You started a political thread and don’t want it to get political?
I have no problem with common ground.
Let me tell you what isn’t common ground.
calling one president or candidate racist for “building a wall” when the opposite party supported the exact same wall
calling one president or candidate an animal for putting kids in cages solely based on a picture released by the media (said picture turns out to be under Obama). Very little effective difference between one policy and the other. Very little EFFECTIVE difference.
calling Hispanics white supremacist but not acknowledging many blacks are just as or more racist than any other race.
abortiion? Trying to force states to be like your state or your thinking. I don’t care if California aborts new borns. I mean I do but I’m not gonna get in their business but stay the 17 out of Mississippi’s business.
abortion? Most people would be ok with abortion with reasonable limits. Clearly defined reasonable limits.
fascism and dictators? The group calling people fascist and dictators want a strong federal government which leads to dictatorships
Sorry if political. Not really.
Im not yelling at anyone. I’m not singling anyone out. I’m singling a significant group and size of people out that are hypocritical based on the above and I could provide documented examples.
Excellent demonstration of very poor comprehension!
"calling one president or candidate racist for “building a wall” when the opposite party supported the exact same wall"
No, that's not why he was called racist. That's just one reason why he was called dumb. He was called racist for, most closely related to your comment but by far not the only reason, that he called all Mexican immigrants rapists and murderers. Which IS racist.
calling one president or candidate an animal for putting kids in cages solely based on a picture released by the media (said picture turns out to be under Obama). Very little effective difference between one policy and the other. Very little EFFECTIVE difference.
Not solely. Plenty of difference. Just ask the separated kids that still haven't been found.
calling Hispanics white supremacist but not acknowledging many blacks are just as or more racist than any other race.
Some Hispanics are white supremacists. You accepting that now, or still denying it? And hey, some blacks ARE racist. I don't know who you think has denied that.
abortiion? Trying to force states to be like your state or your thinking. I don’t care if California aborts new borns. I mean I do but I’m not gonna get in their business but stay the 17 out of Mississippi’s business.
Who is trying to force states? Roe vs Wade didn't mandate all the rules, it just set the permissible level of govt intrusion at after viability, for VERY good reasons that you zealots are just now starting to catch onto. It also allowed for reasonable interpretation of how to regulate that, which every state did differently.
Are you in denial that the stated goal of conservatives and Republicans is a national law/amendment that very much tells the states they can't allow abortions?
Why should states stay out of MSs business but MS can't stay out of parents and doctors business?
Like most liberals, I'm fine with outlawing elective abortion, but unlike people like you, I can see the problems in trying to enforce that. Either you leave large loopholes that dishonest people will drive a Mack truck through to enable elective abortion in the name of "medically necessary", or you restrict medically necessary abortions so stringently that you in reality cause medical harm to parents who only wanted a baby but ran into a medical problem. Concern for the latter is what drove the law to be what is was, outright ignorance of the reality of that is what drove people like you to make the law what it is right now.
abortion? Most people would be ok with abortion with reasonable limits. Clearly defined reasonable limits.
Indeed. Are you one? Why do you support politicians that aren't those people? Why do you think liberals aren't those people?
fascism and dictators? The group calling people fascist and dictators want a strong federal government which leads to dictatorships
Dictatorships often arise from WEAK governments. And there are so many examples of strong govts that have never led to dictatorships. So that wasn't a smart statement.
The Republican Party is clearly on the path to fascism. So why do you support it, if you don't want fascism?
You don't have to answer these of course. I will only respond to intelligent responses or respectful inquiries, so I don't expect this to continue. But if you seek enlightenment, I will help provide it. Have a great day!