How many on here have actually watched a WNBA game? I've never watched one single minute of any game.
I know looking at this the WNBA is another entitlement league supported by the NBA and BLM. Give'm time and sooner or later with the support for NBA dieing every year the WNBA will also be extinct in five to ten years. Just like any business venture sooner or later if the numbers don't add up with fans in the stands, parking revenue, concession stand revenue the doors will close. The NBA and BLM movement policies will catch up with them sooner or later. Just like in life when you have your monthly paychecks and your bills exceed your paychecks, then like a lot of citizens they file bankruptcy. If you watch a WNBA game look at the number of fans in the stands. Paying the power bill, people who support the arenas like security and people who help with fans with seating and people working concessions, well those expenses exceed the revenue generated. The WNBA will not exist in 10 years. Mark my words.I also never have, but I don't watch women's basketball at all. Just doesn't interest me. Not many people do. The games draw around 3,000 fans and a bit more than 300,000 watch on tv.
To be honest, I'm not sure what the point is of the WNBA. It's 25 years old and has never come anywhere close to breaking even, must less being profitable. The WNBA will never be profitable. Ever. From a business perspective, there's zero reason to keep it around. If not for the NBA's ridiculous revenue of $8 billion/year that allows them throw chump change at the WNBA to keep it afloat, it would have long since ceased to exist. But it's more of a social statement than a serious sports league or revenue-generating endeavor.
I know looking at this the WNBA is another entitlement league supported by the NBA and BLM. Give'm time and sooner or later with the support for NBA dieing every year the WNBA will also be extinct in five to ten years. Just like any business venture sooner or later if the numbers don't add up with fans in the stands, parking revenue, concession stand revenue the doors will close. The NBA and BLM movement policies will catch up with them sooner or later. Just like in life when you have your monthly paychecks and your bills exceed your paychecks, then like a lot of citizens they file bankruptcy. If you watch a WNBA game look at the number of fans in the stands. Paying the power bill, people who support the arenas like security and people who help with fans with seating and people working concessions, well those expenses exceed the revenue generated. The WNBA will not exist in 10 years. Mark my words.
the 2021 WNBA playoffs averaged 367,000 viewers, the 2022 NCAA women's tournament averaged 634,000 viewers, yes the WNBA is a failed revenue losing joke league, now with the NIL deals there is no benefit of going pro early from college. without NBA generous funding and bail out WNBA would be toast
What would happen to college WBB if the WNBA closes? Bigger emphasis on college WBB and a bigger impact of NIL?
I usually watch televised USC games and no other schools or pro teams. For fun and entertainment. It’s more fun when we win. Football comes first.I only watch women's sports if the Gamecocks are involved. Let's face it, men's sports are more exhilarating, physically dynamic, faster paced, and more interesting to watch.
College women's bball players are second only to Football in NIL compensations. They outperform the Men in this area. There was a report highlighting this recently on ESPN as most of the women have more social media followers and are more technologically engaged than the male players. Good to have correct information sometimes instead of long standing stereotypical opinions. .Maybe more NIL money, but I can't imagine there's much NIL money out there for women's players. Women's basketball just isn't marketable.
I don't know that it would make much of a difference, to be honest. Women's college basketball would probably remain at the same level of popularity.
College women's bball players are second only to Football in NIL compensations. They outperform the Men in this area. There was a report highlighting this recently on ESPN as most of the women have more social media followers and are more technologically engaged than the male players. Good to have correct information sometimes instead of long standing stereotypical opinions. .
Women's basketball offshore would proliferate further, at least I think it would.. No, I don't follow the WNBA. But I don't follow the NFL, either.What would happen to college WBB if the WNBA closes? Bigger emphasis on college WBB and a bigger impact of NIL?
I think I've seen some of a couple of playoff games - not sure why.
I think the league loses about $10M a year (a tiny amount that is easily subsidized by the NBA which makes billions every year). Even if you just looked at the WNBA as an advertising piece to the NBA, $10M is not a lot to spend. You get more females interested in the sport - which will have net benefits for the NBA. You get to constantly have the product playing throughout the year - be it men's or women's. You have a lot of people employed to put on these games (in the arena and working TV). It's a win-win for everyone.
