Is Alex Murdaugh guilty ?

92Pony

Joined Jan 18, 2011
Jan 20, 2022
2,466
6,509
113
There's an awful lot that doesn't add up.
Agree. I don't think it's anywhere near as cut and dry as the prosecution's neat little sequence of events.

I have lots of questions. To me, RAM seems like a bit of a goof - not a hardened, stone-cold murderer. He also seems like an outdoorsman who's probably pretty handy with a gun (there were enough of them around). Why did it take a glancing blow to the chest, and then one through the shoulder and into the side of the head to kill PM? And why did he shoot MM in the gut and thigh first? That's some bad shooting right there...
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWW and Yemacock

USCBatgirl21

Joined Sep 5, 2006
Jan 31, 2022
6,076
15,287
113
Did they ever explain why they did the murder trial prior to the financial crimes trial Would have avoided the potential for a overturning the verdict due to the judges decision to allow the allegations of financial crimes to be used in the murder trial.
The Defense moved for a speedy trial, and it was granted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anon1663014196
Jan 18, 2022
159
118
43
The whole out of gas scenario doesn't add up. First off, who runs out of gas then gets out of the car to open the gas cap and just leave it open? Secondly, his wallet was left in his car. So he ran out of gas, opened the cap, then started walking to a gas station without his wallet?

He was also found in the opposite direction of the closest gas station. If he did run out of gas, i think it's plausible that he called someone to come help him. Potentially Buster. And when he came to help, he took that opportunity. There no reason the cap is off unless someone was getting ready to put gas in it. And if someone was getting ready to put gas in it, doesn't make sense for him to be walking to a gas station, without his wallet. It's just not a logical scenario.
Your opinion is buttressed by his family’s account of a previous occurrence where he immediately called his sister and timidly hid in nearby woods until she arrived.
 

Gamecock Lincoln

Joined Nov 10, 2007 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 18, 2022
733
1,804
93
Agree. I don't think it's anywhere near as cut and dry as the prosecution's neat little sequence of events.

I have lots of questions. To me, RAM seems like a bit of a goof - not a hardened, stone-cold murderer. He also seems like an outdoorsman who's probably pretty handy with a gun (there were enough of them around). Why did it take a glancing blow to the chest, and then one through the shoulder and into the side of the head to kill PM? And why did he shoot MM in the gut and thigh first? That's some bad shooting right there...
Dr. Kenny McKinsey was a brilliant expert witness. He disputed the defense's expert about the "2" 5'2 shooter theory. They were basing their theory on the victims and suspect(s) being stationary and shouldering the weapon. Dr. Kinsey said this was a very chaotic dynamic crime scene. Evidence suggested both victims and shooter were most likely moving. Regardless of the skill level of a killer, this is not like sitting in a deer stand shooting at an grazing animal. Even trained police officers are very inaccurate in heat of the moment shootings. Plus this was his family.

The below animation is probably pretty close to what happened. I think Alex most likely had the weapons on the golf cart. Only Alex knows what really happened and he will continue to lie like he's always done.

 

Irvin Snibbley

Active member
Mar 24, 2022
401
285
63
alex finally admitted that he drove down to the kennel in a golf cart at the time he was seen on the video...Also it was reported that somehow Maggie had a tire tread mark on the back of her leg....Someone firing a shot from a golf cart would likely fire it from lower to the ground than a standing person...
Exactly what transpired on that night is still unclear.I pray that someday we'll find out.
 

92Pony

Joined Jan 18, 2011
Jan 20, 2022
2,466
6,509
113
Dr. Kenny McKinsey was a brilliant expert witness. He disputed the defense's expert about the "2" 5'2 shooter theory. They were basing their theory on the victims and suspect(s) being stationary and shouldering the weapon. Dr. Kinsey said this was a very chaotic dynamic crime scene. Evidence suggested both victims and shooter were most likely moving. Regardless of the skill level of a killer, this is not like sitting in a deer stand shooting at an grazing animal. Even trained police officers are very inaccurate in heat of the moment shootings. Plus this was his family.

The below animation is probably pretty close to what happened. I think Alex most likely had the weapons on the golf cart. Only Alex knows what really happened and he will continue to lie like he's always done.


I actually saw that same video the other day. Kind of chilling to watch it - even though it's just an animation.
Like a lot of people, I too get sucked into the TV show / movie shooting scenes where everyone makes perfect head-shots all of the time. We can only try to imagine the chaos of that evening..... I'm not convinced AM pulled those triggers - maybe he did - but even one of his brothers is saying (NY Times interview) that he doesn't think Alex isn't telling everything he knows. I hope we somehow learn the 100% concrete truth one day.
 

