(unconfirmed) Cliff is back

fastlax16

Member
Aug 24, 2017
125
199
43
If true, well, on the one hand, he doesn't have a future in the NFL, so it makes sense from that standpoint.

On the other hand, it might be time to turn over the offense to the younger guys....

On point 1- agreed.
On point 2- agreed with a (big) caveat. I think its good for the program if Franklin is willing to break with his tendency and Allar actually gets some game action as the course of a game or the season allows.

I like the idea of hedging, depending on how the first 6 games play out. If we are sitting at 3-3 after 6 games with losses to Auburn, OSU and Michigan then its time to let Allar see the field quite a bit, maybe turn over the reigns, against the weaker back half of the schedule. If we are 5-1 or 4-2 with the CFP or Division still within reach you ride with Clifford. If we are 3-3 and Clifford take 95% of the snaps over the final 6 games then 2021 is a waste and we've set ourselves back in 2022.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
10,489
14,472
113
If true, well, on the one hand, he doesn't have a future in the NFL, so it makes sense from that standpoint.

On the other hand, it might be time to turn over the offense to the younger guys....
I got a similar take. This seems to be a weak draft class for quarterbacks, so I was halfway expecting him to declare. It's likely that he got some advice regarding his chances in the NFL and here we are today. I'm not brimming over with enthusiasm about this news.
 

PAgeologist

Active member
Oct 19, 2021
285
348
63
On point 1- agreed.
On point 2- agreed with a (big) caveat. I think its good for the program if Franklin is willing to break with his tendency and Allar actually gets some game action as the course of a game or the season allows.

I like the idea of hedging, depending on how the first 6 games play out. If we are sitting at 3-3 after 6 games with losses to Auburn, OSU and Michigan then its time to let Allar see the field quite a bit, maybe turn over the reigns, against the weaker back half of the schedule. If we are 5-1 or 4-2 with the CFP or Division still within reach you ride with Clifford. If we are 3-3 and Clifford take 95% of the snaps over the final 6 games then 2021 is a waste and we've set ourselves back in 2022.
That would be great if it actually happened that way. But similar to a bowl game and the extra practices, Franklin has his guys and that's who will play. It's played out that way all season, player performance be damned.

If SC comes back, he will probably play all season regardless of the teams record. Unless he is forced to the sideline due to injury.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
10,489
14,472
113
I don't think a healtht SC is bad for PSU. It gives the young guys a chance to acclimate to CFB. No matter how good you are it is a jump and you are never sure how fast guys can make it.
I'm in favor of perhaps taking some lumps next year in exchange for making serious bang two seasons down the road.

This might seem to be cold, and I do appreciate the effort and courage SC has shown, but it's time to Next Man Up.
 

fastlax16

Member
Aug 24, 2017
125
199
43
That would be great if it actually happened that way. But similar to a bowl game and the extra practices, Franklin has his guys and that's who will play. It's played out that way all season, player performance be damned.

If SC comes back, he will probably play all season regardless of the teams record. Unless he is forced to the sideline due to injury.

That's my concern as it is Franklin's MO. Yurcich doesn't have a great history either and you have to go back a bit to find anything encouraging. Backups at UT attempted 22 passes in 2022. OSUs took 50 behind Fields in 2019. OK State's took 8, 14, 17, 61, 123, 193 in 18,17,16,15,14,13 respectively. The backup came in in 2013 after a season ending injury to the starter. 2014 he lost his job to Mason Rudolph after 9 games. 2015 were junk snaps other than one game Rudolph didnt start due to injury.
 

psuro

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
7,687
16,846
113
So, when was the last time PSU had a QB who started 4 straight seasons?

Maybe Tony Sacca?
 

CvilleElksCoach

Well-known member
Oct 8, 2021
1,070
2,910
93
Have a friend who works with the program in a support function hearing rumblings that he's back. Take it fwiw.
Not commenting if you friend is right or wrong, but if he really works with the program, he is being very reckless. I'm very close to the program for several reasons and I know James is very strict about information leaking from Lasch. Your friend will be out quickly if he doesn't learn to keep his mouth shut.
 

psuro

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
7,687
16,846
113
Was he a full time starter all four years? Didn't he battle it out with Senneca for a year or two? Wasn't Senneca listed ahead of him for a bit? SC didn't start every game but he was the listed starter I believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbrown

VaDave4PSU

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,989
2,322
113
If the OL doesn't drastically improve, are we interested in killing CV, Allar, and Pribula in '22 just so we can say "new starter?"

Maybe Day set us a good precedent. Ewers is still there. Did he play a snap all year? Unless he got in vs Sparty, I don't think he did prior.

Or maybe somebody has a hell of a spring.

Or who knows. I'll feel more when it's confirmed.
 

