Don't put words in my mouth. Neither of them ever initiated physical contact.You showered alone with your coach and scout leader and he initiated physical contact with you while doing so? If not, we’re not talking about the same things.
Don't put words in my mouth. Neither of them ever initiated physical contact.You showered alone with your coach and scout leader and he initiated physical contact with you while doing so? If not, we’re not talking about the same things.
Then it has nothing to do with what Sandusky did.Don't put words in my mouth. Neither of them ever initiated physical contact.
I didn't say it was. I simply said that back in the day it wasn't unusual for an adult and young person be in a shower together. At no time did I condone sexual assault.Then it has nothing to do with what Sandusky did.
This has been my belief throughout the whole thing. I don’t know if he’s innocent, or guilty, and if guilty what he’s guilty of, BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN SO MUCH EMBELLISHMENT AND HIS LEGAL TEAM DID NO REAL LAWYERING. This, to me, is a huge miscarriage of justice. Not that an innocent man is in jail, or a guilty man wasn’t hammered enough. It’s that the legal system seems to not have operated the way it should have.
My yearning to see this thing done right has everything to do with wanting to regain faith in the legal system.
But try to have that adult conversation around here and I’m a pedophile supporter or a child rapist sympathizer. It’s like trying to tell my kid something and he sticks his fingers in his ears and yells “LALALALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU”….
And of course all of this done while the BOT just rolled over and played dead unknowingly, or knowingly to line the pockets of their friends…..
Tell you what, see all the stories that have happened in other schools since 2011, I can tell you that PSU BOT showed exactly how NOT to do this….
Then again, it’s irrelevant to the discussion of what Sandusky did.I didn't say it was. I simply said that back in the day it wasn't unusual for an adult and young person be in a shower together. At no time did I condone sexual assault.
It's a prime case study in Crisis Management, on the DON'T side of the study.I said this from the beginning. That the PSU BOT reaction to this whole thing will be studied and used as an example for decades especially in business and business schools on how not to handle a hot button issues like this that one may face.
On a parallel note to this, it is a prime case study on getting YOUR side's message out front and center early and often.I said this from the beginning. That the PSU BOT reaction to this whole thing will be studied and used as an example for decades especially in business and business schools on how not to handle a hot button issues like this that one may face.
That is what always made me suspicious of the BOT. You had many heads of very large Fortune companies that literally stuck their head in the sand or tried run away and distance themselves. They all performed the classic CYA so it didn't flow over to their other jobs. So much for their promise to look after the institution that they are serving. Instead they served $$$ up on a silver platter.It's a prime case study in Crisis Management, on the DON'T side of the study.
After Joe,watching what they did to a good man like Tim still troubles me.What gets me maybe more than anything about the prosecution of C/S/S is that everyone knew that Curley went to Rakovitz, the CEO of TSM and a mandated reporter, with what McQ had told him. Rakovitz brushed it off as nothing ('you're crazy') and did not investigate/report as he was mandated to do. So, not only was there no cover-up, there was a verified report made - probably not to the most desired authority, but to someone who should have either taken on that responsibility or re-directed Curley to the right agency.
And then, in yet another bizarro-world happening in all this, Rakovitz testified in the Spanier trial that he was a proper reporting authority, in verifying that Central Mtn. School District reported their JS encounter to him. No one ever questioned why that was a valid report, but Curley's was not. All the info (McQ) and feedback (the '98 report, Rakovitz) they got was that there was nothing to this. I am certain they truly did not know what they were dealing with, and the people who they trusted failed them. And that carries over to JVP as well.
As Curley said post-trial, he wished they had asked more questions. But in real time, they and just about everyone else just could not comprehend what may have been actually happening.
I put most of the blame on Spanier for this. He knew months in advance that Sandusky was being investigated. Given Sandusky's close association with the school he should have been prepared for major schit to hit fan. There is no indication that he sat down with anyone from PSU to review their Grand Jury testimony.On a parallel note to this, it is a prime case study on getting YOUR sides's message out front and center early and often.
The first narrative is very often the one that sticks.
Again, I put this primarily on Spanier. However, he did tell the BoT of the grand Jury investigation, dismissing it as nothing. As you suggest, givedn their standing in the corporate world, a bunch of them should have drummed it into his head long and loud that he needed to prepare for the worst. They didn't, he didn't, and PSU bears the consequences to this day.That is what always made me suspicious of the BOT. You had many heads of very large Fortune companies that literally stuck their head in the sand or tried run away and distance themselves. They all performed the classic CYA so it didn't flow over to their other jobs. So much for their promise to look after the institution that they are serving. Instead they served $$$ up on a silver platter.
I agree with you on this.I put most of the blame on Spanier for this. He knew months in advance that Sandusky was being investigated. Given Sandusky's close association with the school he should have been prepared for major schit to hit fan. There is no indication that he sat down with anyone from PSU to review their Grand Jury testimony.
Again, I put this primarily on Spanier. However, he did tell the BoT of the grand Jury investigation, dismissing it as nothing. As you suggest, givedn their standing in the corporate world, a bunch of them should have drummed it into his head long and loud that he needed to prepare for the worst. They didn't, he didn't, and PSU bears the consequences to this day.
