Close counts in horse shoes!! (and now Cornhole too!!)Teams James needs to beat still won by double digits. Close only counts if your dropping bombs, means nothing in sports
Well in today’s world, I should have left out the bombs part out. I will edit my post. Point remains the same, until he starts beating these teams. It doesn’t matter to me what his record is against the rest of the conference. If championship’s don’t matter to folks, we don’t need a new stadium or fancy practice facility. Most importantly we don’t need to spend 12million dollars a season on a staff. I saw the championship years live and in person. Really hope we can do it again. Manny is doing a good job but it still to early to say he’s better. We don’t know how long he is going to be here.Close counts in horse shoes!! (and now Cornhole too!!)
I totally agree!! Defense wins Championships!!Well in today’s world, I should have left out the bombs part out. I will edit my post. Point remains the same, until he starts beating these teams. It doesn’t matter to me what his record is against the rest of the conference. If championship’s don’t matter to folks, we don’t need a new stadium or fancy practice facility. Most importantly we don’t need to spend 12million dollars a season on a staff. I saw the championship years live and in person. Really hope we can do it again. Manny is doing a good job but it still to early to say he’s better. We don’t know how long he is going to be here.
This is a ridiculous comment regarding OSU exploiting our run defense. They had 98 net yards rushing in 26 attempts. 41 of those yards were on one carry by Henderson. Without that carry they have 57 yards. To hold them under 100 is good defense. Michigan took advantage over poor gap control by our players, not scheme.the fact remains, both OSU & UM exploited Manny's D vs run, as Manny's D was not sound vs the run. Thats why we got beat, not talent.
We’ve absolutely gotten out of the business of turning mediocre opposing quarterbacks into Heisman candidates. Clear upgrade.
We do have the nipple thread!If we weren’t us, we’d be lucky to have Manny Diaz, but nothing works out for us.
and those 41 yds came when they werent sound. you can play a 1 and a 5 to strong side, but also expect the back to hit his head on the goal posts.This is a ridiculous comment regarding OSU exploiting our run defense. They had 98 net yards rushing in 26 attempts. 41 of those yards were on one carry by Henderson. Without that carry they have 57 yards. To hold them under 100 is good defense. Michigan took advantage over poor gap control by our players, not scheme.
When did bean bag turn into Cornhole, and i'm afraid to Google it.Close counts in horse shoes!! (and now Cornhole too!!)
Only leads to trouble anyway!
and those 41 yds came when they werent sound. you can play a 1 and a 5 to strong side, but also expect the back to hit his head on the goal posts.
we had poor gap control vs UM because when we lined up, we were out manned at the POA.
vs OSU
vs UM not sound, no force to the TE side, DE inside of the TE
Close counts in horse shoes!! (and now Cornhole too!!)
Be honest. You came into this with heavy bias against MD.the fact remains, both OSU & UM exploited Manny's D vs run, as Manny's D was not sound vs the run. Thats why we got beat, not talent.
and it got heavier when Manny started having our guys line up without giving them a chance to be successful. You cant run a 7 to the TE with out somebody being outside to force or contain. Heck you as the TE could make that block vs Reggie White. And thats why we got beat. Our guys played hard, they were put into impossible positions.Be honest. You came into this with heavy bias against MD.
say whatever you want but the tape does not lie. We werent sound defensively on those plays. and thats his job to make sure we are.I agree with @CvilleElksCoach. Our defense left the middle of the field open all day but Day chose not to exploit it until the end of the game. It's like OSU was trying to play Michigan style bully ball the first 3 1/2 quarters and it wasn't working so they just decided to take what we were giving them. Were they practicing on us what they're going to try to do vs. Michigan since that's how Michigan trounced them last year? I don't know, nut it wasn't our run defense that was the issue in that game.
bias prevents people from making honest impartial assessments.and it got heavier when Manny started having our guys line up without giving them a chance to be successful. You cant run a 7 to the TE with out somebody being outside to force or contain. Heck you as the TE could make that block vs Reggie White. And thats why we got beat. Our guys played hard, they were put into impossible positions.
The fact is we just didn't match up well with Michigan. We were in the game with Ohio State and had it not been for 4 turnovers by the offense (one a pick six) we had a fair chance of winning that game.the fact remains, both OSU & UM exploited Manny's D vs run, as Manny's D was not sound vs the run. Thats why we got beat, not talent.
fact is, we were not sound to the TE side. tape does not lie.The fact is we just didn't match up well with Michigan. We were in the game with Ohio State and had it not been for 4 turnovers by the offense (one a pick six) we had a fair chance of winning that game.
true but also the tape does not lie, watch the tape. I marked jury still out btwbias prevents people from making honest impartial assessments.
The run D issues stem from developed talent. There aren't enough seasoned, big kids on the interior of the line. The DEs are also super talented, but younger and smaller. It's easier to scheme around the DEs. The DTs are an issue against big, physical teams. No way around that.the fact remains, both OSU & UM exploited Manny's D vs run, as Manny's D was not sound vs the run. Thats why we got beat, not talent.
has nothing to do with that. when you line someone up with no chance of success, you can have the second coming of Burce Clark and Matt Millen, backed up by Sean Lee and they couldnt stop it. Watch the tape. at UM the DE is lined up inside the TE, and the DE has contain. You just gave him an impossible job.The run D issues stem from developed talent. There aren't enough seasoned, big kids on the interior of the line. The DEs are also super talented, but younger and smaller. It's easier to scheme around the DEs. The DTs are an issue against big, physical teams. No way around that.
I have a perfect solution. Fire Manny and hire YOU. Obviously, you know more about defensive X and Os than he does. In fact, you must know more than his whole defensive staff. None of them saw what you clearly saw, so why not fire them?say whatever you want but the tape does not lie. We werent sound defensively on those plays. and thats his job to make sure we are.
Watch the tape. The only hope is when they watched the tape they saw the problems, fixed the problems, and don’t let it happen againI have a perfect solution. Fire Manny and hire YOU. Obviously, you know more about defensive X and Os than he does. In fact, you must know more than his whole defensive staff. None of them saw what you clearly saw, so why not fire them?
I think the defense is playing better overall, but I’m not smart enough to know whether it’s attributed to coaching or better, smarter, more experienced players.
Doesn't matter what "we" think of Manny....he won't be here very long. He hates us.If we weren’t us, we’d be lucky to have Manny Diaz, but nothing works out for us.
Yes because other coaches donate their servicesWatch the tape. The only hope is when they watched the tape they saw the problems, fixed the problems, and don’t let it happen again
otoh seeing how DC in the B1G make around a $1,000,000 per yr I’d be down with that
I don’t know if I can do better. But I do know we’ll be sound on D
For $1, 000, 000 PSU deserves better