I only watch women's sports if the Gamecocks are involved. Let's face it, men's sports are more exhilarating, physically dynamic, faster paced, and more interesting to watch.
I usually watch televised USC games and no other schools or pro teams. For fun and entertainment. It’s more fun when we win. Football comes first.
Predates BLM.I know looking at this the WNBA is another entitlement league supported by the NBA and BLM. Give'm time and sooner or later with the support for NBA dieing every year the WNBA will also be extinct in five to ten years. Just like any business venture sooner or later if the numbers don't add up with fans in the stands, parking revenue, concession stand revenue the doors will close. The NBA and BLM movement policies will catch up with them sooner or later. Just like in life when you have your monthly paychecks and your bills exceed your paychecks, then like a lot of citizens they file bankruptcy. If you watch a WNBA game look at the number of fans in the stands. Paying the power bill, people who support the arenas like security and people who help with fans with seating and people working concessions, well those expenses exceed the revenue generated. The WNBA will not exist in 10 years. Mark my words.
Faster-paced is not always appealing. Whether or not something is interesting is also subjective.I only watch women's sports if the Gamecocks are involved. Let's face it, men's sports are more exhilarating, physically dynamic, faster paced, and more interesting to watch.
The MNBA subsidizing/supporting the WNBA provides good publicity for the former.$10 million in losses is a drop in the bucket for the NBA to make up out of their $8 billion revenue, but it's staggering that the league loses $10 million each year when it only generates $60 million. MLS revenue dwarfs the WNBA. Let that sink in. Both leagues began play in 1996. MLS generates nearly 17x more revenue than the WNBA, and the WNBA has been marketed and pushed much more heavily.
I'm not sure how much the WNBA actually contributes to increasing the popularity of the NBA. Probably little, if any. But it's an interesting proposition that the NBA would use the WNBA just to make the men's game more popular.
You are right that it does create jobs. That's probably about the only thing it does.
All this reminds of an old WNBA joke:
Q: What does the highest paid WNBA player make?
A: Sandwiches.
Spoken like a true Gamecock. Passively cheering on even those Gamecock sports of which you have no interest (no sarcasm - I earnestly mean this).I've pretty much whittled it down to only watching our football games. When we were really good at baseball, games weren't televised much at all. Now that they are, we stink. I'd watch our men's basketball games if I had any reason to do so. Even with football, it's not the priority it used to be. Once you have kids, it all takes a backseat. I'll still try to arrange my schedule on Saturdays to catch our games, but we like taking the kids to corn mazes and pumpkin patches etc in October, so a big chunk of football time goes away with that.
I was visiting family last year and they had the women's FF game on, so I saw some of that one. I'm not sure I've ever seen any other of our women's game, or any women's game. I'm glad they're good, though, and Dawn's a good coach.
$10 million in losses is a drop in the bucket for the NBA to make up out of their $8 billion revenue, but it's staggering that the league loses $10 million each year when it only generates $60 million. MLS revenue dwarfs the WNBA. Let that sink in. Both leagues began play in 1996. MLS generates nearly 17x more revenue than the WNBA, and the WNBA has been marketed and pushed much more heavily.
I'm not sure how much the WNBA actually contributes to increasing the popularity of the NBA. Probably little, if any. But it's an interesting proposition that the NBA would use the WNBA just to make the men's game more popular.
You are right that it does create jobs. That's probably about the only thing it does.
All this reminds of an old WNBA joke:
Q: What does the highest paid WNBA player make?
A: Sandwiches.
lol. "It's no surprise that the top men's players don't command a lot of NIL money" even though you wrote previously the men are more marketable than the women.First, the NIL is really all about college football. Having established that fact, the cream of the crop in men's college basketball are there for a year and then gone, which actually detracts substantially from their NIL value, so it's not an apples-to-apples comparison between the men and women at all. It's no surprise then that the top men's players don't command a lot of NIL money. Women's basketball NIL money is not in the same stratosphere as football. But, as you summarized, the NIL money is not about the sport, it's about the social media presence.
