I was probably wrong when I spent years advocating for abolishing divisions

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,786
788
113
The lack of round robin gives uneven schedules and a complete crapshoot as to who gets into the conference championship games. Plus, a whole bunch of rivalries and annual games that have existed for years are gone. I thought it was cool that we missed out on Alabama, LSU, and Auburn before the season, but now I wish we'd just played them like we have every year of my life.

I really hope they adopt one of these ~70 team super league proposals with smaller divisions, round robins, and objective W/L records determining who gets in.
 

travis.sixpack

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2008
1,073
1,081
113
The lack of round robin gives uneven schedules and a complete crapshoot as to who gets into the conference championship games. Plus, a whole bunch of rivalries and annual games that have existed for years are gone. I thought it was cool that we missed out on Alabama, LSU, and Auburn before the season, but now I wish we'd just played them like we have every year of my life.

I really hope they adopt one of these ~70 team super league proposals with smaller divisions, round robins, and objective W/L records determining who gets in.
It’s going to be hilarious when the Super League forms and recreates a 10 team SEC, along with all the other regional conferences that came about organically a hundred years ago.

BTW, I’m still fuming about the SEC running back the ‘24 schedule next season. Who knows what teams will look like next year but it’s ******** that we’ve got to play Tex, A&M and Ga again, instead of Auburn, LSU, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

RockyDog

Well-known member
Jan 2, 2023
1,010
1,236
113
It’s going to be hilarious when the Super League forms and recreates a 10 team SEC, along with all the other regional conferences that came about organically a hundred years ago.

BTW, I’m still fuming about the SEC running back the ‘24 schedule next season. Who knows what teams will look like next year but it’s ******** that we’ve got to play Tex, A&M and Ga again, instead of Auburn, LSU, etc.
Yea. The lazy flip flop is ridiculous. Us and Florida get punished for a 2nd year in a row while Ole Miss gets another cake walk. Their hardest road games next season will be Georgia, Oklahoma and Kentucky. Brutal. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

travis.sixpack

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2008
1,073
1,081
113
Yea. The lazy flip flop is ridiculous. Us and Florida get punished for a 2nd year in a row while Ole Miss gets another cake walk. Their hardest road games next season will be Georgia, Oklahoma and Kentucky. Brutal. :(
If we had a good team coming back, especially on defense, that ‘25 home schedule would be lit - UGa, Tex, Tenn, and OM. Instead, Lebby brings back Hutzler and the rest of the clowns and we’ll see lots of opposing fans filling up DWS looking for an easy win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,378
4,998
113
The lack of round robin gives uneven schedules and a complete crapshoot as to who gets into the conference championship games. Plus, a whole bunch of rivalries and annual games that have existed for years are gone. I thought it was cool that we missed out on Alabama, LSU, and Auburn before the season, but now I wish we'd just played them like we have every year of my life.

I really hope they adopt one of these ~70 team super league proposals with smaller divisions, round robins, and objective W/L records determining who gets in.
The SEC and Big 10 aren't going anywhere, including merging into a super conference. That'd be stupid on their part. They run CFB, they're not going to secede any ground, if anything they will add a couple more teams to become even more powerful. To me, UNC is the prize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

FlotownDawg

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
5,543
4,514
113
We got absolutely raped with the schedule. We could potentially play four playoff teams this year, and play all of them on the road. Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Ole Miss. Meanwhile, Texas has played one team with a SEC record over .500 and lost to that team. The lack of scheduling parody makes the SEC Championship game basically a sham.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog and Dawg84

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,378
4,998
113
We got absolutely raped with the schedule. We could potentially play four playoff teams this year, and play all of them on the road. Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Ole Miss. Meanwhile, Texas has played one team with a SEC record over .500 and lost to that team. The lack of scheduling parody makes the SEC Championship game basically a sham.
Is Simpleton still in charge of scheduling? Sounds like it. After all he did vote to ban cowbells.
 

Bulldog from Birth

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2007
2,307
509
113
I’m a rare breed. I think they’ve been taking college football in the wrong direction for a very long time. I never understood why we ever needed a true undisputed national champion. What was so wrong about the regional model of the 80s and early 90’s? Your goal for the season was to win your conference title. And it wasn’t the end of the world if you got to the end of the season and just had to debate whether undefeated Nebraska or undefeated Washington was better. And I miss the old New Year’s Day bowl bonanza, where rather than every game in its own time slot, it felt more like a Day 1 of March Madness where you always had a great game in every slot because 4 were going on simultaneously.
 

DesotoCountyDawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
22,562
10,334
113
I would be fine with no divisions if they would mix up the matchups for next season and not just flip this seasons schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog
Aug 15, 2011
634
158
43
They need to go back to 2 divisions but do a lottery every year to allocate the teams based on their previous years records. It wouldn’t be perfect but would add some balance to the schedules.
 

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
964
560
93
I’m a rare breed. I think they’ve been taking college football in the wrong direction for a very long time. I never understood why we ever needed a true undisputed national champion. What was so wrong about the regional model of the 80s and early 90’s? Your goal for the season was to win your conference title. And it wasn’t the end of the world if you got to the end of the season and just had to debate whether undefeated Nebraska or undefeated Washington was better. And I miss the old New Year’s Day bowl bonanza, where rather than every game in its own time slot, it felt more like a Day 1 of March Madness where you always had a great game in every slot because 4 were going on simultaneously.
This 100%
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login