Where does Penn State rank in the first College Football Playoff Poll for 2023?

[RyanSnyder]

Where does Penn State rank in the first College Football Playoff Poll for 2023?

The first College Football Playoff Poll for the 2023 season was released Tuesday evening. Where does Penn State rank? Learn more right here.

www.on3.com

 

[RyanSnyder]

College Football Playoff Poll – Oct. 31​

1) Ohio State
2) Georgia
3) Michigan
4) Florida State
5) Washington
6) Oregon
7) Texas
8) Alabama
9) Oklahoma
10) Ole Miss
11) Penn State
12) Missouri
13) Louisville
14) LSU
15) Notre Dame
16) Oregon State
17) Tennessee
18) Utah
19) UCLA
20) USC
21) Kansas
22) Oklahoma State
23) Kansas State
24) Tulane
25) Air Force

 

[kgilbert78]

Sounds about right.

 

[Bvillebaron]

Sounds about right.

Agreed.

 

[LB99]

Maryland, Maryland, Maryland.

 

[Mufasa94]

Disagree. What’s with all the love for the Big 12 teams?

 

[LB99]

This is all just click bait for the talking heads. It’s way too early. Many of those teams will play each other and it will all sort itself out. The only one that may have a free pass to the final top 4 is FSU because the ACC is hot garbage.

 

[Ludd]

My only concern with it is we’ve been hearing all year how down the SEC is yet five of the top 15 teams are SEC schools….even when they’re down, they still get the nod.

 

[Calabrin]

We’re more like #17.

 

[Bvillebaron]

This is all just click bait for the talking heads. It’s way too early. Many of those teams will play each other and it will all sort itself out. The only one that may have a free pass to the final top 4 is FSU because the ACC is hot garbage.

yep

 

[PSUJam]

College Football Playoff Poll – Oct. 31​

1) Ohio State
2) Georgia
3) Michigan
4) Florida State
5) Washington
6) Oregon
7) Texas
8) Alabama
9) Oklahoma
10) Ole Miss
11) Penn State
12) Missouri
13) Louisville
14) LSU
15) Notre Dame
16) Oregon State
17) Tennessee
18) Utah
19) UCLA
20) USC
21) Kansas
22) Oklahoma State
23) Kansas State
24) Tulane
25) Air Force

 

[Nitt1300]

We’re more like #17.

no, we're not