During his time here, where would we be, or what would we have done without him?
Must have been the best we had.
He's a keeper.
Must have been the best we had.
He's a keeper.
He’s probably the 4th best qb we’ve had since 1980T&L show today took a look back at Will Rogers and his career. Specifically how he stands to statistically be one of the best QBs in State history and a very good SEC QB but does not get the recognition he deserves even among many state fans.
So how does the pack sees Will Rogers? All opinions welcome. Here is mine.
I'm kind of on the fence. My assessment is he is a good solid QB but not a great one. I think his numbers are inflated by scheme and longevity. To me he is best characterized as kind of a dichotomy of doing some things above average and some below. What he does very well is make good reads and consistently throw the football with a high degree of accuracy within a limited range if given a fairly clean pocket. This has served him pretty well for multiple years. But what he does not do well is throw vertically or make plays with his feet. He still tends to roll into an approaching outside rush instead of stepping up in the pocket and then his instinct is often to turn his back and run backward to escape pressure. I'd put him way below Dak and maybe a couple of other former QBs but definitely in the top 5.
He did and like mentioned he owes Charlton a steak dinner every week for bailing his butt out. Had his fumble late in the game cost us the game we would be talking about Parsons non stop in here.Will did something last season that Dak never did. Win the Egg Bowl as a starting quarterback.
I don’t know where he ranks in Msstate history as far as QBs go, but I DO know he is the most unathletic QB we have had since Matt Wyatt.T&L show today took a look back at Will Rogers and his career. Specifically how he stands to statistically be one of the best QBs in State history and a very good SEC QB but does not get the recognition he deserves even among many state fans.
So how does the pack sees Will Rogers? All opinions welcome. Here is mine.
I'm kind of on the fence. My assessment is he is a good solid QB but not a great one. I think his numbers are inflated by scheme and longevity. To me he is best characterized as kind of a dichotomy of doing some things above average and some below. What he does very well is make good reads and consistently throw the football with a high degree of accuracy within a limited range if given a fairly clean pocket. This has served him pretty well for multiple years. But what he does not do well is throw vertically or make plays with his feet. He still tends to roll into an approaching outside rush instead of stepping up in the pocket and then his instinct is often to turn his back and run backward to escape pressure. I'd put him way below Dak and maybe a couple of other former QBs but definitely in the top 5.
"I was at the 2021 Auburn game and I don’t think I’ve ever seen one of our QB’s totally command thegame2nd half like Will did that day."
There, that's the way I think it really happened cause we were "perty turrible" the 1st half
Fitz was elite as a runner though. If Rogers was elite as a thrower, he’d be ahead of Fitz easily as elite as a thrower is better for QB.I won't argue too much about Fitz's standing as a QB - I loved the guy and loved watching him play. But he was very limited as a passer. He struggled just as much against good defenses as Rogers does, for different reasons.
Rogers can't run, Fitz couldn't pass it well. Dak could do both, which is why he's the clear #1 and everyone else is muddled together. Personally, I think Rogers is a better QB than Fitz but we'll see how it all comes out this year.
Here is the thing about Rogers IMHO... He is a good QB. He played in a system that was tailored to his strengths and put up very solid numbers. His overall numbers are inflated due to the overall philosophy of the offense. If you were to remove around 1000 yards a season from his stats due to those 1000 yards were basically running plays, then his true effectiveness is clearer. This season is going to be very telling. If he comes out and throws for 3700 yards this season.... then it helps his overall legacy.T&L show today took a look back at Will Rogers and his career. Specifically how he stands to statistically be one of the best QBs in State history and a very good SEC QB but does not get the recognition he deserves even among many state fans.
So how does the pack sees Will Rogers? All opinions welcome. Here is mine.
I'm kind of on the fence. My assessment is he is a good solid QB but not a great one. I think his numbers are inflated by scheme and longevity. To me he is best characterized as kind of a dichotomy of doing some things above average and some below. What he does very well is make good reads and consistently throw the football with a high degree of accuracy within a limited range if given a fairly clean pocket. This has served him pretty well for multiple years. But what he does not do well is throw vertically or make plays with his feet. He still tends to roll into an approaching outside rush instead of stepping up in the pocket and then his instinct is often to turn his back and run backward to escape pressure. I'd put him way below Dak and maybe a couple of other former QBs but definitely in the top 5.
If Tyler Russell played in Leach's system, he would have had the SEC record easily in 4 years. Mike Henig too.I don’t care what scheme you play in, if you finish your career as the all time or top 2 leading passer in conference history, you’re a dude. When we were running the air raid, we said it wouldn’t work because the defenses in the SEC were too good. Now we say that his stats are inflated because of the offense. Before last season, I couldn’t confidently point to a game and say that we lost because of QB play. Will is top 5 in MSU history.
I see we got a tommy stevens fan here
Disagree, I think Fant and Russell could have put up similar numbers.He’s better than Fant, York, Lee, Henig, Carroll, Connor, Rutland, Thompson, Costello, Russell. That’s all I got
What?Well, his leading returning target is a 5'8" RB and he's surrounded by a bunch of 5'8 - 5'9" WR's. (Walley is the giant of the bunch 5'11"). I think this is the year.
He' also got to rid himself of "fumble-itis."His book isn't completely written yet. This season will go a long way towards defining his legacy. A couple of things:
- Physically, he isn't very imposing, so he's already behind the 8-ball as far as what the sheep are going to think;
- He's very accurate, that's his strong suit;
- He's got presence, and people like that tend to find themselves in good situations, such as him walking into a situation as a freshman that led to him starting for 4 years.
He's an average QB so far. To be remembered as more than that, he has to take a jump. Sometimes he holds on to the ball too long, and we know his arm limitations. To me, he's got to adopt the Brady/Brees style - drop back, throw the ball quickly and accurately, no screwing around. He will have the line to protect him this year, so it's got to happen now.
