Balloon

Rogue Cock

Joined Sep 11, 2000
Jan 22, 2022
10,020
14,907
113
Per Biden officials, who have been contradicted by Trump officials.

I don't recall people watching and filming these multiple balloons during that time.
In fairness though, weather balloons fly over the US fairly consistently. Seen quite a few of them over the years....and you wouldn't know whose they were unless someone told you. In this case, I believe the Canadians spilled the beans to the public.....outside of that, people would probably think it was a typical weather balloon.
 

Rogue Cock

Joined Sep 11, 2000
Jan 22, 2022
10,020
14,907
113
Well this has devolved into political name calling. Never imagined that happening on gamecock chat site with moderators who threaten death penalties to violators
The only thing that was informative in this discussion is that both extremes believe the absolute worst of the other. THAT is where our country is today....sadly. And don't anyone start pointing fingers at the other placing blame on the other for starting it....y'all are both at fault.
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,072
113
In fairness though, weather balloons fly over the US fairly consistently. Seen quite a few of them over the years....and you wouldn't know whose they were unless someone told you. In this case, I believe the Canadians spilled the beans to the public.....outside of that, people would probably think it was a typical weather balloon.

That is true, however the ascertation that it happened has been walked back already. I think it was pretty much a CYA move that got exposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dod Rangerfield

Cocky99

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2022
574
503
93
my Biden voter friends are so insecure about the current Govt’s handling of the situation- that all they are obsessively posting about is several Chinese balloons entering US airspace when Trump was POTUS. 😂
I knew Biden would be a mostly inactive Potus. The guy is an 80y/o man who looks more like 100y/o!
 

Blues man

Joined Jul 1, 2009
Jan 22, 2022
1,681
1,666
113
my Biden voter friends are so insecure about the current Govt’s handling of the situation- that all they are obsessively posting about is several Chinese balloons entering US airspace when Trump was POTUS. 😂
I knew Biden would be a mostly inactive Potus. The guy is an 80y/o man who looks more like 100y/o!
That's not necessarly bad I guess. It means they cant defend the actions of the leadership so let's divert. That may be progress
 

GoCocksFight2021

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
1,065
628
113
Are we sure Biden even had it shot down? It was over Myrtle Beach. Could have just caught a stray bullet from a drive by.
 
Last edited:

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,171
12,162
113
I was a bit confused when the dude who is the head of NORAD said they picked up the balloon over the Aleutian Islands but didn't shoot it down b/c they assessed that it didn't pose a threat. So now any country can fly anything they want over here so long as it's not a threat?
 

Lurker123

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2022
3,556
3,072
113
I was a bit confused when the dude who is the head of NORAD said they picked up the balloon over the Aleutian Islands but didn't shoot it down b/c they assessed that it didn't pose a threat. So now any country can fly anything they want over here so long as it's not a threat?

That was kind of weird. How certain are you it's no threat without close investigationn?

It's also annoying how the story changes, and this is true for so many circumstances. But here, the story was that they didn't want to risk hitting people on the ground. Then the story changes to they COULD have, but it was no threat.

There's some old saying that goes something like: If you just tell the truth, you only have to remember one version of the story.
 

Blues man

Joined Jul 1, 2009
Jan 22, 2022
1,681
1,666
113
I was a bit confused when the dude who is the head of NORAD said they picked up the balloon over the Aleutian Islands but didn't shoot it down b/c they assessed that it didn't pose a threat. So now any country can fly anything they want over here so long as it's not a threat?
I'd love to hear how they are able to decide with certainty what an aircraft is carrying as a payload.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

GamecockMike

Joined Mar 29, 2008
Jan 19, 2022
255
189
43
Nothing to do with the balloon,I was told the group in front of us on the course,Bobby Bryant is in it.I like to get pic if I can in the parking lot.
 

TheRoo

Joined Nov 3, 2021
Feb 6, 2022
171
120
43
In terms of this adminstration's behavior, the balloon ranks on the lower end of the spectrum The chances it was doing anything meaningful is slim to none.

