We've been boring on offense since the 2015 Belk Bowl.Being boring on offense since 2017 doesn’t help things either.
We've been boring on offense since the 2015 Belk Bowl.Being boring on offense since 2017 doesn’t help things either.
YEPConcentrating NIL on anything other than football is the dumbest thing an AD can do in today's college athletics landscape.
You can’t control how thousands of people want to give. But our bigger weakness is that there are tens of thousands that don’t want to give at all.Concentrating NIL on anything other than football is the dumbest thing an AD can do in today's college athletics landscape.
Just when I think you can’t get any dumber you post this…That's why I want to concentrate NIL on basketball and baseball.
Our fanbase, first of all, is small and spread out all over MS and everywhere else. Like I said the other day, we don't really have an urban area to draw from to get 60K on the regular. Secondly, we don't understand how to commit to football. Third, look at our competition. So why swim upstream?
Let’s be honest, dumping everything in football is swimming upstream.Third, look at our competition. So why swim upstream?
Sooo.....you agree with my post? Not sure what your point is, you're literally restating what I said (and that multiple people are calling me dumb about).Let’s be honest, dumping everything in football is swimming upstream.
I’m indifferent. I personally think putting a big chunk into a lesser point would be a good idea. We dont have the money to consistently compete in football. Like I said before, we could spend every dime we have in football and we’d still end up a 6-7 win team in the new SEC era. Honestly, there isn’t a right answer in our case. I’m empathetic at this point.Sooo.....you agree with my post? Not sure what your point is, you're literally restating what I said (and that multiple people are calling me dumb about).
Agree , if all eggs are put in the football basket, it still places you in the bottom 1/3 of the SEC in NIL $$$. That will guarantee you are bad in every sport. this will become self evident to the doubters over the next 2-3 seasons.I’m indifferent. I personally think putting a big chunk into a lesser point would be a good idea. We dont have the money to consistently compete in football. Like I said before, we could spend every dime we have in football and we’d still end up a 6-7 win team in the new SEC era. Honestly, there isn’t a right answer in our case. I’m empathetic at this point.
do You think a head coach “embracing NIL“ is what fills the coffers with money ? is Lebby embracing NIL ? If he is why is our NIL near the bottom of the sec ?Ultimately we’ve just done a poor job of managing the program since Mullen left. Moorhead sucked. Leach wasn’t bad but failed to embrace NIL and a not small portion of our fans were never sold on his playing style. Arnett was in way over his head.
We’ve gotta stop being a revolving door of head coaches and get some stability with a guy who wins and does so in an engaging way. I hope that’s Lebby but obviously it’s TBD.
Is there really any reason to piss on a dead man in this thread? I'm quite sure you can find other examples to further your argument dude.Leach did not have a great offense at MSU. He also didn't win as much as BOTH of his predecessors. Not beating Ole Miss in at least one of his first two years hurt too. He also was not as universally loved as this board thinks he was.
I don’t understand this whole “boring on offense” thing affecting attendance. Do y’all remember how horrible the offenses were under Sherrill? Go back and watch a Sherrill-coached game. Most of the time it’s like going to the dentist watching our offense (the 2000 season a rare exception). And he’s one of the top 5 coaches in the history of the school according to a lot of y’all! I don’t give a crap about the offense. Just win games. Leach had us at 9 wins in his third season, and if he hadn’t died, I think we would be on a nice run of success. But, of course, he died and threw the whole program into disarray. Let’s give Lebby a good chance to fix it and really support the team before we throw him to the wolves.Being boring on offense since 2017 doesn’t help things either.
His offenses were great against mediocre D's but Will's lack of mobility and physicality made us schitty against quality D's. He finished with back to back.500 SEC seasons with an egg bowl W. He is a respected and loved coach across the country. Your assessment is overly one sided.Leach did not have a great offense at MSU. He also didn't win as much as BOTH of his predecessors. Not beating Ole Miss in at least one of his first two years hurt too. He also was not as universally loved as this board thinks he was.
Let me rephrase, Leach and Cohen actively dogged NIL at every opportunity. It was very counterproductive and has us still playing catch up.do You think a head coach “embracing NIL“ is what fills the coffers with money ? is Lebby embracing NIL ? If he is why is our NIL near the bottom of the sec ?
Jackie Sherrill was coaching 1991-2003. There was no sec network. Offenses were all boring. Our stadium was much smaller when he was winning and we still couldn’t fill it (38k the day Hazelwood kicked the game winner against Ark).I don’t understand this whole “boring on offense” thing affecting attendance. Do y’all remember how horrible the offenses were under Sherrill? Go back and watch a Sherrill-coached game. Most of the time it’s like going to the dentist watching out offense (the 2000 season a rare exception). And he’s one of the top 5 coaches in the history of the school according to a lot of y’all! I don’t give a crap about the offense. Just win games. Leach had us at 9 wins in his third season, and if he hadn’t died, I think we would be on a nice run or success. But, of course, he died and threw the whole program into disarray. Let’s give Lebby a good chance to fix it and really support the team before we throw him to the wolves.