Not necessarily. Women's volleyball is much more popular in the US (and growing) than men's. The men's game is too physical and fast and rather boring because of it. The women's game, in contrast, is more centered around the fundamentals and extended rallies are more common. Some make that case about tennis, but I'm not a tennis fan, so I have no clue.I only watch women's sports if the Gamecocks are involved. Let's face it, men's sports are more exhilarating, physically dynamic, faster paced, and more interesting to watch.
Sounds like the women's game is becoming a card shuffle too.Not necessarily. Women's volleyball is much more popular in the US (and growing) than men's. The men's game is too physical and fast and rather boring because of it. The women's game, in contrast, is more centered around the fundamentals and extended rallies are more common. Some make that case about tennis, but I'm not a tennis fan, so I have no clue.
Personally, I've lost interest in the men's college basketball. Players come and go so much, I have no idea who's who any longer. To each his own.
The WNBA is for the women who have a social agenda which to me is sick. Look at Diana Taurasi, Stewart, Sue Bird. All of these and more are part of the sick social agenda and then they want to have a child. Go figure. Do they adopt or go to a sperm bank. I have no idea.I also never have, but I don't watch women's basketball at all. Just doesn't interest me. Not many people do. The games draw around 3,000 fans and a bit more than 300,000 watch on tv.
To be honest, I'm not sure what the point is of the WNBA. It's 25 years old and has never come anywhere close to breaking even, must less being profitable. The WNBA will never be profitable. Ever. From a business perspective, there's zero reason to keep it around. If not for the NBA's ridiculous revenue of $8 billion/year that allows them throw chump change at the WNBA to keep it afloat, it would have long since ceased to exist. But it's more of a social statement than a serious sports league or revenue-generating endeavor.
They're just subsidized by the NBA for political reasons. Same thing with Team USA women's soccer. They get smoked by 14 year old boys in Houston every year and have never been close to profitable but now they get the same pay as the men's team because somehow having the men's team subsidize the women's team wasnt fair to the women. So the men's team has to lose even more now.I also never have, but I don't watch women's basketball at all. Just doesn't interest me. Not many people do. The games draw around 3,000 fans and a bit more than 300,000 watch on tv.
To be honest, I'm not sure what the point is of the WNBA. It's 25 years old and has never come anywhere close to breaking even, must less being profitable. The WNBA will never be profitable. Ever. From a business perspective, there's zero reason to keep it around. If not for the NBA's ridiculous revenue of $8 billion/year that allows them throw chump change at the WNBA to keep it afloat, it would have long since ceased to exist. But it's more of a social statement than a serious sports league or revenue-generating endeavor.
The point of the WNBA is to give little girls an opportunity to play a sport that they love for a living when they grow up. It does not have to always be about the money. It is like some of you'll get offended by the WNBA existence. The good will that it brings outweighs the money loss to a billion-dollar business. I hope it is around for another 25 years.I also never have, but I don't watch women's basketball at all. Just doesn't interest me. Not many people do. The games draw around 3,000 fans and a bit more than 300,000 watch on tv.
To be honest, I'm not sure what the point is of the WNBA. It's 25 years old and has never come anywhere close to breaking even, must less being profitable. The WNBA will never be profitable. Ever. From a business perspective, there's zero reason to keep it around. If not for the NBA's ridiculous revenue of $8 billion/year that allows them throw chump change at the WNBA to keep it afloat, it would have long since ceased to exist. But it's more of a social statement than a serious sports league or revenue-generating endeavor.
The point of the WNBA is to give little girls an opportunity to play a sport that they love for a living when they grow up. It does not have to always be about the money.
Have never watched and the only reason I am aware is because of Aja Wilson.How many on here have actually watched a WNBA game? I've never watched one single minute of any game.
The point of the WNBA is to give little girls an opportunity to play a sport that they love for a living when they grow up. It does not have to always be about the money. It is like some of you'll get offended by the WNBA existence. The good will that it brings outweighs the money loss to a billion-dollar business. I hope it is around for another 25 years.
I watched about 3 minutes.How many on here have actually watched a WNBA game? I've never watched one single minute of any game.