Yep. Seems like every team I root for has ****** grip on the field. USNWT and MSU football.Also, somebody at Nike needs to be fired over these cleats. Half the team looked like they were on skates.
Yep. Seems like every team I root for has ****** grip on the field. USNWT and MSU football.Also, somebody at Nike needs to be fired over these cleats. Half the team looked like they were on skates.
This 100%. That's a great summary of the situation in that particular game, and US Soccer as a whole.USA has the better athletes. Netherlands has the better technical soccer players.
Oh 17n get over yourself. Political messages have been a part of sports literally for the entire history of organized play. Just because you find this particular messages do not align with your bigot opinions doesn't mean it is any different today than it was in 1936.For me, the reason I haven’t gotten all warm and fuzzy with the women’s team is because they operated as a political organization that played sports. Whether it was Rapinoe kneeling for the national anthem to the gay pride stuff to the equal pay controversy which was basically a war against the men’s team, it really gets on my nerves. Also, idiots in the media would be like “The women’s team is better than the men’s team, and deserve lots more money.” When the truth is the reason they are dominant is because women in most countries are oppressed and don’t have the rights women here do to play soccer at a high level. But most of the old guard who I couldn’t stand has either retired or is about to. Rapinoe is retiring at the end of the season and she probably won’t play much in this tournament. The moment she is gone, I’ll start liking the women’s team a whole lot more.
All political, as someone else described. But as I said in the OP, politics be damned, I want the US to win at everything.There was one other post last night that got locked wanting the US team to lose. Not trying to ruin this thread, but what is the deal with that?
The U.S. dominated the second half and really should have scored another goal. The Netherlands are more skilled on the ball but that didn't really lead to more chances for them. They had possession, like Mexico used to do against the men, which made them look so much better in the first half. Nothing wrong with letting other teams kick the ball around leading to nothing. Horan going after her Dutch friend after a hard tackle and then scoring the header was great. Good to see some toughness from the gals. We had only one sub and could have used some fresh legs because the Dutch were tiring. It's starting to look like the women's game has more than a couple of teams good enough to win a world cup. I like Europe and European football. I also like watching U.S. national teams beat European teams in soccer.
I knew this would be a tough game. Portugal played England to a 0-0 draw a few months ago and only lost to Netherlands 1-0 in group stage. Sweden is going to kill this team. US has been lazy developing talent and has let NWSL become a 2nd rate league. Payday is coming Sunday morning. The coach will be the scapegoat, but the problems go a lot deeper than the head coach.I didn't stay up for last night's game (0-0 tie with Portugal), but I watched some highlights and read some recaps. Unfortunately, I think the US is in trouble and are lucky to even be going to the round of 16.
Sweden is going to be tough.
The reality is that the US women will never win another World Cup, ever. Anyone that disagrees hasn’t been paying attention.I knew this would be a tough game. Portugal played England to a 0-0 draw a few months ago and only lost to Netherlands 1-0 in group stage. Sweden is going to kill this team. US has been lazy developing talent and has let NWSL become a 2nd rate league. Payday is coming Sunday morning. The coach will be the scapegoat, but the problems go a lot deeper than the head coach.
Only way they'll have a chance is if their they adopt the Brazil men's approach. All of their players play in Europe. Of course, Brazil men haven't won a World Cup in 21 years themselves (or even finished in the top 3).The reality is that the US women will never win another World Cup, ever. Anyone that disagrees hasn’t been paying attention.
No real leadership. I think it was you who said it last week - we seem to be missing a generation between the youngsters (Smith, Rodman) and the oldsters (Alex, Ertz, Blue hair).I knew this would be a tough game. Portugal played England to a 0-0 draw a few months ago and only lost to Netherlands 1-0 in group stage. Sweden is going to kill this team. US has been lazy developing talent and has let NWSL become a 2nd rate league. Payday is coming Sunday morning. The coach will be the scapegoat, but the problems go a lot deeper than the head coach.
The talent isn't there. The women's youth development is a shambles. Last 2 U20 World Cup teams didn't even make it out of group stage.Read an article recently that the talent is here, but if you are not politically/socially aligned you have a very small shot of making the cut.
Too much money not to mention coaches jobs on the line to let political views get in the way. I call shenanigansRead an article recently that the talent is here, but if you are not politically/socially aligned you have a very small shot of making the cut.
That might be the most confusing explanation I've ever heard in my life for why our soccer team has gotten worse. our problems with class and race are the reasons why other countries have more talent in soccer.We're just no longer more talented than everyone else. For years, because the U.S. stressed girls and women's sports and provided quite a bit of financial support, we were way ahead of others. Soccer was still an expensive and luxury sport which is why those early WC winning teams were chock full of middle and upper-middle class white gals (soccer moms were important). There wasn't much diversity. Now that more gals are playing, we have talented non-white players, some of whom are better than ones who started on world cup winners. But, the western world and rich Asian world also invests in women's sports. It's not that the rest of the world has caught up. It hasn't. But the wealthier countries in the world, places where women have for the most part similar rights as men, now have good women's teams. But, unlike in men's soccer, some of the poorer parts of the world still have crap teams. Men's soccer has guys from the barrio. Gals from the barrio are still getting knocked up early in life so places with lots of barrios don't have good women's teams.
