Dan Mullen says in this interview that he still loves Starkville and so does his wife Megan.
If you can promise a run of attractive women - I bet you could.And I loved living in the fraternity house.
….but they probably won’t let me do it again.
Dan Mullen says in this interview that he still loves Starkville and so does his wife Megan.
Dan Mullen says in this interview that he still loves Starkville and so does his wife Megan.
You might want to confirm but I believe Colonel Kang agrees with youIf Mullen wants to come back we would be FOOLS to not hire him
I agree if 3-4 other coaches turn us down first…If Mullen wants to come back we would be FOOLS to not hire him
Dan Mullen says in this interview that he still loves Starkville and so does his wife Megan.
You would if he came in and started winning againI will not support Dan Mullen.
Hevesy is a great OL coach on the field. He got the most out of the talent we had on the line, and developed several into NFL players.If he comes back I hope he doesn't bring Hevesy with him.
No. It wouldn't be that bad. I doubt there's much interest in him coming back on either side. He's retired and enjoying it. We do need to maintain good relations with him just like we have with Jackie Sherrill, and we would have with Leach if he had been able to retire from here. I do think we need to call him (probably already have) and get his thought on this coaching search. I think he could really help us with this.Polk II
I don't hate the way he left. He is the only MSU coach in my nearly 60 years to leave voluntarily. Like it or not that means he was successful here for pretty much his whole tenure. I'd take that from every single coach we ever hire in any sport.Dan Mullen is nearly as good as he wants to be. He is a dang good coach. Not great, but really good. I think NIL may actually help elevate him because he has more of a CEO mindset. I also don’t believe he ever had great position coaches. MSU has more money now and could surround him with more coaching and recruiting talent. I hate the way he left, but I’d take him back.
I don't understand this because he was the one that recruited DakHevesy is a great OL coach on the field. He got the most out of the talent we had on the line, and developed several into NFL players.
HOWEVER, he should never - and I mean NEVER - be allowed near a recruit or his high school coach.
I used this analogy when he was here, but if you have a position coach like Hevesy on staff, you have to do like the army does: you don't meet the drill sergeant in the recruiting station. They wait and introduce him the first morning of boot camp... after you've signed the papers.
I think that's why so many hate him. He voluntarily left. State fans can't fathom anyone voluntarily leaving you either stay or we fire you.I don't hate the way he left. He is the only MSU coach in my nearly 60 years to leave voluntarily. Like it or not that means he was successful here for pretty much his whole tenure. I'd take that from every single coach we ever hire in any sport.
For the record I don't think there is much real interest in him coming back, from either side. If he IS interested, we would be fools if we don't take him.
Diaz IIPolk II
No sir, I would not.You would if he came in and started winning again
33-39 in his stop here in the SEC that was nowhere as good across the board.Dan Mullen is nearly as good as he wants to be. He is a dang good coach. Not great, but really good. I think NIL may actually help elevate him because he has more of a CEO mindset. I also don’t believe he ever had great position coaches. MSU has more money now and could surround him with more coaching and recruiting talent. I hate the way he left, but I’d take him back.
Hevesy is a great OL coach on the field. He got the most out of the talent we had on the line, and developed several into NFL players.
HOWEVER, he should never - and I mean NEVER - be allowed near a recruit or his high school coach.
I used this analogy when he was here, but if you have a position coach like Hevesy on staff, you have to do like the army does: you don't meet the drill sergeant in the recruiting station. They wait and introduce him the first morning of boot camp... after you've signed the papers.
The guy is a good OL coach, however he is toxic, and a world class ******* ( I knew him personally, halfway liked him and still thought he was an *******). Know there are some that would run through walls for him, but there are just as many that would like to hit him with their car. Not sure he fits college any longer, and not sure he will ever coach again.Hevesy is a great OL coach on the field. He got the most out of the talent we had on the line, and developed several into NFL players.
HOWEVER, he should never - and I mean NEVER - be allowed near a recruit or his high school coach.
I used this analogy when he was here, but if you have a position coach like Hevesy on staff, you have to do like the army does: you don't meet the drill sergeant in the recruiting station. They wait and introduce him the first morning of boot camp... after you've signed the papers.