My friend was one of the first fighter pilots to fly a mission in Afghanistan and his plane malfunctioned and he had to abort in the middle of the nowhere. After about eight tense hours, he was eventually rescued. When he got be to base and met with the brass, they had closeup images of him urinating on their computer screen via satellite imagery. That was close to 20 years ago. Imagine the technology today.

WIth that said, things do seem to be heating up with China as if it's pre-planned. A few days ago, USAF General Miniham PREDICTED that we would go to war with China in 2025? That is both disturbing and bizarre.

I'd put things like "this will be a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated..." far above the balloon. They knew that wasn't true at all when they stated it. IMO, they are 100% guilt of crimes against humanity - especially children.
 

Go Gamecocks

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2022
798
701
93
USAF-2, PRC balloons-0

 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
Saw an Alaska Senator on TV this morning. He said the AK NG scrambled jets when the balloon was over water and could have taken it down then, but the Biden admin didn't want them to. Guy said the next time they're just going to take it down without asking.

Leon Panetta, an Obama guy, said they could have just brought it down without shooting it down. Who thing is very puzzling, if you don't believe China Joe is bought and paid for by the CCP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kill.Team6

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
For those who wanted it shot down earlier,what if it landed and killed people?
The Alaska Nat Guard scrambled jets to it when it was over the pacific ocean. Could have done it then, but they were told no. They probably could have escorted it to the ground with a couple of Chanooks or something.

Do you think it should have been either shot down in the Pacific, or escorted down in a safe place in Montana or Alaska?
 

Cockgun

Member
Jan 21, 2022
80
66
18
The Alaska Nat Guard scrambled jets to it when it was over the pacific ocean. Could have done it then, but they were told no. They probably could have escorted it to the ground with a couple of Chanooks or something.

Do you think it should have been either shot down in the Pacific, or escorted down in a safe place in Montana or Alaska.
The USAF flies F-16 C and D models in Alaska. These have a service ceiling of 50,000 Ft. The only USAF plane capable of doing the job is the F-22 Raptor, which can fly up to 60,000 Ft.. The Chinese balloon was flying at 60,000+ Ft. This is why Langley based F-22 fighters were vectored to Myrtle Beach instead of a Shaw or McEntire based F-16's or, even a Seymour Johnson based F-15E Strike Eagle. We even had a Mississippi based KC-135 orbiting the zone and both F-22's that were deployed had to hit it at least once, if not twice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Harvard Gamecock

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
The USAF flies F-16 C and D models in Alaska. These have a service ceiling of 50,000 Ft. The only USAF plane capable of doing the job is the F-22 Raptor, which can fly up to 60,000 Ft.. The Chinese balloon was flying at 60,000+ Ft. This is why Langley based F-22 fighters were vectored to Myrtle Beach instead of a Shaw or McEntire based F-16's or, even a Seymour Johnson based F-15E Strike Eagle. We even had a Mississippi based KC-135 orbiting the zone and both F-22's that were deployed had to hit it at least once, if not twice.
Interesting. Pretty surprising given our dust ups that occur with Russia out there. Not saying you’re wrong, but even the norad commander was saying they could have shot it down but chose not to bc he didn’t view it as a threat. Maybe he meant they could have come from Langley to do it. Sounds like they had ample time to address it, but chose not to.

But apparently the AK national air guard thinks they could have done it, and will do it if it happens again.
 

Cockgun

Member
Jan 21, 2022
80
66
18
Interesting. Pretty surprising given our dust ups that occur with Russia out there. Not saying you’re wrong, but even the norad commander was saying they could have shot it down but chose not to bc he didn’t view it as a threat. Maybe he meant they could have come from Langley to do it. Sounds like they had ample time to address it, but chose not to.

But apparently the AK national air guard thinks they could have done it, and will do it if it happens again.
The Alaska National Guard does not fly fighters, only the USAF and the F-16's based out there. I don't know the altitude of the balloon over Alaska but I do know what it was over the continental US. As a civilian, I have flown with the Navy, Marines and the USAF twice, including an F-16 out of Shaw (79th FS, tail 91-468, a Block50) and a KCC-135 out of Seymour Johnson refueling F15E Strike Eagles. It was my business to keep up with this stuff jobwise. By the way, a Canadian based F-18 Hornet, actually fired on one of these balloons several years, thus, from experience, why we used an AIM-9X Sidewinder the other day. That was $400,000.00 worth of missile for that shot.
 

