Satterfields offense is well known for being very complicated. He shows you how smart he is with all the complex schemes. So what if players are so confused by it that we get 50 yards in a half
Not sure where we get the remaining 15 yards to get to 50Satterfields offense is well known for being very complicated. He shows you how smart he is with all the complex schemes. So what if players are so confused by it that we get 50 yards in a half
from a Satterfield play that will take 6 sentences to callNot sure where we get the remaining 15 yards to get to 50![]()
But completely predictable. Story of CG football > Beat teams we have no business beating and lose to teams we have no business losing to.Totally unprepared. Unacceptable.
O line IS this bad, so is SatterfieldHow is the offensive line this bad??? They aren’t physically this bad, its mental. They’re confused. This is on the OC
Worst $h!t show I ever seen!!!!Satterfields offense is well known for being very complicated. He shows you how smart he is with all the complex schemes. So what if players are so confused by it that we get 50 yards in a half
Agreed, and Beamer better realize that accountability has no friends! OC and OL coaches must go!!!!O line IS this bad, so is Satterfield
Satterfields offense is well known for being very complicated. He shows you how smart he is with all the complex schemes. So what if players are so confused by it that we get 50 yards in a half
203 total yards. That's 126 yards below what Missouri is averaging.
No adjectives are adequate to describe this offense.
Did you know that we scored less against Missouri than every single team on their schedule?
That includes vandy and the ooc patsies. (Including Louisiana Tech and the Abeline Christian Wildcats)
Complicated to learn if you run it……easy to learn for the other side’s defense. 0 motion, 0 formation variance, 0 excitement, 0 confusion for the other teamI keep hearing how his offense is "complicated", but I think people are misusing the term. The word they are looking for is "terrible".
Complicated to learn if you run it……easy to learn for the other side’s defense. 0 motion, 0 formation variance, 0 excitement, 0 confusion for the other team
I have to go back to Woods or Scott to see anything that resembled how we played today. We salvaged a very mediocre team's season for them. I talked to some of their fans on the way out; they couldn't believe that was their team down there beating us. They were truly expecting to lose this afternoon.Worst $h!t show I ever seen!!!!![]()
satterfield has to go
Satt should be the first firing on the Beamer era. The only question is WHEN? Why wait until off season?
I truly see no other option at this point. It would be sheer madness to bring him back.
And yet we have a poster that is defending him aggressively, week after week. I worry about what our history has done to some of our fans.
Nope, I recall we played Missouri in a lesser bowl Game (Birmingham Bowl?) back in Spurriers fun and gun days. Carolina raced out to a 29 point lead in the first half. Then Missouri caught fire in the 2nd half with a QB named Chace Daniels and came back to win 32-29. Now that was heartbreaking.its not like Mizzou has ever feared us for some reason.I have to go back to Woods or Scott to see anything that resembled how we played today. We salvaged a very mediocre team's season for them. I talked to some of their fans on the way out; they couldn't believe that was their team down there beating us. They were truly expecting to lose this afternoon.
I'm saying their current fans, having viewed the performance of their current team up to yesterday, did not expect to come to Columbia and win. One of them told me, "That's not Mizzou down there."Nope, I recall we played Missouri in a lesser bowl Game (Birmingham Bowl?) back in Spurriers fun and gun days. Carolina raced out to a 29 point lead in the first half. Then Missouri caught fire in the 2nd half with a QB named Chace Daniels and came back to win 32-29. Now that was heartbreaking.its not like Mizzou has ever feared us for some reason.
The best game was the bowl where we ran an offense suited for our players.Beamer's got to see this objectively. Our offense has really made no progress through 21 games. Where are we better on offense than we were? If we're fortunate enough to beat Vandy, we'll have patched together 6 wins, which is the same record we mustered last year when we had to start a coach at QB. This offense is just dead in the water.
Give it a long fancy name and it will workfrom a Satterfield play that will take 6 sentences to call
It’s so complicated that he doesn’t understand it.Satterfields offense is well known for being very complicated. He shows you how smart he is with all the complex schemes. So what if players are so confused by it that we get 50 yards in a half
That conceited *** will never admit to making a mistake. He walked off the field blaming the players.What has to be obvious to Beamer is that our offense is not good enough to win us any games. Without big special teams plays or big defensive plays/scores, we lose to UK and A&M. Obviously, tonight, we got nothing big on special teams or D and we lost. That performance tonight (what I saw of it, and it didn't appear to improve) was a product he should be ashamed of. If Satterfield had any dignity, he'd resign tonight. Yeah, Mizzou's D is good, but it's not THAT good.
The bowl game performance and the addition of Rattler gave me hope. As others have posted we would not have won 5 without scores by special tesms and defense. I simply cannot wrap my head around how pathetic our offense has been with the talent that we have, especially this far into the season. Something is really wrong and correcting it starts at the top.The best game was the bowl where we ran an offense suited for our players.