And that was what was wrong: what is "boring" about ANY opponent for a team that's been 40-42 over the past 7 seasons, including this one? South Carolina was ONLY 5-2 because of beating teams like Georgia State, Charlotte, and South Carolina State. THOSE teams weren't "boring" enough to keep the team from getting up for them. The Gamecocks came into their game with Missouri 2-2 in conference play, and NO ONE "arrives" anywhere 2-2.
Not saying that the perfect storm you speak of couldn't have very well have happened, but if it did that's a HUGE failure on the coaching staff's part in preparing the team to take each game as important as the most important game on the schedule, because at this stage of climbing out of the hole of mediocrity, each game IS that game.
I have all this memory of losses to Navy, East Carolina etc. where players afterwards admitted they didn't take their opponent seriously enough. That is one of the most South Carolina Gamecocks things about the history of our collegiate sports, especially football. It's where I got a personal issue with it today: PLEASE do NOT tell the public/media about this - just keep it to yourselves in the lockerroom, and privately learn the error in your misjudgements so that you don't have those ever again. It's the coaching staff's responsibility to see to it that the team doesn't. But every time this happens, and a player has to go tell the media "we didn't take them seriously" with the history of OUR program, is so, so sad. Steve Spurrier-level "sad"......