Penalty: Defense offside OR offense hands to head?

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
I’ve seen this several times in the past, but I never hear the argument that this actually should be a 15 yard penalty if anything on the offensive for hands to the head. Thoughts?

 
  • Haha
Reactions: ronpolk and patdog

pseudonym

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2022
2,939
4,287
113
Movement by the offensive line with a defender in the neutral zone is automatically offside on the defense. Usually you see the offensive lineman standup when a defender enters the neutral zone to induce the whistle.

I don’t have a problem with the slap in this case. It’s cooler and more disrespectful than just standing up or pointing.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: mcdawg22 and Dawgg

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
Movement by the offensive line with a defender in the neutral zone is automatically offside on the defense. Usually you see the offensive lineman standup when a defender enters the neutral zone to induce the whistle.

I don’t have a problem with the slap in this case. It’s cooler and more disrespectful than just standing up or pointing.
I get that, but how by rules definition is this not hands to the head penalty? Especially in this day and age.
 

Ozarkdawg

Active member
Apr 1, 2017
585
375
63
I get that, but how by rules definition is this not hands to the head penalty? Especially in this day and age.
It is not forcible contact. It doesn't involve any touching, pushing, twisting of the facemask.
If you think about it, there is a lot more contact to helmets during tackles that is not considered targeting for the same reasons.
 

Hugh's Burner Phone

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2017
4,418
3,663
113
I have still yet to figure out why a RB can stiff arm a defender in the facemask and that isn't a penalty, but if the defender's pinky barely grazes the RB's facemask then it's 15 yards. Same thing on why can they lower their head and lead with the crown of the helmet and it not be targeting.
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
It is not forcible contact. It doesn't involve any touching, pushing, twisting of the facemask.
If you think about it, there is a lot more contact to helmets during tackles that is not considered targeting for the same reasons.
I’ve seen plenty of pass rushers called for less or the same on a quarterback. Have you not?
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
Because it’s not a live ball.
Personal foul penalties are called all the time after the play when it’s not a live ball situation. Before the play after the play, both are not a live ball.
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,585
3,564
113
Personal foul penalties are called all the time after the play when it’s not a live ball situation. Before the play after the play, both are not a live ball.
Yes. Thats unsportsmanlike conduct. I thought you were asking about hands to the face. Doubtful this is ever going to be unsportsmanlike conduct. It’s not bad at all.
 

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
Yes. Thats unsportsmanlike conduct. I thought you were asking about hands to the face. Doubtful this is ever going to be unsportsmanlike conduct. It’s not bad at all.
Again this begs the same question, slapping someone in the head is always unsportsmanlike conduct and a personal foul in every other football related instance. I get touching them on the shoulder pad, but this is something different, according to the rules.
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,585
3,564
113
Again this begs the same question, slapping someone in the head is always unsportsmanlike conduct and a personal foul in every other football related instance. I get touching them on the shoulder pad, but this is something different, according to the rules.
Meh. Now you are getting into the subjectivity of it. It looks like nothing to me. But yes someone could call it UC
 
  • Like
Reactions: bulldoghair

Ozarkdawg

Active member
Apr 1, 2017
585
375
63
I’ve seen plenty of pass rushers called for less or the same on a quarterback. Have you not?
I’ve seen plenty of pass rushers called for less or the same on a quarterback. Have you not?
You answered your own question. It wasn't a quarterback.
Had he shoved him so hard in the head that he knocked the guy back or down, it probably gets called but not a tap in that situation.

Also, I've seen opposing coaches shove the other team's quarterback and not get a flag. Have you not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CochiseCowbell

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
You answered your own question. It wasn't a quarterback.
Had he shoved him so hard in the head that he knocked the guy back or down, it probably gets called but not a tap in that situation.

Also, I've seen opposing coaches shove the other team's quarterback and not get a flag. Have you not?
Again, based on the rule, how is this not hands to the head or illegal contact to the head? I gave a pass rush to QB example sure, but there have been tons of interior linemen incidents that have resulted in the same penalty called ect. What is the rule, and based on the rule how is this not a penalty?
 

Ozarkdawg

Active member
Apr 1, 2017
585
375
63
Again, based on the rule, how is this not hands to the head or illegal contact to the head? I gave a pass rush to QB example sure, but there have been tons of interior linemen incidents that have resulted in the same penalty called ect. What is the rule, and based on the rule how is this not a penalty?
In this NFL video, it's not because it's a close line play and NOT forceful contact. Outside the line, even non-forceful would be a penalty. Not sure, but I suspect college rule is similar.

 
  • Like
Reactions: bulldoghair

bulldoghair

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2013
1,168
721
108
In this NFL video, it's not because it's a close line play and NOT forceful contact. Outside the line, even non-forceful would be a penalty. Not sure, but I suspect college rule is similar.

Thanks for the link. It says, “Contact in close-line play that is not direct and forcible is not a foul.”

Although, this is before the play, there is no attempt to block, and it seems pretty direct on him intentionally smacking him in the head pretty good. I get your point and interpretation, but this to me still doesn’t fall into that definition exactly.
 

dickiedawg

Active member
Feb 22, 2008
3,675
416
83
I have still yet to figure out why a RB can stiff arm a defender in the facemask and that isn't a penalty, but if the defender's pinky barely grazes the RB's facemask then it's 15 yards. Same thing on why can they lower their head and lead with the crown of the helmet and it not be targeting.
A defender’s pinky barely grazing the RBs facemask is not a penalty. Once upon a time there was a 5 yard penalty for incidental face mask but now you have to grasp the face mask.
There is a separate penalty for illegal use of hands/hands to the face that you see called on linemen.
As for a stiff arm, the RB can be called for a face mask if they grab the defender’s face mask. They can also be called for targeting if they initiate contact with the crown of their helmet, and that’s one I think you could see called more often than it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login