I put most of the blame on Spanier for this. He knew months in advance that Sandusky was being investigated. Given Sandusky's close association with the school he should have been prepared for major schit to hit fan. There is no indication that he sat down with anyone from PSU to review their Grand Jury testimony.
Again, I put this primarily on Spanier. However, he did tell the BoT of the grand Jury investigation, dismissing it as nothing. As you suggest, givedn their standing in the corporate world, a bunch of them should have drummed it into his head long and loud that he needed to prepare for the worst. They didn't, he didn't, and PSU bears the consequences to this day.
Yes, his failure was not in not reporting, but of crisis mgmt. While he tried to get in front of the psu response to the breaking news in November 2011, the bot had already started down the wrong path by delaying any defense of psu. The bot ultimately surrendered without a fight.Agree totally. Spanier also had enough time to come up with multiple plans of action depending which way this thing broke open. Instead they were caught flat footed with the public outrage and had no answers for anyone and that just threw gas on the fire.
I think the chances of MM speaking about anything is exactly 0.0000000000%At some point I would think McQueary will speak about this whole thing. Over ten years removed from it he might be willing to talk.
Follow who has money and it makes 100% senseI agree it's insane that C/S/S were indicted but not Rakovitz (or Dranov).
Sadly juries bought the BSNone of the McQueary story adds up.
Isn’t this “alleged“ physical contact?You showered alone with your coach and scout leader and he initiated physical contact with you while doing so? If not, we’re not talking about the same things.
Also who is a well known and highly respected public figure.Follow who has money and it makes 100% sense![]()
Because none of the attorneys challenged him on the stand, starting with "And why did it take you ten years to come forward?"Sadly juries bought the BS
AS THE PLAYERS SAY
All of the above, plus I will always wonder if he "fell in line" under threat that his father and Dr. D would be indicted.I agree that McQ has little if any credibility - he was not trusted on the staff by many of the assistants and players. However, I think he had no choice except to agree to be a witness based on the 'stuff' they had on him (gambling, photos). Through all that, he was loyal to JVP and did not want to see him or his reputation harmed. When he read the embellished GJ presentation, I think he realized that Joe could look bad, and wanted to clear the record. So, yes, I believe what he wrote to Eschbach (sp) in his note about her embellishment is him being honest and caring about what happened to Joe and others.
Fwiw, just my opinion, but based on some conversations I've had with those close to it.
Not only "brushed it off," but arranged to get Jerry a different workout location at the hotel up the street! LOLWhat gets me maybe more than anything about the prosecution of C/S/S is that everyone knew that Curley went to Rakovitz, the CEO of TSM and a mandated reporter, with what McQ had told him. Rakovitz brushed it off as nothing ('you're crazy') and did not investigate/report as he was mandated to do. So, not only was there no cover-up, there was a verified report made - probably not to the most desired authority, but to someone who should have either taken on that responsibility or re-directed Curley to the right agency.
And then, in yet another bizarro-world happening in all this, Rakovitz testified in the Spanier trial that he was a proper reporting authority, in verifying that Central Mtn. School District reported their JS encounter to him. No one ever questioned why that was a valid report, but Curley's was not. All the info (McQ) and feedback (the '98 report, Rakovitz) they got was that there was nothing to this. I am certain they truly did not know what they were dealing with, and the people who they trusted failed them. And that carries over to JVP as well.
As Curley said post-trial, he wished they had asked more questions. But in real time, they and just about everyone else just could not comprehend what may have been actually happening.
Agreed. Making any sort of suggestion that Jerry was a pedophile at that time was sticky business for anyone, let alone a PSU administrator. When the man who should know best dismissed any concerns, it had to be a relief to Tim. "Case closed!"I think (imo) that's where the Rakovitz piece comes into play and is a key part of why this whole McQ report went south...
C/S didn't know what to do with what McQ told them about JS being in the shower, as the concern over csa didn't come up. So, going to Rakovitz and asking his expert opinion on what he thought, and getting a brushoff in reply, made them think there was no csa involved.
It is generally accepted that the incident in question happened at the end of the day Jerry had interviewed for the Virginia job. He took Alan Meyer (who was living with him) along on the trip. They returned, workout and showered at Lasch.If I may, "back then" the showers with adults were generally with a group and not after hours.
In 2001, why did Sandusky have to bring the kid onto the PSU campus to shower? I've not read of any indication that the activity in which they were engaged took place on campus. Why didn't he simply take the kid home?
I think it's more sinister than this. Let's not forget One Term's role in this. I'd love to see the cell phone records between Corbett and Surma. I'll bet more than 90% of the trustees only knew what Surma told them once the ball started rolling downhill. By that time guys like Frazier had already figured out what they personally could gain (Joyner) or their business interests (Merck).Yes, his failure was not in not reporting, but of crisis mgmt. While he tried to get in front of the psu response to the breaking news in November 2011, the bot had already started down the wrong path by delaying any defense of psu. The bot ultimately surrendered without a fight.
