I was probably wrong when I spent years advocating for abolishing divisions

QuaoarsKing

Well-known member
Mar 11, 2008
4,786
788
113
The lack of round robin gives uneven schedules and a complete crapshoot as to who gets into the conference championship games. Plus, a whole bunch of rivalries and annual games that have existed for years are gone. I thought it was cool that we missed out on Alabama, LSU, and Auburn before the season, but now I wish we'd just played them like we have every year of my life.

I really hope they adopt one of these ~70 team super league proposals with smaller divisions, round robins, and objective W/L records determining who gets in.
 

travis.sixpack

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2008
1,077
1,082
113
The lack of round robin gives uneven schedules and a complete crapshoot as to who gets into the conference championship games. Plus, a whole bunch of rivalries and annual games that have existed for years are gone. I thought it was cool that we missed out on Alabama, LSU, and Auburn before the season, but now I wish we'd just played them like we have every year of my life.

I really hope they adopt one of these ~70 team super league proposals with smaller divisions, round robins, and objective W/L records determining who gets in.
It’s going to be hilarious when the Super League forms and recreates a 10 team SEC, along with all the other regional conferences that came about organically a hundred years ago.

BTW, I’m still fuming about the SEC running back the ‘24 schedule next season. Who knows what teams will look like next year but it’s ******** that we’ve got to play Tex, A&M and Ga again, instead of Auburn, LSU, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

RockyDog

Well-known member
Jan 2, 2023
1,010
1,236
113
It’s going to be hilarious when the Super League forms and recreates a 10 team SEC, along with all the other regional conferences that came about organically a hundred years ago.

BTW, I’m still fuming about the SEC running back the ‘24 schedule next season. Who knows what teams will look like next year but it’s ******** that we’ve got to play Tex, A&M and Ga again, instead of Auburn, LSU, etc.
Yea. The lazy flip flop is ridiculous. Us and Florida get punished for a 2nd year in a row while Ole Miss gets another cake walk. Their hardest road games next season will be Georgia, Oklahoma and Kentucky. Brutal. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

travis.sixpack

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2008
1,077
1,082
113
Yea. The lazy flip flop is ridiculous. Us and Florida get punished for a 2nd year in a row while Ole Miss gets another cake walk. Their hardest road games next season will be Georgia, Oklahoma and Kentucky. Brutal. :(
If we had a good team coming back, especially on defense, that ‘25 home schedule would be lit - UGa, Tex, Tenn, and OM. Instead, Lebby brings back Hutzler and the rest of the clowns and we’ll see lots of opposing fans filling up DWS looking for an easy win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawg84

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,378
5,003
113
The lack of round robin gives uneven schedules and a complete crapshoot as to who gets into the conference championship games. Plus, a whole bunch of rivalries and annual games that have existed for years are gone. I thought it was cool that we missed out on Alabama, LSU, and Auburn before the season, but now I wish we'd just played them like we have every year of my life.

I really hope they adopt one of these ~70 team super league proposals with smaller divisions, round robins, and objective W/L records determining who gets in.
The SEC and Big 10 aren't going anywhere, including merging into a super conference. That'd be stupid on their part. They run CFB, they're not going to secede any ground, if anything they will add a couple more teams to become even more powerful. To me, UNC is the prize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

FlotownDawg

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2012
5,543
4,517
113
We got absolutely raped with the schedule. We could potentially play four playoff teams this year, and play all of them on the road. Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Ole Miss. Meanwhile, Texas has played one team with a SEC record over .500 and lost to that team. The lack of scheduling parody makes the SEC Championship game basically a sham.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog and Dawg84

greenbean.sixpack

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2012
6,378
5,003
113
We got absolutely raped with the schedule. We could potentially play four playoff teams this year, and play all of them on the road. Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Ole Miss. Meanwhile, Texas has played one team with a SEC record over .500 and lost to that team. The lack of scheduling parody makes the SEC Championship game basically a sham.
Is Simpleton still in charge of scheduling? Sounds like it. After all he did vote to ban cowbells.
 

Bulldog from Birth

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2007
2,307
509
113
I’m a rare breed. I think they’ve been taking college football in the wrong direction for a very long time. I never understood why we ever needed a true undisputed national champion. What was so wrong about the regional model of the 80s and early 90’s? Your goal for the season was to win your conference title. And it wasn’t the end of the world if you got to the end of the season and just had to debate whether undefeated Nebraska or undefeated Washington was better. And I miss the old New Year’s Day bowl bonanza, where rather than every game in its own time slot, it felt more like a Day 1 of March Madness where you always had a great game in every slot because 4 were going on simultaneously.
 
Aug 15, 2011
634
158
43
They need to go back to 2 divisions but do a lottery every year to allocate the teams based on their previous years records. It wouldn’t be perfect but would add some balance to the schedules.
 

Villagedawg

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2005
965
560
93
I’m a rare breed. I think they’ve been taking college football in the wrong direction for a very long time. I never understood why we ever needed a true undisputed national champion. What was so wrong about the regional model of the 80s and early 90’s? Your goal for the season was to win your conference title. And it wasn’t the end of the world if you got to the end of the season and just had to debate whether undefeated Nebraska or undefeated Washington was better. And I miss the old New Year’s Day bowl bonanza, where rather than every game in its own time slot, it felt more like a Day 1 of March Madness where you always had a great game in every slot because 4 were going on simultaneously.
This 100%
 

travis.sixpack

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2008
1,077
1,082
113
We got absolutely raped with the schedule. We could potentially play four playoff teams this year, and play all of them on the road. Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Ole Miss. Meanwhile, Texas has played one team with a SEC record over .500 and lost to that team. The lack of scheduling parody makes the SEC Championship game basically a sham.
The SEC weighted the schedule based on records from the previous 5 years of each team and ranked them. Supposedly teams at the bottom would play more teams at the bottom and vice versa. However, they set the schedule two years ago, so teams that sucked the previous 5-7 years (see Ole Miss, Tennessee, Missouri) were considered bottom teams. Those teams got better, along with Texas and A&M and you now have a perfect storm of BRUTAL schedule.

I suspect in '26 if they go to 9 games, they will completely reshuffle the schedule and probably make State go to UGa again.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,260
7,838
113
I’m a rare breed. I think they’ve been taking college football in the wrong direction for a very long time. I never understood why we ever needed a true undisputed national champion. What was so wrong about the regional model of the 80s and early 90’s? Your goal for the season was to win your conference title. And it wasn’t the end of the world if you got to the end of the season and just had to debate whether undefeated Nebraska or undefeated Washington was better. And I miss the old New Year’s Day bowl bonanza, where rather than every game in its own time slot, it felt more like a Day 1 of March Madness where you always had a great game in every slot because 4 were going on simultaneously.
I know the feeling, but the entire time D1 FBS was always the odd man out. Even the NFL used playoffs. But I will say, one thing the bowl system did, was it gave EVERYONE a reward for a good season, even if it wasn't a national title. But there was a ton of unfairness in that system too, as the bowls were based on conference merit, not overall merit.

While I enjoyed the old days, the playoff is progress.
 

OG Goat Holder

Well-known member
Sep 30, 2022
8,260
7,838
113
I suspect in '26 if they go to 9 games, they will completely reshuffle the schedule and probably make State go to UGa again.
This is what needs to happen, although there's no reason for the SEC to do this until there is proof that the committee will use strength of schedule, and not just sheer record. Or give them a guaranteed minimum amount of teams.

Plus TV money from ESPN.
 
Get unlimited access today.

Pick the right plan for you.

Already a member? Login