Man, everybody on here is way more down on Arnett than I am. My biggest beef with Arnette is that he's done a ****** job. If he gets his **** enough to get to 7-5, even if it looks messy, I would think that would be showing enough improvement that you could chalk up a lot of stuff to making some rookie mistakes and struggling to adjust. And that's ignoring the fact that just as a practical matter, we're not firing a first year coach that goes 7-5, no matter how ****** it looks.
I think that same principle applies at 6-6, although we can get to 6-6 and me still feel awful about the coaching job he has done and not feel good about his ability to bounce back next year. If he beats USM handily and we are close in the remaining 3 games and only lose 2 of them because of talent issues and not brain farts by the coaching staff, I will be ok with keeping him.
What I am expecting to happen is that somebody pulls an arkansas and manages to want to lose worse than we do, we beat USM handily, and then get beat handily by the remaining two (presumably A&M and UM). At that point I think he stays and it will probably be a bad thing.
I think that same principle applies at 6-6, although we can get to 6-6 and me still feel awful about the coaching job he has done and not feel good about his ability to bounce back next year. If he beats USM handily and we are close in the remaining 3 games and only lose 2 of them because of talent issues and not brain farts by the coaching staff, I will be ok with keeping him.
What I am expecting to happen is that somebody pulls an arkansas and manages to want to lose worse than we do, we beat USM handily, and then get beat handily by the remaining two (presumably A&M and UM). At that point I think he stays and it will probably be a bad thing.