All I’m asking you is to know a little about the athletes you use as straw men/women for your generalizations that’s all.Hey, the transfer system needs work. You know it and I know it. And if it doesn't, the medical redshirt system apparently does. The college experience wasn't intended to be a perpetuity.
Neither do I buy into the notion that scholarship athletes have been at a disadvantage to students in general. Most regular students are neither repeatedly transferring nor cashing in on free everything plus potential fringe benefits with every move.
Let's get some real-world experiential college attendance data together and conform the student-athlete template to that. Whatever the median transfer experience is nationwide, make that the student- athlete limit, irrespective of sitting or not sitting. Don't even bring that into it.
Your whole premise above is bogus. College athletics is a whole different world from the “college experience”. And the schools not the athletes made it this way. Whether we like it or not athletes are commodities. Right now they are in an insane free market.
I will stop there, to go further with you would require alcohol, wings and games on multiple big screens. Not that I am not averse to that occasion
Last edited: