Not if he was in prisonThis is valid, but if he wanted a gun bad enough he could get one - conviction or no.
Why not just enforce the multitude of laws that exist....convict the villains who perpetrate them...and not waste money on lengthy jurisprudence.This hits way to close to home. Son is undergrad and Masters alum of MSU.
Being a gun owner and worked for the Department of Corrections gun laws need to be passed.
Sadly every day i witness selective enforcement of the law. Recently there was discussion about the lack of law enforcement assisting in safe vehicle operations around our schools.....the sheriff's response was "It isn't his job to protect school student"! Needless to say i was appauled....and am beginning to understand the defund the police movement...when our elected and tax paid officers pick and choose if they want to uphold governing laws...we have a problem.You would think the real effort here is trying to intervene with a mentally unstable individual before it becomes too late. 'Mentally ill' people are prohibited from purchasing/owning firearms in nearly every state. The problem is to be flagged as 'mentally ill', it often requires a court order and/or involuntary commitment. I don't know what the middle ground is, but in Cruz's case, people noted peculiar behavior leading up to his purchase of the rifle he used to kill 17 kids at his school. How do you intervene there? Sadly, as long as guns are available *anywhere* they will continue to be an issue. It's all or nothing and it won't be the former.
Sadly every day i witness selective enforcement of the law. Recently there was discussion about the lack of law enforcement assisting in safe vehicle operations around our schools.....the sheriff's response was "It isn't his job to protect school student"! Needless to say i was appauled....and am beginning to understand the defund the police movement...when our elected and tax paid officers pick and choose if they want to uphold governing laws...we have a problem.
There are many different ways to significantly reduce violent crime in our country. Yes, a national push for gun confiscation is one approach, but trust me, there are other methodologies that would also work. Then the question becomes, at what cost and how far would we as a society be willing to go to stop crimes similar to the Michigan State shooting? You cited Japan as an example? Yikes! It is no surprise why the Japanese have a very low crime rate. Prosecutors get conviction rates that approach 99%, their version of our Justice Department uses draconian measures to intimidate and scare judges into handing out devastating sentences that would be unfathomable in the US.No law is going to get rid of the millions of guns in the US. There's just way too many and they're easy to get both legally and illegally. You either go scorched earth and try to get rid of all or most (like 90%) of guns in the country and make them very difficult to get/own (like Japan) or you live with it. We're gonna have to live (and die) with it.
There are many different ways to significantly reduce violent crime in our country. Yes, a national push for gun confiscation is one approach, but trust me, there are other methodologies that would also work. Then the question becomes, at what cost and how far would we as a society be willing to go to stop crimes similar to the Michigan State shooting? You cited Japan as an example? Yikes! It is no surprise why the Japanese have a very low crime rate. Prosecutors get conviction rates that approach 99%, their version of our Justice Department uses draconian measures to intimidate and scare judges into handing out devastating sentences that would be unfathomable in the US.
True, the cat is out of the bag. But you have to start somewhere.No law is going to get rid of the millions of guns in the US. There's just way too many and they're easy to get both legally and illegally. You either go scorched earth and try to get rid of all or most (like 90%) of guns in the country and make them very difficult to get/own (like Japan) or you live with it. We're gonna have to live (and die) with it.
I bet bad guys still have guns after you steal mine just sayinTrue, the cat is out of the bag. But you have to start somewhere.
There are still too many guns. The US is the only country where there are more guns than people and we have the murder rate to prove it.I bet bad guys still have guns after you steal mine just sayin
How many guns are just the right amount?There are still too many guns. The US is the only country where there are more guns than people and we have the murder rate to prove it.
As an owner of many shotguns and hunting rifles, I'm not getting into this pissing contest for the 5 millionth time here. Just one thing to remember: PSU had the first campus mass shooting since 1966, and it could have been much worse had she been a good shot. I was there in a nearby building studying for the upcoming test and heard what I knew to be gun shots. I took the test for that class not knowing a thing about what happened 100-200 yards away. Campus wasn't the same for quite a while and it will stick with me forever. I can't imagine being a witness or victim to these hundreds of horror stories that have happened since. Everyone still points fingers since this day in 1996 and not a damn thing has worked as a fix. There's one common denominator in all of these horrific acts: firearms that are in the hands of people that are unfit to have firearms. Someone needs to do something starting yesterday.
Witnesses, community members recount Penn State HUB lawn shooting on its 25th anniversary
Waking up on Tuesday, Sept. 17, 1996, many Penn State students went about their day, not knowing the university’s atmosphere would change dramatically when 19-year-old Jillian Robbins opened fire onwww.collegian.psu.edu
Biggest problem with Michigan is that red flag laws were not in acted by the previous legislature that held on to power in Michigan for many years. Now that the other side is in charge maybe this will be changed. As a past and will be a future full time Michigan resident we can only hope.Since honesty is a hallmark of any productive dialog, let’s be honest about a huge contributing factor to this tragedy. This murderer was previously charged with a felony gun charge in 2019 and a conviction would have prevented him from legally owning a firearm in the future. The progressive prosecutor dismissed the slam-dunk felony charge and kept the lessor misdemeanor charge. The gist of her reasoning was based in prison reform ideology and the felony conviction could have meant up to 5 years. So not only did she keep him out of prison, he was subsequently legally allowed to buy the murder weapon.