Well, consider how many times Jerry and Dottie must have been "vetted" by social workers or employees of CPS to become foster parents and adoptive parents. No one went after those folks or agencies because there was no $$$ there and no political targets.I still want to know when the teachers, parents, guidance counselors, Second Mile employees, et al whose job it was to look after these young boys every day the original police investigators and DA (well he's probably dead) who dropped the ball are going to get sued or imprisoned for letting JS get away with this?
I don't know about MM's gambling or photo issues but I'm confident that he didn't want to be accused for doing too little to stop JS or for not reporting what he saw to the police. He started to cover his own rear end. His claim that he did stop JS by slamming his locker was lame. Then he embellished what he told Joe/C/S by saying things like he didn't use words like rape but explaining that they knew what he meant.I agree that McQ has little if any credibility - he was not trusted on the staff by many of the assistants and players. However, I think he had no choice except to agree to be a witness based on the 'stuff' they had on him (gambling, photos). Through all that, he was loyal to JVP and did not want to see him or his reputation harmed. When he read the embellished GJ presentation, I think he realized that Joe could look bad, and wanted to clear the record. So, yes, I believe what he wrote to Eschbach (sp) in his note about her embellishment is him being honest and caring about what happened to Joe and others.
Fwiw, just my opinion, but based on some conversations I've had with those close to it.
What more could he say that he hasn't already said?At some point I would think McQueary will speak about this whole thing. Over ten years removed from it he might be willing to talk.
Didn't Freeh defend the conclusions of his report by saying those were just his opinions?Well, there were attempts made to clarify and correct the record - the Thornburgh, et. al. report made to counter Freeh's baseless conclusions, the Alumni Trustees finding all sorts of evidence to counter Freeh's conclusions as they gained access to that committee's notes, etc., outside journalists who questioned it all (some for the wrong purposes, some out of intellectual curiosity), and on. The alumni found research/notes from the Freeh Group dated as late as April or May of 2012 stating they had no evidence of any coverup or wrong doing by PSU ICA. That's why the report was just a basic book report, and the conclusions Freeh stated publicly had no basis of support from the report itself.
Nothing stuck or made news beyond a couple days. And still we have people - PSU fans - on here who believe Freeh's conclusions, Baldwin's ethics, the BOT's judgment, etc. Unbelievable.
We also cannot forget, as many have pointed out repeatedly, the depth of TSM involvement by a number of PSU's BOT members, and the haste with which TSM's files were shredded as soon as the story broke. That, imo, is where a cover-up happened, and certainly not within PSU ICA.
And on and on... Baldwin's disingenuous, lack of integrity through the whole thing, keeping subpoenas from Spanier and the BOT, giving her legal advice that this was going away, etc., and her official reprimand as a result. So, the info to correct the record is out there. It's just that the people who care about that have no power to overcome the folks with the power to do the right thing but choose not to, for selfish reasons.
I wonder if he got all $14 million.Has mcqueary blown through his millions yet? If so, he will probably start talking in the hopes of getting a book deal or a documentary on Netflix. Bet on it.![]()
What more could he say that he hasn't already said?
Yes, when he had to state it under oath, iirc.Didn't Freeh defend the conclusions of his report by saying those were just his opinions?
There was nothing in the written Freeh Report that substantiated what he alleged in his press briefing. He arranged a computer glitch so that no one could challenge him about this. This was the biggest hoax since "The War of the Worlds" radio incident.Yes, when he had to state it under oath, iirc.
His July 2012 press conference did not make that important distinction. He stated it so that people would presume it to be evidence-based, when of course it wasn't.
He didn't change anything until he was sued over it, I think. His record for post-investigation lawsuits filed against his findings was interesting to say the least.
Was awarded $12.3mm from his case. against PSU. Settled with PSU, presumably for less. Then there is the attorney's cut, usually 30-40%, so McQueary netted considerably less than $14mm. Hope he chokes on it.I wonder if he got all $14 million.
Trying to be objective in this case, setting aside McQ the person, I felt he deserved the award. One of the very few, or maybe the only award paid out around the scandal that was actually merited.Was awarded $12.3mm from his case. against PSU. Settled with PSU, presumably for less. Then there is the attorney's cut, usually 30-40%, so McQueary netted considerably less than $14mm. Hope he chokes on it.
Agree. There was no reason not to pay Magic Mike, who I detest, the separation compensation that his contract allowed for. Couldn't have gone beyond the low six figures, if thatTrying to be objective in this case, setting aside McQ the person, I felt he deserved the award. One of the very few, or maybe the only award paid out around the scandal that was actually merited.
Joyner botched that termination by not following the contract and simply doing the most straightforward thing. Had Joyner just paid him per the contract, as done with the other coaches who were let go under the same circumstances, it would have cost PSU a lot less than the $12mm. And it would have been behind them sooner and with far less noise.
I wonder if Ira had his hand in this one?
How did you see it?
(All that said, yes indeed, choke away).
Weren't the accusations by MM the only one JS was found not guilty of?Sadly juries bought the BS