Probably intentional, so that the CFP can justify their selections after UGA beats them.
And when bama beats um*.
Probably intentional, so that the CFP can justify their selections after UGA beats them.
Why does it have to be the only (that’s the key word) thing that matters? Obviously if they both lost a game during the season, they both had (at least) one performance so subpar that they were worse than their opponent.Texas was always going to be in before Bama, both had one loss and one beat the other, head to head has to matter.
Because game results have to matter. Most of the time. Well, sometimes. OK, the committee will notify you if the game results mattered or not, but only until after all of the games have been played and an evaluation of possible TV revenues has been completed and it's determined if the game results are aligned with maximum TV revenue. The key takeaway here is that game results don't really matter. Like not even a little bit. It's quite simple really.Why does it have to be the only (that’s the key word) thing that matters? Obviously if they both lost a game during the season, they both had (at least) one performance so subpar that they were worse than their opponent.
Why was Alabama picked over UGA?Why does it have to be the only (that’s the key word) thing that matters? Obviously if they both lost a game during the season, they both had (at least) one performance so subpar that they were worse than their opponent.
My opinion why it was a correct decision is that Bama played a tougher overall schedule than UGA, which included two games against other 1-loss top 10 teams, which no other 1-loss team had.Why was Alabama picked over UGA?
I’m eager to see the following
1) conference affiliation of officiating crew assigned to the UM vs Bama game
2) viewership statistics for the semi-final and final games. UM vs Bama might be the most watched.