PAgeologist

Active member
Oct 19, 2021
285
348
63
That's my concern as it is Franklin's MO. Yurcich doesn't have a great history either and you have to go back a bit to find anything encouraging. Backups at UT attempted 22 passes in 2022. OSUs took 50 behind Fields in 2019. OK State's took 8, 14, 17, 61, 123, 193 in 18,17,16,15,14,13 respectively. The backup came in in 2013 after a season ending injury to the starter. 2014 he lost his job to Mason Rudolph after 9 games. 2015 were junk snaps other than one game Rudolph didnt start due to injury.
I guess it depends also on why the backup is in the game. If it's due to injury or inefficient play of the starter then they should play the normal playbook. If the backup is in for garbage time in a winning blowout then they probably shouldn't be passing too much.

The other issue is that if SC some back, does that slot CV as the #2 and kick Allar and Pribula down to 3 and 4? If Allar and or Pribula are the future, one or both should probably see some meaningful playing time next year. Especially if you can play 4 games and maintain a red shirt.
 

Madsol

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
343
724
93
Was he a full time starter all four years? Didn't he battle it out with Senneca for a year or two? Wasn't Senneca listed ahead of him for a bit? SC didn't start every game but he was the listed starter I believe.

Seneca was definitely the starter at the beginning of 2001. Not sure when Mills took over as starter. Mills came in to win the Northwestern game the week before OSU but pretty sure Seneca started the OSU game. Then Mills came in and we stromed back to win that game and I think Mills took over as starter after that. But that's going on memory from 20 years ago.
 
Nov 1, 2021
117
117
43
I'm in favor of perhaps taking some lumps next year in exchange for making serious bang two seasons down the road.

This might seem to be cold, and I do appreciate the effort and courage SC has shown, but it's time to Next Man Up.

The thing is though, I think the team would be better served with Veilleux at the helm. With Clifford starting and Alllar/Pribulea coming in, there's probably a good chance that CV portals out. As it is, I think CV is a better passer than SC anyway. If SC wants another year to show the NFL what he can do, he should probably transfer to another school.
 

PSU Mike

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,285
3,749
113
I’m happy if he comes back. We can always not play him. There’s no option to play him if he’s not rostered. It takes up only one of 85 slots and that last guy out that he displaces probably isn’t going make as big a difference.

With 2-3 others in the mix - each being a step up from their same-string 2021 counterparts — we can allow Sean to run a little more recklessly, which seems to be required for our O to be successful.
 

LionJim

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
10,489
14,472
113
I’m happy if he comes back. We can always not play him. There’s no option to play him if he’s not rostered. It takes up only one of 85 slots and that last guy out that he displaces probably isn’t going make as big a difference.
Were it that simple. If SC comes back he is starting, is 100% my take. I just don’t see it happening otherwise.
 

Bvillebaron

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,587
1,711
113
I'm in favor of perhaps taking some lumps next year in exchange for making serious bang two seasons down the road.

This might seem to be cold, and I do appreciate the effort and courage SC has shown, but it's time to Next Man Up.
I agree 100%
 

VaDave4PSU

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,989
2,322
113
The thing is though, I think the team would be better served with Veilleux at the helm. With Clifford starting and Alllar/Pribulea coming in, there's probably a good chance that CV portals out. As it is, I think CV is a better passer than SC anyway. If SC wants another year to show the NFL what he can do, he should probably transfer to another school.

I am kind of inline with this.

Cincy is losing Ritter this year as well.
 

fastlax16

Member
Aug 24, 2017
125
199
43
Seneca was definitely the starter at the beginning of 2001. Not sure when Mills took over as starter. Mills came in to win the Northwestern game the week before OSU but pretty sure Seneca started the OSU game. Then Mills came in and we stromed back to win that game and I think Mills took over as starter after that. But that's going on memory from 20 years ago.

Looks like they were back and forth. Mills actually had significantly more attempts in the opener than Senneca actually.

 
Last edited:

PAgeologist

Active member
Oct 19, 2021
285
348
63
The thing is though, I think the team would be better served with Veilleux at the helm. With Clifford starting and Alllar/Pribulea coming in, there's probably a good chance that CV portals out. As it is, I think CV is a better passer than SC anyway. If SC wants another year to show the NFL what he can do, he should probably transfer to another school.
If SC has NFL dreams and thinks he is close, he absolutely should transfer. Getting the hell beat out of him again with this team isn't going to do anything for him. He has done a nice job for the most part here, but it's probably best for both parties to move on.
 

PSUFTG

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,455
2,258
113
I'm in favor of perhaps taking some lumps next year in exchange for making serious bang two seasons down the road.