What have we been since......or before?33-39 in his stop here in the SEC that was nowhere as good across the board.
No thank you
He was at a game and saw him play, then told Dan "Hey, this kid is going to be good. He's got a rare leadership quality. We need to get him", so yeah he gets credit for finding him.I don't understand this because he was the one that recruited Dak
That may be the biggest vote of confidence anyone could give him.I will not support Dan Mullen.
Yes we do know what to expect. Less than 500 in the SEC (33-39) and in his tenure here 3-22 against ranked teams. The Air Raid produced more.Dan Mullen did a great job of developing QBs. I would love to see him back. I hope he has figured out how to keep a DC.
We know what to expect from him. He also knows what to expect from us. I think he would be successful again. Unlike most I believe he did a good job recruiting with our limitations. It would really upset the OM fans to see him back. He knows the area for recruiting and he does a good job developing talent. He would have a great goal too. It should only take him one season to win the most games at State. We know he can run an organization.
What have we been since......or before?
That is not going to make your case for Mullen. I think MSU is capable of better than 33-39 and 3-22 against ranked teams.What have we been since......or before?
Increase your NIL investment so we can rise above .500! He accomplished an amazing feat with the talent we had in 2014. Some of you have unrealistic expectations. I would love a NC in football. Which coach got us closest to that over the last 25 years?Yes we do know what to expect. Less than 500 in the SEC (33-39) and in his tenure here 3-22 against ranked teams. The Air Raid produced more.
3-22 in 9 seasons vs 6 wins in 3 seasons.
Not with Mullen. Period. Like I said, 3-22 vs ranked teams. If we can't do better than that, just leave the SEC. I don't live in the past. I don't want to walk that path again. There are better coaches out there that I would rather give an opportunity to.Increase your NIL investment so we can rise above .500! He accomplished an amazing feat with the talent we had in 2014. Some of you have unrealistic expectations. I would love a NC in football. Which coach got us closest to that over the last 25 years?
We know a lot more about Mullen now than the first time out of Florida. Every time he hits 8-4 we'll have to worry about who he's on a plane to see next. He did get us to a level above Sylvester Croom, but he folded like a cheap suit in big games. Yeah, 2014 was the closest we ever got, but we could have done even better if he hadn't sent Dak up the middle 60% of the time against Alabama and Ole Miss. Just because he gave us hope when he did, doesn't mean he can pull off the repeat. Not likely at all in my opinion.
And as a follow up, He and his staff talked openly in front of the players at practice about the job they were taking at UT. That was in 2017. Just NO!We know a lot more about Mullen now than the first time out of Florida. Every time he hits 8-4 we'll have to worry about who he's on a plane to see next. He did get us to a level above Sylvester Croom, but he folded like a cheap suit in big games. Yeah, 2014 was the closest we ever got, but we could have done even better if he hadn't sent Dak up the middle 60% of the time against Alabama and Ole Miss. Just because he gave us hope when he did, doesn't mean he can pull off the repeat. Not likely at all in my opinion.
The only foolish thing we could do would be to hire him with no strings attached, to ignore his blatant faults and not address them in his contract. And once you address those.....it doesn't make sense for him to come back, from his perspective.If Mullen wants to come back we would be FOOLS to not hire him
You are using it to make yours, while ignoring our record without him. LOL.That is not going to make your case for Mullen. I think MSU is capable of better than 33-39 and 3-22 against ranked teams
Leaving the SEC would be absolutely INSANE. You are nuts.Not with Mullen. Period. Like I said, 3-22 vs ranked teams. If we can't do better than that, just leave the SEC. I don't live in the past. I don't want to walk that path again. There are better coaches out there that I would rather give an opportunity to.
At least we HAD big games while he was here.We know a lot more about Mullen now than the first time out of Florida. Every time he hits 8-4 we'll have to worry about who he's on a plane to see next. He did get us to a level above Sylvester Croom, but he folded like a cheap suit in big games. Yeah, 2014 was the closest we ever got, but we could have done even better if he hadn't sent Dak up the middle 60% of the time against Alabama and Ole Miss. Just because he gave us hope when he did, doesn't mean he can pull off the repeat. Not likely at all in my opinion.