3 by Judge who is NOT using that batSupposedly 9 HR yesterday..
Why not cut that part of the bat down?Rather surprised that bat is legal, but what do I know?
The fat part of the bat is adjusted for each player to match where they most often contact the ball. So, whether they are supposed to use that part of the bat or not, it's the part of the bat that hitter uses.Like Billy Shakespeare said, Much Ado About Nothing. You shouldn't use that part of the bat anyway.
exactly. Isnt much ado about nothing... i expect some sort of parameter to be set for it... might not happen this season due to the fact that the players union is so strong... but its for sure making a difference. Lot of science going into it.The fat part of the bat is adjusted for each player to match where they most often contact the ball. So, whether they are supposed to use that part of the bat or not, it's the part of the bat that hitter uses.
If it was the Detroit Tigers or someone doing it, it wouldn't be.Rather surprised that bat is legal, but what do I know?
I'm not a fan of changing the rules after the season has started, and particularly before we really know how much impact the bats really have. But it could get crazy if the bats take off this season and then get banned.exactly. Isnt much ado about nothing... i expect some sort of parameter to be set for it... might not happen this season due to the fact that the players union is so strong... but its for sure making a difference. Lot of science going into it.
Baseball is and has always been a cat and mouse game, this is one where the hitters snuck the cheese by the mouse.
The criteria for legal is really straightforward. What's shocking is that this is just now becoming a thing.Rather surprised that bat is legal, but what do I know?
yeah thats why i dont think the do anything this season... supposeldy so far all bats are up to teh standards agreed to by MLB and the players union.. so it'll be very difficult to change.I'm not a fan of changing the rules after the season has started, and particularly before we really know how much impact the bats really have. But it could get crazy if the bats take off this season and then get banned.
I'm curious about how the bats affect hits outside the sweet spot? If the bat is fatter where the player usually hits the ball, doesn't it have to be smaller outside that area? Does that mean balls hit off that part of the bat have less chance of turning into hits?
exaclty... some very smart people are figuring out where players make contact with pitches the most.. and designing/custom making bats taylored to the player to make the most explosive part of the wood in that area the player hits it the most... while shaving down other parts of the bat to stay within league specifications.Essentially seems like the same thing as fitted golf clubs. Each player is going to have their bat custom made to their swing. Not sure how you can really prevent it under the current rules. My guess is that any new rule would be something like the bat not being able to taper back down at the end. Has to be same diameter or larger as you go above the handle until you get to the end.
The only real advantage seems to be that balls hit off the end of the bat will not be swing and miss, but you’re not going to get nearly as much force as before on those. Otherwise it would make just as much sense to simply use a shorter bat.
Of course it would be legal.If it was the Detroit Tigers or someone doing it, it wouldn't be.
Rule 3.02(c) Comment (Rule 1.10(c) Comment):
If pine tar extends past the 18-inch limitation, then the umpire, on his own initiative or if alerted by the opposing team, shall order the batter to use a different bat. The batter may use the bat later in the game only if the excess substance is removed. If no Rule 3.02(c) (Rule 1.10(c)) on that play does not nullify any action or play on the field and no protests of such play shall be allowed.
I think the problem is, it won't so much help the batting averages so much as help the home run numbers. So it'll make the game even more unwatchable than it is today.This was all a product of the sad state of the Brewers pitching staff. Is it an improved design? It might be, but we need way more data. My curiosity that, I have not found anywhere, is what the weight difference is between the tapered and non-tapered bat with the same sweet spot barrel size. They already approved the cupped bat many years ago to shave weight. A wood bat by material makeup has limitations to length diameter and weight with the necessary strength to survive. So does this take a 34 / 31 with a 2.5 inch barrel down to a 34 / 29? We know that weight reduction has proven to be a real positive for hitters. The idea that the sweet spot moving (center of mass) I am pretty sure that most people reading all this thinks it is a movement of 2 or 3 inches and I would doubt that can be accomplished. Because then why not just us a 29 or 30 inch bat. That sweet spot will be closer to your hands.
The MLB batting average over the past 25 years has gone from .265 to last years all time low of .238. So if this helps hitters, its good.
Look at the chart in the link. HR numbers haven't changed. You just can't take 4 games as anything in statistical proof.I think the problem is, it won't so much help the batting averages so much as help the home run numbers. So it'll make the game even more unwatchable than it is today.
They have gone up about 20% or so. 8 of the 9 years from 2016-2024 are higher than any year prior to then. I suspect this will make it worse.Look at the chart in the link. HR numbers haven't changed. You just can't take 4 games as anything in statistical proof.
you lose leverage on a 29-30 inch bat.This was all a product of the sad state of the Brewers pitching staff. Is it an improved design? It might be, but we need way more data. My curiosity that, I have not found anywhere, is what the weight difference is between the tapered and non-tapered bat with the same sweet spot barrel size. They already approved the cupped bat many years ago to shave weight. A wood bat by material makeup has limitations to length diameter and weight with the necessary strength to survive. So does this take a 34 / 31 with a 2.5 inch barrel down to a 34 / 29? We know that weight reduction has proven to be a real positive for hitters. The idea that the sweet spot moving (center of mass) I am pretty sure that most people reading all this thinks it is a movement of 2 or 3 inches and I would doubt that can be accomplished. Because then why not just us a 29 or 30 inch bat. That sweet spot will be closer to your hands.
The MLB batting average over the past 25 years has gone from .265 to last years all time low of .238. So if this helps hitters, its good.