Lloyd
- Thread starter Atlanta Cock
- Start date
He’s right most of the time. How many times have we watched them play be open but a block is missed, ball dropped, bad throw, etc. The first thing posters do is complain about Satterfield. I’m not saying he’s great but I see improvement now it’s up to execution
Play calling is disjointed at best. Frankly, we run the wrong O for our talent. Plus, if players keep making mistakes at critical points this deep into the 2nd season, coaching is definitely a factor
No play call is ever wrong if executed how it is drawn up. Ever. But the other team has talented players & they practice too.
Satterfield’s decision making is what is horrendous.
Satterfield’s decision making is what is horrendous.
Last edited:
Satt has room for improvement in that we waste too many plays on predictable runs up the middle. He has periods during the game when play calling is more creative and that needs to happen throughout the game.
Lloyd also took up for a very poor offensive line earlier this season.
I too wish everyone could see what Coach Satt puts into his job.
So, if you work extemerly hard as a salesman but can't ever close the deal they suppose to keep you? NOT!
Can't keep doing the same thing and expect a different result.
Granted, we won on Saturday. But we only put up 286 yards of offense. I think most would agree that's not a recipe for sustained success. You don't stop looking for improvement just because you won.
The coaches and players emphasize that they are constantly working on getting better every week!
Except we're not seeing it. To a man, we were all hoping we'd see some change in offensive philosophy on the heels of the 2nd half at Kentucky. We did not. The offense actually regressed.
App State put up more yards at A&M than we did at WB.
Ok, you can continue to wallow in your misery like so many other whiners.
Happy with the win but against better opponents our offensive play calling and execution must improve. Play calling and execution in red zone in the 4th qtr was horrible. No reason for not scoring on that possession. Defense kept us from losing this game.
I don't mind the pro-style offense on this level....Satterfield may simply need to simplify the one he learned in the NFL and use some elements of a spread style. Spurrier had to adjust his "Fun n' Gun"/"Run n' Shoot" offense a couple of years after he came to Columbia and was more successful when he did.
I say without a doubt Marshawn knows more than EVERYBODY on this board combined about how to play football and how Satterfield coaches. I'm with him. Since y'all know so much about things you know nothing about, what color tie am I wearing today?
It’s a precarious situation for Beamer. You have an under-performing coach who seems to be popular with the players. What to do?
I think you say all the right things in public, like I think Lloyd is doing too.
Everyone is happy and everything is great, right up to the announcement.
Yep. Smart young man too. 3.6 gpa in psychology. Everything you want a true student-athlete to be.
Ha.
Will Muschamp has incredible response when asked about players' vocal support for him
The Gamecocks return to action this week at Ole Miss against a team that is also 2-4.
www.saturdaydownsouth.com
If memory serves he had to resort to a Wildcat offense from time to time and it worked to an extent. And it wasn't until Lattimore came that we started running a zone blocking scheme because that's what Byrnes ran. You gotta play to your strengths.
Yeah, he had several variations depending on the personnel. IIRC Mangus added elements of the spread to Spurrier's offense and Elliott added the zone read when he came on board from App State.
Probably would’ve had more yards if we didn’t have a KOR, INT to the 5 yard line, and a fumble in the redzone. I’ll take that over having more yards.
Ha! You are assuming that more possessions would automatically equate to more yards of offense. There was a period during the game where our offense netted -1 total yards on 3 consecutive possessions.
Depending upon this offense to score is laughable. I would rather have a KO returned for a TD, an INT returned inside the 5, and fumble recovered in the red zone than ever rely upon our offense to score points.
Nope. 81st. SEC defenses ain't no joke. Definite improvement over last year.
I also saw 81st, biut don't share the sentiment that 81st is something to celebrate.
(Think it was espn where I saw that stat)
Even so, how do you think 81st stacks up against other SEC teams. But I'll correct my post.
Nobody was crying like this when we finished 81st in Spurrier's FIFTH year.
I was basing my comment on this from Yahoo. Perhaps they lump BCS and non-BCS teams for the ranking.
Attachments
-
Screenshot 2022-10-25 at 6.11.30 PM.jpg
If you were around message boards then, you might have a different recollection.