Gamecock Lincoln

Joined Nov 10, 2007 • Garnet Trust Supporter
Jan 18, 2022
733
1,804
93
I actually saw that same video the other day. Kind of chilling to watch it - even though it's just an animation.
Like a lot of people, I too get sucked into the TV show / movie shooting scenes where everyone makes perfect head-shots all of the time. We can only try to imagine the chaos of that evening..... I'm not convinced AM pulled those triggers - maybe he did - but even one of his brothers is saying (NY Times interview) that he doesn't think Alex isn't telling everything he knows. I hope we somehow learn the 100% concrete truth one day.
We'll never know why but I'm 100% convinced that he did murder them both
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CWW and Gamecock122

Mauze1

Joined Jul 11, 2012
Jan 20, 2022
740
722
93
There's no way his law firm wasn't in on the financial crimes unless they're just so grossly incompetent they didn't notice millions of dollars missing.
I thought that also. It was going on a while not to be noticed, at the bank and the firm.
 

18IsTheMan

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2022
14,154
12,146
113
His lawyers have requested a re-trial on the basis that the court clerk worked behind the scenes to sway jurors to secure a quick guilty verdict so that she could then write a book about the trial (which she since has and was released 8/1).
 

Deleted11512

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2023
4,985
3,954
113
His lawyers have requested a re-trial on the basis that the court clerk worked behind the scenes to sway jurors to secure a quick guilty verdict so that she could then write a book about the trial (which she since has and was released 8/1).
I would LOVE to watch that played out again. It was must watch TV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWW

Stardust710

Member
Jul 21, 2023
299
140
43
Yes, but I am not sure why he killed his wife and son. We will never know. I think there will be at least one juror who holds out for not guilty. So…I think it will be a hung jury. But some are saying the jury is hanging on to every word of some of the state’s witnesses.
They were a Liability.
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
His lawyers have requested a re-trial on the basis that the court clerk worked behind the scenes to sway jurors to secure a quick guilty verdict so that she could then write a book about the trial (which she since has and was released 8/1).
Evidence or hearsay?
 

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,050
557
113
Evidence or hearsay?
Affidavits by the jury members. This seems pretty strong to me but I’m not a lawyer. If what they are alleging is true then he deserves a retrial. She knew the juror that got kicked off late was a not guilty vote. Supposedly made up the Facebook post that she could not produce at the time of snitching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWW and Cola GCock

USCBatgirl21

Joined Sep 5, 2006
Jan 31, 2022
6,076
15,287
113
What would happen to her if the defense claims are true?
She would lose her job at the very least. I'm not well versed on what, if any, criminal charges could be brought against her. But I would think those could follow. I imagine the AG's office is none too pleased right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWW

HillsToSea

Joined Apr 12, 2020
Jan 25, 2022
792
719
93
She would lose her job at the very least. I'm not well versed on what, if any, criminal charges could be brought against her. But I would think those could follow. I imagine the AG's office is none too pleased right now.
I don’t know her but have been around her a few times. Think she was seeing dollar signs. Hope it didn’t cloud her judgement enough to do what the defense is claiming
 

USCBatgirl21

Joined Sep 5, 2006
Jan 31, 2022
6,076
15,287
113
I don’t know her but have been around her a few times. Think she was seeing dollar signs. Hope it didn’t cloud her judgement enough to do what the defense is claiming
Not certain it was just the dollar signs. I think there was personal animus toward Alex as well.
 

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
All Murdaugh and his defense want is another chance to roll the dice with a new jury (nothing to lose) - not sure it changes the outcome because the evidence shows he was there.
 

Yard_Pimps

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2022
1,050
557
113
All Murdaugh and his defense want is another chance to roll the dice with a new jury (nothing to lose) - not sure it changes the outcome because the evidence shows he was there.
Changes a lot. It doesn’t matter what you think the evidence says, only what the jury thinks. Two jurors have signed affidavits that they were pressured to change their vote from not guilty. One presumable firm not guilty was removed because of a Facebook post this very clerk of court said she saw but could not produce it. Judge Newman took her word for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cola GCock

Prestonyte

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
5,261
5,214
113
Changes a lot. It doesn’t matter what you think the evidence says, only what the jury thinks. Two jurors have signed affidavits that they were pressured to change their vote from not guilty. One presumable firm not guilty was removed because of a Facebook post this very clerk of court said she saw but could not produce it. Judge Newman took her word for it.
New jury likely to produce the same guilty verdict based on the evidence. Rolling the dice, but like I said, nothing to lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cola GCock