Game thread for game vs Florida
- Thread starter 1vagamecock
- Start date
Ridiculous. I have always said that the coaches need time to turn this around. It has never happened quickly here, even with Spurrier, and anybody that expected it to happen that way with this staff, or any staff, was living in a fantasy. Many hated them from the start and were calling for firings only a few games into last season. That is beyond ridiculous.
If Beamer isn't happy and wants to fire Satt, I'm 100% behind him. And if he chooses not to, I'm 100% with him on that too. Offense isn't easy here at SC and in the SEC. I wouldn't blame him a bit if he gave him more time to get it right. Crying on the internet 24/7 certainly isn't going to help or change anything.
We are bowling eligible 2 years in a row after a disastrous Muschamp ending. And you can't pull out play and create losses. That is not fair to the players or the Beamer. Football is a team sport, and everything matters.
Just curious. Where exactly did you think we would be now after what happened with Muschamp?
I didn't go from anything to anything. I have ALWAYS said that. Nothing has changed. And I still don't think he fires Satterfield. Unlike "fans" who think great teams just happen because they want it and want it right now, Beamer understands that it takes a lot of time/work/money/talent to win big, especially somewhere like South Carolina.
Win big? Win big? I just want to look something close to competent. Is it too much to ask that we look like we practiced a few times during the week? That's all I'm asking right now. Show me that you at least knew who our opponent was, that you watched some game tape and practiced a couple hours or so.
Really? A few weeks ago you said it's "not happening" when discussing Satterfield being let go. You even told people to go cry about it.
Now you're saying you're on board with Shane firing him.
I would certainly call that a change.
I said it wasn't happening because I didn't think he would fire him. And I still don't.
I've always said it is up to coach and that I support his decision 100%. Nothing has changed.
I'm sure that made sense in your head. But saying it isn't happening then saying your on board if it does is a large change.
Just checking in. Has Sattefield been fired yet? Also, as long as I'm trying to catch up, has Beamer figured out that the sunglasses don't help the offense score or the defense stop anything? I'll hang up and take your answer off air. Thanks.
A few weeks back you were touting a great Missouri defense for the reason our offense struggled at Mizzu. Has their defense fallen off since we played them or is Tennessee that good? 700 yards?
If we fire Satt at the end of this season, would any other P5 program look at him in any capacity. Would any G5 even look at him?
I've always said I was on board with him firing Satt if that is what he feels is correct. Goes for any coach. Still don't believe it happens.
But if it does and he hires someone else and the same irrational idiots start calling for his firing a few games in, I'll say the same exact thing I've been saying. Coaches deserve time to get it right. Beamer will decide that, and I'll be 100% behind him.
Ray is probably working on a contract extension to make sure another team doesn't come in and steal him away.
Need to move fast to lock him up. Fully guaranteed, of course.
Even your denials have changed. "Not happening, go ahead and start crying now" has turned into "I still don't think", or "still don't believe".
But saying you trust Shane in whatever he decides is a nice way of setting yourself up to pretend to be "right" either way. And not transparent at all.
Mizzou does have a very good defense. Didn't play well today. Hooker is very good. Tennessee oline played very well.
So, since I didn't watch the game can you guys tell me. If they hadn't fumbled would it have changed the final score of the game our would we have punted anyway?
I had checked out by that point, so I didn't see them. I'm sure we're gonna hear all about the fumbles, but the offense was already totally MIA before the fumbles. It's not like the offense had something working before the fumbles. The fumbles were just the dingleberries on top of the turd sundae that was our offense in this game.
That's okay. I know you're on board either way now. Hedging your bets shows so much confidence.
Nah the performance of this offense and it’s coordinator is making people either cry in despair or due to unmitigated laughter. Either way enough tears are being generated.
It was my position last year too. Nothing has changed.
https://southcarolina.forums.rivals...r-qb-tanner-bailey.374789/page-3#post-6039093
I hate that our team sucks so bad, but that was hilarious
I've accepted that Beamer is never going to say anything meaningful.
Nothing has changed except your adamant denial that Satterfield will be fired is suddenly not so adamant.
I could care leass about the obviously transparent comment about trusting the coaches either way. That's a lame cya comment, and doesn't fool anyone.
The question was dodged, but if you know her script, the answer would be that Huepel is an idiot and anything good UT did was all because Hooker and no one else.
Missouri must still have an awesome defense, so Hooker is just THAT good.
It wasn't meant to fool anybody. It's my position now and has always been my position. Nothing has changed. My post from last year proves it.
And my position on the firing hasn't changed. He won't be fired. Not sure how many ways you need me to say it.
Mizzou is ranked 14th in the nation in total defense, the stat that is quoted as defensive gospel around here, so y'all can't have it both ways.
And you will see about Hooker. Just wait.
So when Hooker leaves, UT would rather be in our position than theirs right?
Man if you only knew how many people reading your nonsense posts say “idiot” to themselves.
Your post from last year only proves you cya even when youre supposedly so sure.
I do like to see you coming around and not being so adamant about him staying though. It's a good sign that even you see it coming.
The question I asked him was rhetorical. I already knew his answer before I asked.
So when Hooker leaves, UT would rather be in our position than theirs right?
Man if you only knew how many people reading your nonsense posts say “idiot” to themselves.
I never said that. You are just making crap up.
But their success is Hooker, not Heupel. You will see.
So when Hooker leaves, UT would rather be in our position than theirs right?
Man if you only knew how many people reading your nonsense posts say “idiot” to themselves.
Bear in mind, he thinks Kiffin is falling on his face this year (after losing the qb Carrol) by being 8-2 and ranked top 15 (ish).
Nothing is "dodged". Mizzou D is very good. Fact. Hooker is very good and abused them today.