I don't know about the current composition of this team, but prior teams had some pretty unlikeable, pretty vocal players. Rapinoe (sp?) was probably responsible for the vast majority of it. Just whiny and entitled and bitter. Not sure anybody else would have even registered as unlikeable if the whole team image hadn't sort of been tainted by her among "fans" that only have a passing familiarity with the team. To a lesser extent, the complaining about equal pay when it was reported that they were paid a higher percentage of revenues than the men and also got additional perks like guaranteed pay and healthcare that the men didn't get also probably annoyed some people, but I'm not sure many people pay attention enough to even be aware of that.There was one other post last night that got locked wanting the US team to lose. Not trying to ruin this thread, but what is the deal with that?
"our problems with class and race are the reasons why other countries have more talent in soccer." I didn't even remotely say that. I actually implied the opposite of that. I said richer countries invest in women's sports now, and have been for a while, so they've caught up and in some cases have surpassed us. We were ahead of everyone else not long ago. Even though we actually have a larger pool of players available, non-whites in particular although they're still largely from better off families, it doesn't matter. Those men's teams from S. America have poor boys playing soccer at an early age. S. American men's teams are good. Those S. American women's teams, with the exception of a couple of them, aren't all that impressive. I didn't say our soccer team has gotten worse either and I actually wrote that some players are better. Other countries, well rich democracies in particular, have just decided to support women's sports more. Women's soccer is a lot more competitive now but it's still behind the degree of competition you see in the men's game because poverty isn't as big of an issue for men. Race and class are actually bigger problems in other countries. The countries with the highest emigration rates where life sucks for people, especially poor, non-white women, aren't the ones doing well in women's soccer. Only Brazil and Columbia rank in the top 25 in women's soccer.That might be the most confusing explanation I've ever heard in my life for why our soccer team has gotten worse. our problems with class and race are the reasons why other countries have more talent in soccer.
SMH
I read it differently. I see that now through my sleepy eyes. It still confuses me that they supposed to be one of the more talented teams, but they aren't playing like they are. They are getting shown up by other teams that are supposedly much less talented than they are. In the first half last night it looked like they had never played with the other before the opening whistle of that game."our problems with class and race are the reasons why other countries have more talent in soccer." I didn't even remotely say that. I actually implied the opposite of that. I said richer countries invest in women's sports now, and have been for a while, so they've caught up and in some cases have surpassed us. We were ahead of everyone else not long ago. Even though we actually have a larger pool of players available, non-whites in particular although they're still largely from better off families, it doesn't matter. Those men's teams from S. America have poor boys playing soccer at an early age. S. American men's teams are good. Those S. American women's teams, with the exception of a couple of them, aren't all that impressive. I didn't say our soccer team has gotten worse either and I actually wrote that some players are better. Other countries, well rich democracies in particular, have just decided to support women's sports more. Women's soccer is a lot more competitive now but it's still behind the degree of competition you see in the men's game because poverty isn't as big of an issue for men. Race and class are actually bigger problems in other countries. The countries with the highest emigration rates where life sucks for people, especially poor, non-white women, aren't the ones doing well in women's soccer.
On the bright side, now men who identify as women can choose to become equally as pregnant as those in the barrios that really do get knocked uphave the same excuses, and yet still be a man!!!We're just no longer more talented than everyone else. For years, because the U.S. stressed girls and women's sports and provided quite a bit of financial support, we were way ahead of others. Soccer was still an expensive and luxury sport which is why those early WC winning teams were chock full of middle and upper-middle class white gals (soccer moms were important). There wasn't much diversity. Now that more gals are playing, we have talented non-white players, some of whom are better than ones who started on world cup winners. But, the western world and rich Asian world also invests in women's sports. It's not that the rest of the world has caught up. It hasn't. But the wealthier countries in the world, places where women have for the most part similar rights as men, now have good women's teams. But, unlike in men's soccer, some of the poorer parts of the world still have crap teams. Men's soccer has guys from the barrio. Gals from the barrio are still getting knocked up early in life so places with lots of barrios don't have good women's teams.
Wat?We're just no longer more talented than everyone else. For years, because the U.S. stressed girls and women's sports and provided quite a bit of financial support, we were way ahead of others. Soccer was still an expensive and luxury sport which is why those early WC winning teams were chock full of middle and upper-middle class white gals (soccer moms were important). There wasn't much diversity. Now that more gals are playing, we have talented non-white players, some of whom are better than ones who started on world cup winners. But, the western world and rich Asian world also invests in women's sports. It's not that the rest of the world has caught up. It hasn't. But the wealthier countries in the world, places where women have for the most part similar rights as men, now have good women's teams. But, unlike in men's soccer, some of the poorer parts of the world still have crap teams. Men's soccer has guys from the barrio. Gals from the barrio are still getting knocked up early in life so places with lots of barrios don't have good women's teams.
I’m thinking 3-1 Sweden. But it might get ugly.Underwhelming and seem to be more interested in off the field activities versus on the field. Sweden by 2.
We won't score, 4-0.I’m thinking 3-1 Sweden. But it might get ugly.
You have to follow the trail all the way down to the ground level and to ODP camps. I have seen coaches advise players not to even attend anymore due to the bs that goes on. Visit a regional ODP camp and watch when the top 20 cut happens and you'll ask yourself how in the Hell did so and so make it. Some states/clubs have a lot of pull which leaves a great deal of talent out or switching to other sports.Too much money not to mention coaches jobs on the line to let political views get in the way. I call shenanigans
Haha US goes home. Embarrassing0-0 after extra time. About to start penalty kicks.
To be fair, that Swedish GK had the game of her life. She was easily the player of the game. This was the best game the US played all tournament, but she shut them down.Glad I did not get up at 4 o'clock. I turned on just in time to see them give the game to Sweden.
Over 230 minutes without scoring a goal.
They got their commercial money.