The law to prevent this is already in place. Inexplicably, and probably unwittingly, people voted for someone who opted not to enforce it.
my guns are all securely locked up when I'm not using themSans the guns part, didn’t you just describe yourself?
Did you buy your box at Dicks? I hope notmy guns are all securely locked up when I'm not using them
The guy was charged with a felony for concealing a legally bought handgun without a license. In fact, when asked if he had one on him he told the officer he did but he didn't have a license to conceal. Do you know how many people are given a slap on the hand for that daily? He plead down to a misdemeanor and almost 2 years probation.As a retired Michigan Department of Corrections employee, this really is disturbing knowing that his convictions were reduced to only probation. Nothing against our field agents but he needed to be locked up and restricted from owning any firearm.
Maybe none, other than used for hunting or police. We have the highest murder rate among imdustrialized countries. But it’s probably too late.How many guns are just the right amount?
For some people (including some who own them)- noneHow many guns are just the right amount?
So freaking dangerousMaybe none, other than used for hunting or police. We have the highest murder rate among imdustrialized countries. But it’s probably too late.
For some people (including some who own them)- none
Some people shouldn't have a car, either.
So take the guns away and the nuts will start making bombs….then do we make all the ingredients you can use to make a bomb illegal? Then we do that and the nuts start using a car or truck to mass kill, then do we make vehicles illegal?Maybe none, other than used for hunting or police. We have the highest murder rate among imdustrialized countries. But it’s probably too late.
So take the guns away and the nuts will start making bombs….then do we make all the ingredients you can use to make a bomb illegal? Then we do that and the nuts start using a car or truck to mass kill, then do we make vehicles illegal?
PA is five years. Vermont doesn't require a license. It's all over the map, literally.You have to renew your driver’s license every five years or so - how often do you have to renew a gun license?
More medicated people…one thing almost all of these mass shooters have in common is they’re on mood altering drugs, but no one seems to worry about that.Trucks and stuff to make bombs exist everywhere. How many bomb and/or truck mass killings are there in our peer countries? If you’re saying America is populated with more crazy people who feel the need to kill innocent people, I’d probably agree.
More medicated people…one thing almost all of these mass shooters have in common is they’re on mood altering drugs, but no one seems to worry about that.
That’s correct, because people will kill. They may stop killing with guns, but they will continue to kill. Look no further than Great Britain. Around 1996(ish) they outlawed 99% of handguns. The laws were punitive and decisive for anyone who got caught carrying one, or if one was found in a home. But if you take a look at the murder rate a year or two after the ban it will prove your point. Here’s a little tidbit, in 2018 the murder rate was dam near identical to 1996.So take the guns away and the nuts will start making bombs….then do we make all the ingredients you can use to make a bomb illegal? Then we do that and the nuts start using a car or truck to mass kill, then do we make vehicles illegal?
We are a REACTIVE SOCIETY
Our LAWS are NOT STRONG ENOUGH ie. Deterrence (How many here drive home with wife after having 3 drinks? Loose license 10yrs that stops)
We are a too FORGIVING SOCIETY
Prisons Should be run in a Military fashion not the way they are today-ie. Draconian
We are 3rd in Population with the Most Diverse backgrounds-hence not everyone rows in the same direction culturally
Too many sources of influence drives behaviors; Music, Social Media, News, Movies, Gaming and already mentioned Drugs
We should bring back Mental hospitals-good ones well funded. Plenty of Sociology, Psyc majors could use a good safe Government job-this will appease the liberals.
It starts with Discipline on all Fronts.
Simple--FACTS not FeelingsThis is part of the reason Japan is so successful - they don’t have or provide the same latitude we do when it comes to breaking the law. People say they use unlawful tactics and coercion but we do too when we want to. They simply don’t give breaks and are to the letter.
Utter nonsense.So take the guns away and the nuts will start making bombs….then do we make all the ingredients you can use to make a bomb illegal? Then we do that and the nuts start using a car or truck to mass kill, then do we make vehicles illegal?
There’s a collage on Reddit that shows 35 different mass shooters and the type of anti-depression meds they are on….I don’t know how to post it on here.I'd have to see some kind of statistics on that. I'll give you mentally ill/crazy thought (because like our friend Yossarian would say, you'd have to be mentally ill to kill innocent people).
Yes because people who are crazy and want to kill others only do it because the gun tells them to do it…it has nothing to do with their mental state. Wonder why the guy that drove through the parade in Wisconsin used a truck and not a gun.Utter nonsense.
More utter nonsense.Yes because people who are crazy and want to kill others only do it because the gun tells them to do it…it has nothing to do with their mental state. Wonder why the guy that drove through the parade in Wisconsin used a truck and not a gun.
Utter nonsense.
and . . . Timothy McVeigh? Boston Marathon bombers? Centennial Olympic Park bombing?Yes because people who are crazy and want to kill others only do it because the gun tells them to do it…it has nothing to do with their mental state. Wonder why the guy that drove through the parade in Wisconsin used a truck and not a gun.