Or because they want to complete for National Merit Finalist spots. Bear in mind that label is from 30 years ago.People don't take the SAT because scholarships are SAT only; they take the SAT because some people do better on the SAT than the ACT.
Or because they want to complete for National Merit Finalist spots. Bear in mind that label is from 30 years ago.People don't take the SAT because scholarships are SAT only; they take the SAT because some people do better on the SAT than the ACT.
To point #1 regarding UT or A&M it really is top 8-10% graduating class or a very good SAT/ACT score. With the population in TX that sends a lot of really good to average students in TX looking for options. Arkansas has really capitalized on it with 80%/70% discount of out of state tuition to neighboring states. So, they get a bunchof TX kids, Ole Miss gets the stereotypical kids who can't get into UT or A&M but parents have $, and Tech and others get the rest.Those are both excellent questions. I will attempt to answer.
1. If we did this, our enrollment would suffer. That's why we need to consider waiving OOS tution for alumni kids, Memphis area and high achieving out of state. Texas and Georgia have unique issues where it iis extremely difficult to get into UTexas and UGA, even as a in-state student. A Dallas or Atlanta area kid with a 4.0+ GPA and a 28 ACT might not get into their state's flagships if they are not in the top 10% of their graduating class. Those kids have to drop to Texas Tech/Texas State level or go private to TCU/SMU/Baylor. Ole Miss becomes a very attractive option to get a big school experience. So don't assume that all of those out of state kids are dumbasses, although they get a share of wealthy out of state kids interested in Greek Life.
2. We've got a lot of debt in the infrastructure, which is probably why we can't do anything drastic to better the student quality. We built a lot of campus on Pell Grants.
Saw this