I have 0 idea who has or hasnt weighed in on Tucker's Russia trip, I want that to be clear. I havent read, heard, or watched lefty media losing their minds over it, and that is simply because I havent looked for opinions on the matter.
You think our border is wide open and we get $0 funding? I mean, neither of those is even remotely correct.
Not only is the border wide open but Biden just sued Texas for trying to close the border , don’t you follow the news ? What % of Schumer’s bill went for our own border compared to Israel and Ukraine’s ?
All you need to do is to convince Millions of Americans to work low paying jobs in Rural America.
I don't really know what you're intending this phrase to mean, especially in the context of foreign policy, but for some reason half the time when I read it my first thought is to lay off Jimmy and let the dead rest in peace, and half the time my first thought is that Warren Buffet is something of an *** hole but I'm not sure how he has messed up Christianity.
I see you major in whataboutism (this is not a particularly good attempt at that by the way; I can tell you are an undergrad), and I can't see how Gaza relates, beyond Hamas being bolstered by Iran and guess who...OK, I'll tell you: Russia!
This might help you...if you read it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ameri...First Committee (AFC,450 chapters at its peak.
Are you voting out the Republicans who have turned against their own immigration bill because Trump wants to keep the border as an election issue? I've never seen a weaker collective of "alphas"...
This is a great resource: https://www.politifact.com/personalities/tucker-carlson/
It's funny how Biden never had a problem with immigration for three years, and now it is a problem, along with the Ukraine and whatever pork is thrown through on the bill. I have a feeling if I had the Bill was just about immigration, it would pass today.
At this point, you can't actually be serious. It would be easy to check and see that we are turning away more illegals at the border than ever before. It would be just as to see that we are seeing more people at the border than every before, so it's like it correlates and stuff. Illegals get debit cards? Interesting. I guess they vote too? I mean, I've never been to vote anywhere that they didn't verify that I was a registered voter in the precinct, with ID, but somewhere, because my sources tell me, there are hoards of illegals voting in polling locations that are overseen by both Republicans and Democrats who are somehow in collusion to let those illegals vote. How else can I explain that Trump lost by a landslide and even lost the race in places that other Republicans won? There's some kind of very complex 3D chess going on here and I'm deathly afraid of it even though it makes no sense, there's no truth in it and I can't explain it. Trump said it is true so it doesn't have to be logical or make any sense. In fact screw Occam and his stupid Razor!
Ok fella, I don't really feel like getting into a debate over semantic distinction, so lets just assume I meant to say "It has become much dumber".
Universities are filled with these. "Those who can't do, teach"
More fever dreams. Republicans haven't turned against their own immigration bill. A nominally republican senator "negotiated" a deal that didn't do much that is meaningful to restrict illegal immigration.
By what I consider some pretty reputable sources, including some Republican lawmakers it was a very strong bill. Then Trump started making calls to get it stopped and my old party cowed down yet again. I hope there is a book written some day that tells the full sad story about how a lifelong Democrat and con man took over the Republican party. It is a great mystery.
If the issue is so dire, and this latest bill is so worthless, I would think Republicans in the House would pass their own bill. Then they could say 'look at what we are actively doing to help America. Will the Senate and President choose to help America?', but they wont do that.
Considering how confidently you proclaimed that Trump was convicted of sexual assault, I would question who you think of as reputable sources.
They should but that would be just a symbolic gesture. Not against symbolic gestures from legislators but there's only so much they can do as the majority party in one branch of the legislative branch. I get them not wasting the time on it. Again, it's hard to force the executive to do anything. It'd be nice if we had the type of politicians that took their oaths seriously and respected separation of powers, but the executive can more or less declare open borders by default.
It's a sweet gig right? You make money teaching and then you get money for researching then you consult and write a book all without any real world experience.****
After the fall of the USSR, when discussing the issue of a reunified Germany, "we" (US James Baker) gave assurance to Gorbachev that NATO wouldn't expand "one inch to the east". receipt here, go to page 6 second paragraph. yet when you look at the eastern Europe NATO map today, they have pushed way more than an inch. Would you trust someone that told you X and did the opposite, is that proper 'adulting'?
