He has to keep his head up. The point of that part of the rule is to protect the defender.I have no idea what Preston was supposed to do. Daniels jumped into him to initiate contact.
This ^^^Can’t lead with crown of the helmet. I was pissed… not so much because it was the wrong call, but because that doesn’t get called 9 out of 10 times. They normally don’t call it unless it’s a hit to the helmet. I’ve seen hits like the one today called targeting in real time and then overturned. It’s honestly up to each ref
Yeah, that’s when I turned the **** show off for good. The little bastard was fixing to go all the way, if he hadn’t stopped him.Was that targeting on JT Daniels? It looked like a bs call in person.
Funny I was in the stadium and quit about the same time.I quit watching in the second quarter
He would have been bowled if he had not “targeted”. That’s their quarterback. I honestly think it caught him off guard that the quarterback was lunging up (like preparing to hurdle him) instead of sliding. If we are going to have that as targeting, I think these mobile quarterbacks/quarterbacks in general should have to declare at the beginning of the game if they are a running back that throws or a quarterback. If you are a quarterback, then you get the protection of the slide. The defender is second guessing on what to do there most of the time. Our guy committed, and was ejected for it. I can suffer through crappy play. I got up and went to the shop after that call. That’s crap.I'll be ok with those calls if they would also call it on ballcarriers who lower their heads. They never do.
This… was a reaction move, he keeps his head up, his own neck is at risk.I have no idea what Preston was supposed to do. Daniels jumped into him to initiate contact.
Barstool, now that is impressive.Barstool sports had two different bloggers independently blog about how terrible the call was.
Yes. He did lead with the crown of his helmet.Was that targeting on JT Daniels? It looked like a bs call in person.
It was, no argument.Was that targeting on JT Daniels? It looked like a bs call in person.
According to the rule, if you lead with the crown of the helmet it is targeting, no matter if it's helmet to helmet or helmet to whatever. That was absolutely targeting. That part of the rule is to protect the tackler. What he did is how you wind up like Chucky Mullens.Once Daniels jumped that wasn't targeting. It was a bad call. Had to be helmet to helmet to be targeting in that situation. Wasn't a defenseless player. It was discussed in an online show and that's what they were saying.
Lead with the crown of his helmet to the lower extremity. Not head to head; no targeting. Since no one can decipher the rule, why have it?Yes. He did lead with the crown of his helmet.
By rule, yesWas that targeting on JT Daniels? It looked like a bs call in person.
I agree. I think he would have done the same with another opportunity. Good football play.I could not argue with the call. Good lick!
It looked like about 1/3 the east side was LSU fans. Was that a good assessment?Funny I was in the stadium and quit about the same time.
Why? Because the crew running the Jumbotron couldn’t figure how to show replays again yesterday ? I’m curious about that - did they struggle again this week? Last week was pathetic.Was that targeting on JT Daniels? It looked like a bs call in person.
No. The replays worked. They showed what looked to me like a nice form shoulder tackle.Why? Because the crew running the Jumbotron couldn’t figure how to show replays again yesterday ? I’m curious about that - did they struggle again this week? Last week was pathetic.
I think the stripe out made it look more like that id call it more like 1/4.It looked like about 1/3 the east side was LSU fans. Was that a good assessment?
Btw that was me that found you on Facebook lolOnce Daniels jumped that wasn't targeting. It was a bad call. Had to be helmet to helmet to be targeting in that situation. Wasn't a defenseless player. It was discussed in an online show and that's what they were saying.
The foul for targeting is 100% to protect the one lowering their head. 0% to protect the one getting hit.And then you have the cheap hit on Hunter in the Colorado game. They called unnecessary roughness on the play, but I felt like that play was more targeting even though he didn’t lead with crown. There was definite intent.