This might seem to be cold, and I do appreciate the effort and courage SC has shown, but it's time to Next Man Up.
I am not sure that it is a given that "taking lumps" for a year (by, presumably, throwing a freshman out there as the full-time Day 1 starter) would lead to "more serious bang" down the road.
Could be just the opposite - that allowing a kid to acclimate and take on minimal responsibilities early - even an entire freshman season - might lead to greater development and long term return. We can't know that, either way, but I don't think it is a given that trial by fire (which so many NFL and College teams do with highly regarded rookie QBs - like a Sam Danold with the Jets, or Bo Nix at Auburn, as opposed to an Aaron Rodgers at Green Bay, or Kerry Collins at Penn State spending time as an understudy) is the better long-term solution. No way to know for sure, but just putting that out there.
 

donaldfair71

Member
Nov 8, 2021
268
238
43
On point 1- agreed.
On point 2- agreed with a (big) caveat. I think its good for the program if Franklin is willing to break with his tendency and Allar actually gets some game action as the course of a game or the season allows.

I like the idea of hedging, depending on how the first 6 games play out. If we are sitting at 3-3 after 6 games with losses to Auburn, OSU and Michigan then its time to let Allar see the field quite a bit, maybe turn over the reigns, against the weaker back half of the schedule. If we are 5-1 or 4-2 with the CFP or Division still within reach you ride with Clifford. If we are 3-3 and Clifford take 95% of the snaps over the final 6 games then 2021 is a waste and we've set ourselves back in 2022.
That would be great if it actually happened that way. But similar to a bowl game and the extra practices, Franklin has his guys and that's who will play. It's played out that way all season, player performance be damned.

If SC comes back, he will probably play all season regardless of the teams record. Unless he is forced to the sideline due to injury.

SC isn't coming back to sit. I am certain that Franklin knows this as well and will coach accordingly,

Now whether some intervention in a struggling season happens is another issue. On one hand, I like to think that in a lost season, young guys would play. But I also can't get the thought of CV looking great (or competent) one week, then sitting the next at Michigan State. That season to see a young guy could have been this past month, still didn't happen.

Was CV hurt last weekend?
 

MacNit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,141
1,185
113
On point 1- agreed.
On point 2- agreed with a (big) caveat. I think its good for the program if Franklin is willing to break with his tendency and Allar actually gets some game action as the course of a game or the season allows.

I like the idea of hedging, depending on how the first 6 games play out. If we are sitting at 3-3 after 6 games with losses to Auburn, OSU and Michigan then its time to let Allar see the field quite a bit, maybe turn over the reigns, against the weaker back half of the schedule. If we are 5-1 or 4-2 with the CFP or Division still within reach you ride with Clifford. If we are 3-3 and Clifford take 95% of the snaps over the final 6 games then 2021 is a waste and we've set ourselves back in 2022.
Let’s get Allar signed first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGlovStillRules

BW Lion

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2021
3,103
2,436
113
Not commenting if you friend is right or wrong, but if he really works with the program, he is being very reckless. I'm very close to the program for several reasons and I know James is very strict about information leaking from Lasch. Your friend will be out quickly if he doesn't learn to keep his mouth shut.
The larger the organization, the more difficult it becomes to control information flow.
 

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
9,758
20,496
113
On point 1- agreed.
On point 2- agreed with a (big) caveat. I think its good for the program if Franklin is willing to break with his tendency and Allar actually gets some game action as the course of a game or the season allows.

I like the idea of hedging, depending on how the first 6 games play out. If we are sitting at 3-3 after 6 games with losses to Auburn, OSU and Michigan then its time to let Allar see the field quite a bit, maybe turn over the reigns, against the weaker back half of the schedule. If we are 5-1 or 4-2 with the CFP or Division still within reach you ride with Clifford. If we are 3-3 and Clifford take 95% of the snaps over the final 6 games then 2021 is a waste and we've set ourselves back in 2022.
+1. My fear is that Franklin does the same thing and doesn't get any of the backups any valuable playing time. Also if Clifford does come back I don't see CV, Drew or Beau all sticking.
Its a very tricky situation but Im in the "lets move forward with the younger guys camp".
 

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
9,758
20,496
113
Was he a full time starter all four years? Didn't he battle it out with Senneca for a year or two? Wasn't Senneca listed ahead of him for a bit? SC didn't start every game but he was the listed starter I believe.
He came in for an injured Senneca in the NW game and then I think Senneca came back and started the OSU game but Mills came back in with some heroics and won it and was the starter after. At least thats kind of how I remember it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hohmadw1978

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
9,758
20,496
113
Seneca was definitely the starter at the beginning of 2001. Not sure when Mills took over as starter. Mills came in to win the Northwestern game the week before OSU but pretty sure Seneca started the OSU game. Then Mills came in and we stromed back to win that game and I think Mills took over as starter after that. But that's going on memory from 20 years ago.
Thats was me recollection as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hohmadw1978
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login