Tngamecock

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
1,706
1,813
113
This actually happened 2 times under trump but he refused to shoot them down. Pentagon confirmed this tonight. So how much did China deposit into trumps Chinese bank account for those fly overs?
Wrong……u watch way too much cnn and believe joe way too much. They back tracked on the Trump thing cause he and no one in command was made aware of it. They now say it was logged but never relayed to anyone up the chain or to Trump. He and his generals said they would have taken it down without hesitation. I worry more about how sick our military must be to not report these things and decide it’s no big deal.

But it happened before now under Biden for sure and he did nothing….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
The Alaska National Guard does not fly fighters, only the USAF and the F-16's based out there. I don't know the altitude of the balloon over Alaska but I do know what it was over the continental US. As a civilian, I have flown with the Navy, Marines and the USAF twice, including an F-16 out of Shaw (79th FS, tail 91-468, a Block50) and a KCC-135 out of Seymour Johnson refueling F15E Strike Eagles. It was my business to keep up with this stuff jobwise. By the way, a Canadian based F-18 Hornet, actually fired on one of these balloons several years, thus, from experience, why we used an AIM-9X Sidewinder the other day. That was $400,000.00 worth of missile for that shot.
Good stuff man!
 

Surfcock

Member
Jul 24, 2022
122
130
43
FYI…..in Alaska the 477th Fighter Group Air Force Reserve Command's a F-22A Raptor unit. So saying the military had to wait till it reached the East Coast due to the balloon’s altitude is not a truthful statement

Even if the F-22 wasn’t stationed in AK, I’m to believe the USAF is unable to scramble the needed fighter from some other base and have tankers meet up for mid-air refueling to complete the mission? We are talking about a balloon not a Bear Bomber
 

Cockgun

Member
Jan 21, 2022
80
66
18
Dude...Vipers, Eagles, Raptors & F-35s can all hit 60k' AGL. F-15 is the fastest jet we have. :oops:
The f-15 might could have done it, and there is a slew of them at Seymour Johnson just north of Myrtle Beach, but at the end of the day, the USAF wanted to get a kill for the F-22, as it is the most expensive jet we have. It was basically a political move.
 
Last edited:

Cockgun

Member
Jan 21, 2022
80
66
18
FYI…..in Alaska the 477th Fighter Group Air Force Reserve Command's a F-22A Raptor unit. So saying the military had to wait till it reached the East Coast due to the balloon’s altitude is not a truthful statement

Even if the F-22 wasn’t stationed in AK, I’m to believe the USAF is unable to scramble the needed fighter from some other base and have tankers meet up for mid-air refueling to complete the mission? We are talking about a balloon not a Bear Bomber
Not disagreeing with you, but you really didn't say anything that was not obvious.
 

Go Gamecocks

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2022
798
701
93
The f-15 might could have done it, and there is a slew of them at Seymour Johnson just north of Myrtle Beach, but at the end of the day, the USAF wanted to get a kill for the F-22, as it is the most expensive jet we have. It was basically a political move.
Once again, you're wrong.
The F-22s were on NORAD alerts duty. Alerts jets get the call. B-2 is the most expensive jet we have.

What you should be asking is why are their contrails at "60,000'"? Google it.
 

Cockgun

Member
Jan 21, 2022
80
66
18
Once again, you're wrong.
The F-22s were on NORAD alerts duty. Alerts jets get the call. B-2 is the most expensive jet we have.

What you should be asking is why are their contrails at "60,000'"? Google it.
I should have said the most expensive fighter jet, and no, I am not wrong. It was all about altitude and getting an F-22 kill. You like to throw terms around, like NORAD. The facts are, the balloon didn't get shot down over Alaska. Days later, when the call came in to take it out, many things were considered. At the end of the day, the Langley based F-22's were vectored to the scene despite our having lethal assets within a hundred miles of the target. Read this: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...ver-the-u-s-is-more-complicated-than-it-seems
 
Last edited: