…you’re worse than you think you are when you lose. So there’s that.
We do- but some of these guys don't.We deserve better![]()
Are we going to leave college football to the Days and the Harbaughs?
Company Man (should stick to re-hashing tales of yore when he and Hack saved the program)….:
All the best players, they’re way better than I am,” Dahmen says. “I’ll never be a top-10 player in the world and I’ll never win majors.”
Dahmen, who’s currently ranked 90th in the world, is not your typical pro golfer. Unlike the top stars on Tour, he’s not galavanting the globe in a chartered jet. His home is not a mega mansion, but rather a quaint house in Scottsdale, Ariz. And he shares few aspirations of becoming a top talent in pro golf.
“Somebody’s got to be the 70th-best golfer in the world,” he says. “It might as well be me.”
![]()
(Check out his episode on Netflix Full Swing. It is a hoot )
Company Man (should stick to re-hashing tales of yore when he and Hack saved the program)….:
Company Man (should stick to re-hashing tales of yore when he and Hack saved the program)….:
Can we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
Careful. Coach at best 10-2 is more accurate.Can we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
Company Man (should stick to re-hashing tales of yore when he and Hack saved the program)….:
Well said.I have a hard time believing that offensive performance surprised the coaches (maybe it did - I can't read their minds - but I don't think so).
Throughout the season to date:
They had tried - with limited success - to find some better combinations on the offensive line. It wasn't really working, even against the bottom of the barrel Big Ten teams. I have to believe in their heart-of-hearts they knew they were only getting "compete against OSU" level play from 2 of their starting 5, and were willing to at least look at any option to try to get to 3 or 4 solid positions.
They had to recognize that they had no playmaker among their wide receiver group. Again, they tried some other options - with no success - and then tried to get back to emphasizing the TE group, which showed some flashes, but (obviously) is no substitute for having downfield threats.
They had to know that the pass game was woefully lacking downfield plays (and, given the long history of emphasis, they certainly know that generating explosive plays - and driving up the yards per play efficiency - is probably the single biggest correlator to winning big games). Whatever they tried, they couldn't even generate a small spark in tinder on that front all year. They had to be extremely concerned about that.
If the staff was truly, in any way, surprised by that offensive performance, I would be shocked (and very disappointed in their level of awareness). Hoping for the best? Sure. But hope isn't a solid plan.
That doesn't address concerns many have with the "What was the plan?" issues surrounding the offensive game plan for OSU - but that is a different issue.
Is there talent on the squad - even on the offensive side? Sure there is.
Moreso, by far, than anyone but UM and OSU in the offensively incompetent Big Ten.
But there is - and has been - pretty much nothing that has been executing at a level to compete with the defenses of UM and OSU. Not even close. Can that change? Sure it can. Will it? Time will tell.
Company Man (should stick to re-hashing tales of yore when he and Hack saved the program)….:
Mr. SeptemberCan we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
Well that certainly seems to be our ceiling. 10-2 and 3rd best team in the Big Ten. If you compare our position to the SEC, we would be the Ole Miss of the Big Ten.Can we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
No 1-9Can we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
How about Coach "Obviously"?Can we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
I have a hard time believing that offensive performance surprised the coaches (maybe it did - I can't read their minds - but I don't think so).
Throughout the season to date:
They had tried - with limited success - to find some better combinations on the offensive line. It wasn't really working, even against the bottom of the barrel Big Ten teams. I have to believe in their heart-of-hearts they knew they were only getting "compete against OSU" level play from 2 of their starting 5, and were willing to at least look at any option to try to get to 3 or 4 solid positions.
They had to recognize that they had no playmaker among their wide receiver group. Again, they tried some other options - with no success - and then tried to get back to emphasizing the TE group, which showed some flashes, but (obviously) is no substitute for having downfield threats.
They had to know that the pass game was woefully lacking downfield plays (and, given the long history of emphasis, they certainly know that generating explosive plays - and driving up the yards per play efficiency - is probably the single biggest correlator to winning big games). Whatever they tried, they couldn't even generate a small spark in tinder on that front all year. They had to be extremely concerned about that.
If the staff was truly, in any way, surprised by that offensive performance, I would be shocked (and very disappointed in their level of awareness). Hoping for the best? Sure. But hope isn't a solid plan.
That doesn't address concerns many have with the "What was the plan?" issues surrounding the offensive game plan for OSU - but that is a different issue.
Is there talent on the squad - even on the offensive side? Sure there is.
Moreso, by far, than anyone but UM and OSU in the offensively incompetent Big Ten.
But there is - and has been - pretty much nothing that has been executing at a level to compete with the defenses of UM and OSU. Not even close. Can that change? Sure it can. Will it? Time will tell.
We should be so lucky!Can we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
So maybe we should schedule OSU and USCUM right after Labor Day!Mr. September
To me, the away game at tOSU seemed more winnable than the upcoming home game against UM. I hope that I'm wrong, but when I take off the blue and white glasses I see that UM is clearly a better team than PSU. At least we PSU fans won't be as deluded as we were going into the 1997 34-8 beating. I hope I'm wrong, but PSU over UM would be an upset.A lot of words to say, are they as good as OSU or Michigan? No. Can they be? Maybe.
This is likely as close as we get - on paper - to being fairly even talent-wise with OSU for some time. We desperately have to hope our players get better because after 10 years we know what we’ve got in our head coach.
How about "Big Game James?"How about Coach "Obviously"?
We already haveAre we going to leave college football to the Days and the Harbaughs?
Big Game JamesCan we start calling Franklin “Coach 10-2”? Every year 10-2.
FWIW (not much), I don't know if OSU had the more "talented" team on 10/21/23.A lot of words to say, are they as good as OSU or Michigan? No. Can they be? Maybe.
This is likely as close as we get - on paper - to being fairly even talent-wise with OSU for some time. We desperately have to hope our players get better because after 10 years we know what we’ve got in our head coach.
We need this now....more than the team, more than the coaching staff and more than the Athletic Department. WE......need this.....now....
Good work but you need to work "obviously" in thereBlack Shoes
Basic Blues
All Blame
No Game
![]()
Good work but you need to work "obviously" in there
“Big Game” James Berganer….Big Game James
"Bob, you're done already?" Bob: "Obviously!"Obviously.