Will is a better QB than I give him credit for. He should win more and has passed for more than any other MSU QB. The passing is a low bar, and will be looked at better as the future goes by.T&L show today took a look back at Will Rogers and his career. Specifically how he stands to statistically be one of the best QBs in State history and a very good SEC QB but does not get the recognition he deserves even among many state fans.
So how does the pack sees Will Rogers? All opinions welcome. Here is mine.
I'm kind of on the fence. My assessment is he is a good solid QB but not a great one. I think his numbers are inflated by scheme and longevity. To me he is best characterized as kind of a dichotomy of doing some things above average and some below. What he does very well is make good reads and consistently throw the football with a high degree of accuracy within a limited range if given a fairly clean pocket. This has served him pretty well for multiple years. But what he does not do well is throw vertically or make plays with his feet. He still tends to roll into an approaching outside rush instead of stepping up in the pocket and then his instinct is often to turn his back and run backward to escape pressure. I'd put him way below Dak and maybe a couple of other former QBs but definitely in the top 5.
Rogers is a better overall QB than Fitz. Fitz was way better at being a QB in Mullen's system and being an overall better athlete.Ya'll done bumped your heads talking about Rogers being tied with Fitzgerald. That might happen this year if he makes that jump, but that hasn't happened yet. Ya'll forget the trend of improvement in the last half of 2016, then how good we really were in 2017 and 2018. Had Mullen not bolted we win that Egg Bowl and are in the Citrus Bowl, and we'll just never know about 2018, maybe SEC champions.
Then you have the fact that he came back from that ankle injury. Demolished Ole Miss twice, beat #4 A&M, nearly beat Bama, etc. I am hoping that we rise to that level this season with all our returners but the program then was a step above the program now.
I agree with many of your sentiments, but based on MSU history at QB, who could you put him behind other than Dak?T&L show today took a look back at Will Rogers and his career. Specifically how he stands to statistically be one of the best QBs in State history and a very good SEC QB but does not get the recognition he deserves even among many state fans.
So how does the pack sees Will Rogers? All opinions welcome. Here is mine.
I'm kind of on the fence. My assessment is he is a good solid QB but not a great one. I think his numbers are inflated by scheme and longevity. To me he is best characterized as kind of a dichotomy of doing some things above average and some below. What he does very well is make good reads and consistently throw the football with a high degree of accuracy within a limited range if given a fairly clean pocket. This has served him pretty well for multiple years. But what he does not do well is throw vertically or make plays with his feet. He still tends to roll into an approaching outside rush instead of stepping up in the pocket and then his instinct is often to turn his back and run backward to escape pressure. I'd put him way below Dak and maybe a couple of other former QBs but definitely in the top 5.
Fitz carried the teams he played on. So far, Rogers has sort of been in 'ride-along' mode. I don't care about 9 wins (that includes an arbitrary bowl). Those 2017 and 2018 teams would have smashed our 2021 and 2022 teams.Rogers is a better overall QB than Fitz. Fitz was way better at being a QB in Mullen's system and being an overall better athlete.
Did Fitz ever win 9 games? I don't remember, but I don't think he did.
That's the problem. Production from the position at MSU has been mainly been running. We don't need a running back under center.Fitz carried the teams he played on. So far, Rogers has sort of been in 'ride-along' mode. I don't care about 9 wins (that includes an arbitrary bowl). Those 2017 and 2018 teams would have smashed our 2021 and 2022 teams.
Did I mention he's the SEC's all-time leading rusher?
I don't care about anyone's definition of a QB. I'm talking about production from the position at MSU.
Like I said, ya'll done bumped yo heads.
Then good for them!If Tyler Russell played in Leach's system, he would have had the SEC record easily in 4 years. Mike Henig too.
That is not what I said, and that was not my argument. You are arguing with a point that doesn’t exist.That's the problem. Production from the position at MSU has been mainly been running. We don't need a running back under center.
This is the era of the offense. If you can't pass you aren't going to win. There are 50+ teams each year that pass for more than 3000 yards. We have four 3000 yard passers (Dak and Will twice each) in our HISTORY.
Doesn't mean we can't have another guy like a Dak or a better Fitz that can run and pass. But to be relevant in this era of football, you HAVE to have a guy that throws the ball.
It is freaking 2023 and we still have a segment of the fanbase that is just fine with caveman football. Danny Two Gloves got the most he could out of Fitz and Relf and that was very respectable. But we don't need any more projects at the QB position. We've come too far to go back to same ol MSU.
The best receivers Rogers had was Polk. As explosive as Rara was, he dropped a lot of passes. I hope someone steps up big time for Rogers this year. Dan did well getting QB's to excel.
If he struggles this year then one can argue he was indeed just a good system qb. Still a very good career but not top tier overall.
They wouldn't be top tier either. Good tho for what we were running. But not good enough to adjust as you said.Every QB plays in a system. You can't pick Relf or Fitz if that's your criteria, because they would have been disasters in any pass heavy system.
You mean that one-hit wonder guy??No love for the SEC’s all time single game passer in history?
Honestly let me freeze that game and relive it for a while. I did watch it 3 times after it was over.No love for the SEC’s all time single game passer in history?
WTF does 'ride-along' mode mean?Fitz carried the teams he played on. So far, Rogers has sort of been in 'ride-along' mode. I don't care about 9 wins (that includes an arbitrary bowl). Those 2017 and 2018 teams would have smashed our 2021 and 2022 teams.
Did I mention he's the SEC's all-time leading rusher?
I don't care about anyone's definition of a QB. I'm talking about production from the position at MSU.
Like I said, ya'll done bumped yo heads.