What was your initial thought on the Lebby hire?

Nov 29, 2017
713
224
43
Was very disappointed. Thought we were gonna pull off something big , as in a proven HEAD COACH. I think I remember them saying Sumrall was the second choice. He would have been way better.
 

ZombieKissinger

Well-known member
May 29, 2013
3,537
4,656
113
Wasn’t thrilled but got on board quickly because the “I hope this works out”/optimistic mindset seemed drastically less miserable of an existence than the “I was right/see, I told you so” mindset
 
  • Like
Reactions: msstatelp1

Dawg1976

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2012
7,332
1,654
113
Seemed lazy but his track record was solid. I didn't hate it. The problem is if you take a chance on a coordinator, you better surround him with experience. We didn't do that.
Agree. I was hopefully it would be closer to a Mullen hire. Right now not looking good but it is still early.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2022
7,173
10,632
113
Cignetti was my preferred choice and then I would’ve preferred Lashlee or Chadwell if they had been interested. Lebby was maybe a 4th or 5th option. I liked him better than defensive head coaches like Sumrall and Odom but now concede I may have been wrong on that.

Was intrigued by his ceiling but cautious because of lack of experience. When he put together his staff I became more uneasy.
 
Oct 5, 2024
41
53
18
My initial thought. WHY? Being jaded by a very long time of us hiring coaches. Hiring Felker, Croom and Moorhead. Thought also Lebby hiring his buddy. Also why not a proven head coach, somebody with a history, something to prove, had connections for staff and was a harda&&.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muttley and patdog

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
12,576
6,027
113
Excited until I saw the staff he put together.
Same here. Our inexperienced AD hired an inexperienced head Coach that hired inexperienced staff. Notice a trend?
Human Resources Data GIF by Biteable
 

8dog

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2008
12,586
3,564
113
Loved it. Good offensive mind (which I still think he is and showed that). Been in the sec and at a blue blood. Just don’t know he didn’t know how to do anything besides move the FB.
 

Maroon Eagle

Well-known member
May 24, 2006
16,729
5,845
102
Same here. Lazy hire, crony hire, and we needed an experienced head coach not a coordinator gamble because we were in a very precarious situation with our football program.
Exactly. The DC hire concerned me even more— and with good reason.

less miserable of an existence than the “I was right/see, I told you so” mindset

My default setting right here.

While I hoped for 5-7, my worst case scenario was 2-10 (the bare minimum floor) and we got there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

msstatelp1

Well-known member
Aug 21, 2012
1,745
555
113
Do we really know how many other options we had? I know names were thrown out there but how many looked at our situation and turned us down?

basically referring to getting an experienced head coach vs a coordinator
 

Curby

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2012
1,090
732
113
Lebby's redzone offense has proven to be suspect.

How many time we came up empty or FG in the redzone.

The goal line stand by ole ms was the perfectly sh#tty end to the season
 

JoeSchmedlap

New member
May 28, 2023
19
22
3
Like many others, I hoped for an experienced head coach. When our geeen AD hired an Oklahoma OC whom he knew personally, I was wary of this being a lazy hire but I hoped for the best. After all, Mullen worked out well. When we failed to hire an experienced DC, I sharted my pants. A brand new head coach who was purely an offensive minded guy desperately needed an experienced DC. This is the SEC, defense is NOT optional like in the Big 12. Some adults in the room needed to guide the hire of the DC. They didn’t, and now we have a program that sucks to high heaven and might possibly struggle against lots of high school programs where I live.
 

Duggar Hall Desk

Active member
Mar 2, 2008
795
400
63
Cautious optimism. Hiring an OC worked with Mullen but not with Moorhead. It was a roll of the dice. I also didn't expect to lose virtually every offensive and defensive starter. My optimism for any kind of "good" season crashed. Brand new coaching staff with brand new roster = pain.
 

Ozarkdawg

Active member
Apr 1, 2017
585
375
63
Under-whelmed, but hopeful.

Then the assistant hiring's started and hope took a few steps back.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,725
8,238
113
Knew it would be terrible, and it’s documented very well on this board.

Also knew the Selmon hire was not a good one.

But I knew we had serious problems well before that. It’s the main reason Cohen left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

GloryDawg

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2005
15,235
6,493
113
I never put much thought into it. You never know until they coach a game. Right now, I don't feel good about him and Selmon as far as that goes. One thing anytime I am negative I hope I am wrong and would proudly come on here and say I am wrong. They are going to have to prove me wrong. I worry about Selmon hiring coaches. I am worried he will go the buddy route. I really hope I am wrong.
 

Ranchdawg

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2012
3,333
2,503
113
Disappointed we didn't hire a winning head coach from a P5 or even a G5 program but glad we didn't hire a defensive coordinator. Then we hired a position coach for DC and hope left the building. Every good Head Coach that moved from OC to HC understand s the importance of hiring a strong DC to shore up their coaching weaknesses.
 

was21

Active member
May 29, 2007
9,692
405
83
Sumrall may have left first chance. He's about
Was very disappointed. Thought we were gonna pull off something big , as in a proven HEAD COACH. I think I remember them saying Sumrall was the second choice. He would have been way better

Disappointed we didn't hire a winning head coach from a P5 or even a G5 program but glad we didn't hire a defensive coordinator. Then we hired a position coach for DC and hope left the building. Every good Head Coach that moved from OC to HC understand s the importance of hiring a strong DC to shore up their coaching weaknesses.
Agreed. OTOH Mullen didn't hire a strong DC to begin with but he didn't last long....he was gone after the first year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranchdawg

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
49,746
14,323
113
Same here. Our inexperienced AD hired an inexperienced head Coach that hired inexperienced staff. Notice a trend?
Human Resources Data GIF by Biteable
Right after we fired an inexperienced coach & an inexperienced staff. We just blindly repeated our mistakes. And honestly got what we deserve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeSchmedlap

Dawgbite

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2011
6,527
5,240
113
Lazy hire. We couldn’t afford to take a chance on a coordinator and fail. He may ultimately work out but his first year was a major bust and year two is going to be an uphill struggle.
 

The Peeper

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
12,576
6,027
113
But I knew we had serious problems well before that. It’s the main reason Cohen left.
Cohen left because he had a bunch of good ole boys around here telling him what to do, as well as his wife. He went to Auburn (close to home) and still has his wife and good ole boys telling him what you do but he's making more money being told what to do. Plus over there people weren't tired of his sh it like they were here. It won't take long there for them to get tired of him but in the mean time he's adding another mil or two per year which adds up over a few years till they run him off too
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

Perd Hapley

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
3,946
4,223
113
Thought he was not overly impressive but was about as good as we were going to get….knew we had zero chance of landing a proven sitting HC (unless it was the Troy guy who was not that proven).

It didn’t work. Will probably have to gamble on another coordinator for the replacement, unless we luck into Gundy or someone like that.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login