Of course it is. He was not as respected and loved as this board thinks.His offenses were great against mediocre D's but Will's lack of mobility and physicality made us schitty against quality D's. He finished with back to back.500 SEC seasons with an egg bowl W. He is a respected and loved coach across the country. Your assessment is overly one sided.
It was brought up that Leach enthusiasm never seemed to catch fire here. I was pointing out why.Is there really any reason to piss on a dead man in this thread? I'm quite sure you can find other examples to further your argument dude.
Yes he was. His schemes had a huge impact on the game.Of course it is. He was not as respected and loved as this board thinks.
We will have to agree to disagree.Yes he was. His schemes had a huge impact on the game.
Yep, watching Leach's offense was like listening to continuous fingernails on a chalkboard to many. There are a LOT more people who feel this way than this board will ever recognize. It was reflected in the attendances and lack of enthusiasm while he was here.Jackie Sherrill was coaching 1991-2003. There was no sec network. Offenses were all boring. Our stadium was much smaller when he was winning and we still couldn’t fill it (38k the day Hazelwood kicked the game winner against Ark).
Leachs offense was miserable to watch. We can win 6-8 games a year running the triple option but no one wants to watch that.
I'll stick to all the opinions of all the great coaches I've heard.We will have to agree to disagree.
What exactly does that have to do with fan support?I'll stick to all the opinions of all the great coaches I've heard.
Agree. Which is another reason we routinely say our fanbase has a “LOT” of moronic nimrod mouth breathers.There are a LOT more people who feel this way than this board will ever recognize. It was reflected in the attendances and lack of enthusiasm while he was here.
They (our fanbase) will never get it. They will never see that Leach’s offense was responsible for opening up holes for their glorious run game. They will never see that the offense was held back due to the limited talent of Will Rogers. They will never see that the future build out would have likely been among the best offensive years this program has ever seen. They will never see what exactly we are up against in football competition. They will never understand that the programs Leach won at had serious disadvantages compared to the blue bloods.I'll stick to all the opinions of all the great coaches I've heard.
If his offense was so great, why didn't every program run it? I know everybody uses air raid concepts, but nobody ran the real thing anymore but Leach. It was as a dated as the wishbone. People knew how to stop it, and did.They (our fanbase) will never get it. They will never see that Leach’s offense was responsible for opening up holes for their glorious run game. They will never see that the offense was held back due to the limited talent of Will Rogers. They will never see that the future build out would have likely been among the best offensive years this program has ever seen. They will never see what exactly we are up against in football competition. They will never understand that the programs Leach won at had serious disadvantages compared to the blue bloods.
They also will likely never see a consistently successful football program. The majority wins, and our fanbase is majority mouth breathing. Maybe not majority, but the loudest. We have more L4s and Coach34s than we realize.
This. All of this.Moorhead hired after Mullen and tears down everything built to that point to ashes. Complete rebuild 2 years from a team that could have been NY6 with competent leadership.
Get a nationally beloved coach and things look up.
Nationally beloved coach dies in the offseason after converting the entire team to Air Raid that no one can now run.
Have to scramble and promote a dud from within.
Next season is a disaster.
End of next season we fire a coach who lasted one season and was awful in recruitment leaving us in the 50’s.
Fans want a home run hire to heal the wounds.
Fans get a coach who is more than likely as good as or better than young Mullen, and has shown flashes of good recruiting, but fans are underwhelmed and stuck in a “wait and see” attitude.
Picked next to last…. Above an absolutely terrible Vandy.
Yea… I think ticket sales may suffer a lil this year.
Ultimately we’ve just done a poor job of managing the program since Mullen left. Moorhead sucked. Leach wasn’t bad but failed to embrace NIL and a not small portion of our fans were never sold on his playing style. Arnett was in way over his head.
We’ve gotta stop being a revolving door of head coaches and get some stability with a guy who wins and does so in an engaging way. I hope that’s Lebby but obviously it’s TBD.
Don't rely so much on your own opinion or those on The Pack. Pay closer attention to players and coaches. There's reasons he's being considered for HOF.If his offense was so great, why didn't every program run it? I know everybody uses air raid concepts, but nobody ran the real thing anymore but Leach. It was as a dated as the wishbone. People knew how to stop it, and did.
1 - Only he could run the way he did;If his offense was so great, why didn't every program run it? I know everybody uses air raid concepts, but nobody ran the real thing anymore but Leach. It was as a dated as the wishbone. People knew how to stop it, and did.
Nobody said he wasnt a brilliant coach. But for whatever reasons State fans didn't show in big numbers during his time here.Don't rely so much on your own opinion or those on The Pack. Pay closer attention to players and coaches. There's reasons he's being considered for HOF.
I liked Leach as a person. But, that air raid concept isn’t something we need here in MS where QBs are a rare commodity. We need the next Dan Mullen, and I’m pretty sure we got him. Just gonna have to enjoy it while it lasts, if it works out.Nobody said he wasnt a brilliant coach. But for whatever reasons State fans didn't show in big numbers during his time here.
Whatever that reason is, can be wildly debated. However I remember even Robbie Faulk mentioned the novelty(maybe he used a different word) of Leach had worn. It could be seen in the empty seats. Or opposing fans.