls?

Defensive holding? No time off clock. Pass interference? No time off clock.

Could really change the 2 minute offense.

Yeah, not sure how it would work.

They implemented the 10-second runoff for kind of the opposite situation: teams committing penalties to intentionally stop the clock at the end of halves.
 

Piscis

Active member
Aug 31, 2024
523
469
63
That would be weird. How would you differentiate between intentional moves, like he made, and just regular fouls?

Defensive holding? No time off clock. Pass interference? No time off clock.

Could really change the 2 minute offense.
I don't see how they can tell if a penalty is intentional.
 

PrestonyteParrot

Well-known member
May 28, 2024
1,365
1,340
113
That would be weird. How would you differentiate between intentional moves, like he made, and just regular fouls?

Defensive holding? No time off clock. Pass interference? No time off clock.

Could really change the 2 minute offense.
Yea, kinda like fake injuries, right.
But the NCAA doesn't want to address either one more than likely.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

Guy in the Back

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
436
501
93
It sucks because it undermines the sanctity of the game. But, I don’t necessarily have a problem with it. He broke a rule, got penalized, but played it to his advantage. Pretty smart.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,541
3,057
113
I'm going off memory, but there was a coach many years ago who didn't want to punt. So he told his offense to false start over and over. They kept getting penalties, but the clock kept moving.

Can't remember if it was college or NFL, and I'm sure they changed the rule by now, but I remember saying "well, it's scummy, but it's in the rule book"
 

USCEE82

Active member
Feb 17, 2024
620
484
63
I'm going off memory, but there was a coach many years ago who didn't want to punt. So he told his offense to false start over and over. They kept getting penalties, but the clock kept moving.

Can't remember if it was college or NFL, and I'm sure they changed the rule by now, but I remember saying "well, it's scummy, but it's in the rule book"
Hold on. The clock stops on a penalty.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,541
3,057
113
Hold on. The clock stops on a penalty.

It does now, you're right. I am remembering this from a long time ago. I'll try to find it later when I have more time.

Maybe I'm missing remembering, it's happened.

When I did a quick search, all I found was articles about this Oregon maneuver.
 

Cackmandu

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2022
843
601
93
I'm going off memory, but there was a coach many years ago who didn't want to punt. So he told his offense to false start over and over. They kept getting penalties, but the clock kept moving.

Can't remember if it was college or NFL, and I'm sure they changed the rule by now, but I remember saying "well, it's scummy, but it's in the rule book"
I've always wondered why that isn't done more! I mean you do get penalized unlike flopping which is basically a gifted timeout!
 

Guy in the Back

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
436
501
93
Sometimes folks find loopholes no one else noticed, cares to look for, or though it went against the spirit of the game.

One of the biggest incident like this I saw happened in NASCAR with Jeff Burton and Frankie Stoddard in the All-Star race. The rule stated everyone had to make a stop. Burton’s pit stall was right at the finish line. He ran the race and stopped on the last lap. All he had to do was pull out of his stall and cross the line. They changed that rule right after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

hillna2

Member
Feb 2, 2022
126
145
43
I would also add that it feels like the DPI penalty in college football too. If you're getting beat deep, why not tackle the guy, it's only a 15 yard penalty vs whatever the gain is or a possible TD? I think that one should be looked at by the NCAA before this.
 

PrestonyteParrot

Well-known member
May 28, 2024
1,365
1,340
113
I would also add that it feels like the DPI penalty in college football too. If you're getting beat deep, why not tackle the guy, it's only a 15 yard penalty vs whatever the gain is or a possible TD? I think that one should be looked at by the NCAA before this.
Agree, I always hated this as a smart move by the defender. He got beat and should pay the price.
Spot foul would make the penalty less beneficial for the defender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hillna2

FootballLVR

Member
Sep 25, 2023
395
237
43
I think it's genius. It's in the rule book. They could change the rule but I like that people are thinking about ways to get things done within the rules.
 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
10,390
27,034
113
Agree, I always hated this as a smart move by the defender. He got beat and should pay the price.
Spot foul would make the penalty less beneficial for the defender.
Could you imagine college refs trying to call DPI and giving a team 35 or 40 yards (or more)? College officiating is bad enough now.
 

hillna2

Member
Feb 2, 2022
126
145
43
Could you imagine college refs trying to call DPI and giving a team 35 or 40 yards (or more)? College officiating is bad enough now.
It's literally the rule in the NFL. Just put the ball at where the penalty happened. Seems pretty straightforward to me...
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,100
12,113
113
I think it's genius. It's in the rule book. They could change the rule but I like that people are thinking about ways to get things done within the rules.

I think it was very smart and heady but also kind of a cheap way to get a win. All's fair in love and war, though.

As I said in the OP, though, Day saw the extra man on the field and had the chance to call for a spike and save time, but they opted to pass the ball.
 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
10,390
27,034
113
It's literally the rule in the NFL. Just put the ball at where the penalty happened. Seems pretty straightforward to me...
I know it's the NFL rule. But college refs suck. Giving them the power to flip a field is a bad idea.
 

PrestonyteParrot

Well-known member
May 28, 2024
1,365
1,340
113
Could you imagine college refs trying to call DPI and giving a team 35 or 40 yards (or more)? College officiating is bad enough now.
Rewarding the defender for grabbing a receiver who has him beat for a TD is worse.
I agree college officials are impacting the game too much but knowing where the PI occurred does not require a calculator.
 

will110

Joined Aug 17, 2018
Jan 20, 2022
10,390
27,034
113
Rewarding the defender for grabbing a receiver who has him beat for a TD is worse.
I agree college officials are impacting the game too much but knowing where the PI occurred does not require a calculator.
My concern is with them correctly calling PI.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,100
12,113
113
Rewarding the defender for grabbing a receiver who has him beat for a TD is worse.
I agree college officials are impacting the game too much but knowing where the PI occurred does not require a calculator.

I know it's the NFL rule. But college refs suck. Giving them the power to flip a field is a bad idea.

My concern is with them correctly calling PI.

All are true. It is a cheap way for a defender to get off the hook for a big gain. However, as bad as officiating has been, making a spot foul could be devastating. I like the idea of a spot foul but only if you have competent refs making the call. OR...

Allow penalties to be reviewable. It should take 5 seconds, max.
 
  • Like
Reactions: will110

Gradstudent

Joined Feb 11, 2006
Feb 2, 2022
1,126
1,715
113
Any else feel like if we tried that it would backfire and the opposing team would score against our 12 guys and win the game outright? :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,100
12,113
113
Any else feel like if we tried that it would backfire and the opposing team would score against our 12 guys and win the game outright? :)

I have no doubt if we tried this, somehow, their top receiver would end up totally uncovered 30 yards down field for a walk-in TD.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login